BayLee Posted February 17, 2007 Report Posted February 17, 2007 And this guy is being paid to serve and protect Canadian citizens? ~~~~~~~~~~~ A Richmond police officer is being investigated on allegations of child pornography Richmond RCMP are currently involved in a criminal investigation of an officer for allegedly being involved in child pornography. A release from the Department doesn't specify whether that means possessing, making or distributing child porn. But the officer in question was arrested on January 27th and suspended with pay pending a further criminal investigation involving other allegations, including the unsafe storage of a firearm. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Wait...theres more ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A Richmond RCMP officer being investigated for alleged links to child pornography was investigated three years ago by an RCMP disciplinary board. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I have a feeling they will get him this time Quote I Love My Dogs
Borg Posted February 17, 2007 Report Posted February 17, 2007 I do not find this any more surprizing than learning priests have committed abuses. In fact there is truly no sector or position that is invulnerable Borg And this guy is being paid to serve and protect Canadian citizens?~~~~~~~~~~~ A Richmond police officer is being investigated on allegations of child pornography Richmond RCMP are currently involved in a criminal investigation of an officer for allegedly being involved in child pornography. A release from the Department doesn't specify whether that means possessing, making or distributing child porn. But the officer in question was arrested on January 27th and suspended with pay pending a further criminal investigation involving other allegations, including the unsafe storage of a firearm. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Wait...theres more ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A Richmond RCMP officer being investigated for alleged links to child pornography was investigated three years ago by an RCMP disciplinary board. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I have a feeling they will get him this time Quote
geoffrey Posted February 17, 2007 Report Posted February 17, 2007 And Baylee's smear campaign continues... Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
BayLee Posted February 17, 2007 Author Report Posted February 17, 2007 And Baylee's smear campaign continues... I think anyone into kiddie porn,especially a cop should be more than smeared. But apparently fellow poster jeff seems to approve? Quote I Love My Dogs
geoffrey Posted February 17, 2007 Report Posted February 17, 2007 I think anyone into kiddie porn,especially a cop should be more than smeared.But apparently fellow poster jeff seems to approve? Don't be ridiculous, the tone of your writting and posting history makes it clear that your objective is to smear all police officers with the same brush. If 5 officers in Canada are terrible criminals, the profession is doing much better than most. Of course this individual needs to be held to account for his actions. But it has absolutely nothing to do with the police. Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
Canadian Blue Posted February 17, 2007 Report Posted February 17, 2007 Baylee hates alot of people, police officers, soldiers, right wingers, Bush, I think he made a bigoted comment against gays on another. Something about jock sniffing. Quote "Keep your government hands off my medicare!" - GOP activist
BayLee Posted February 17, 2007 Author Report Posted February 17, 2007 I think he made a bigoted comment against gays on another. You feel the need to apologize again there CB for yet another lie? Or would you care to show where I said a biggoted remark against gays. Thats reserved for right wingers. And oh, apparently you approve of kiddie porn also,especially if a cop is involved? Quote I Love My Dogs
myata Posted February 17, 2007 Report Posted February 17, 2007 ... the tone of your writting and posting history makes it clear that your objective is to smear all police officers Sorry but I did"t quite get it either. Can you explain how a report of this very serious incident (presuming that the story is true) amounts to "smearing campaing"? And then, how does your comment relate to the subject of the thread (rather than smearing the poster)? Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
Canadian Blue Posted February 17, 2007 Report Posted February 17, 2007 George Bush, aka the 'jock sniffer' Baylee, isn't jock sniffer a derogatory term for homosexuals. Myata Baylee hates cops, he's called all of them things and pigs before. He says he hasn't, but really what does this quote tell you. I think calling these people things is appropriate.I think PIGS is a better word but some people for whatever reason dont approve of that term You feel the need to apologize again there CB for yet another lie?Or would you care to show where I said a biggoted remark against gays. Thats reserved for right wingers. And oh, apparently you approve of kiddie porn also,especially if a cop is involved? No kiddie porn isn't alright. But then again saying all cops are pigs and things is just as bad. By the way, stop with you're ignorant world view that bigots are reserved to the right wing, obviously you have spread hatred against police officers and soldiers, so you must be a bigot yourself to make such a sweeping generalization. Quote "Keep your government hands off my medicare!" - GOP activist
myata Posted February 17, 2007 Report Posted February 17, 2007 And that was certainly wrong and he's probably got a warning for that (note that no one is obliged to love cops - it's just that using offensive terms especially against a whole group of people is against the rules this board). However, how does that affect this particular thread? I understand if you have problems with the credibility story (btw I didn't notice any references to the source), but how does bringing in personality of the poster relate to the subject? Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
BayLee Posted February 18, 2007 Author Report Posted February 18, 2007 Wow CB,you sure know how to stretch things ay? ( notice I didnt say lie?) I never called cops pigs( but you admit to hanging out on web sites that do) I never called all cops things,just the criminal cops. As for me calling bush a jock sniffer? First that doesnt make me anti gay,which I am not at all,but I can be sure...are. bush,s tag being a jock sniffer,again is as widely known as him being called a moron and a cocaine user is. George Bush, aka the 'jock sniffer' Wayne Madsen Report | 26 Sep 2006 | Wayne Madsen George Bush, aka the 'jock sniffer' Sep. 26, 2006 -- According to individuals who investigated George W. Bush's stint in the 147th Fighter Group of the Texas Air National Guard (TANG), the GOP's top dirty tricksters, notably Karl Rove and Roger Stone, interceded to derail the investigation and, instead, have CBS focus on Bush's faxed, scanned, and Xeroxed original TANG records -- which were later hyped by the right-wing media as fakes. The reason for the GOP's concern was that the investigation was getting dangerously close to exposing Bush's suspected homosexual activity with other members of his TANG unit. Given the times and culture of the early 1970s, investigators were surprised to discover Bush's frequent association with an abundant number of gays in the unit, which was nicknamed the "Champagne Unit." Bush's homosexuality is the bête noire of Bush's past for GOP political operatives, precisely because of the anti-gay stance of the Republican right and its Christian fundamentalist base. In 1986, the Bush family sent George W. Bush to El Paso's Worthy Creations, a Christian gay conversion center. From that time on, Bush became a tool of the Christian right and a self-hating homosexual. The investigation of Bush's gay activities in the TANG unit would have unraveled Bush's new "straight" persona. The GOP went to battle stations to prevent Bush's past from being resurrected. Bush's alleged homosexuality in college was hinted at in Kitty Kelley's massive biography of the Bush family, The Family: The Real Story of the Bush Dynasty, which was released at about the same time as CBS 60 Minutes was investigating Bush's National Guard stint. In the case of Kelley's book and the gay charge, the criticism came not from the GOP operatives but from their allies in the corporate media, including the Washington Post's Howard Kurtz, who is married to a GOP operative. While Bush attended all-boys Andover prep school (nicknamed "bend over"), Bush, not able to make it as an athlete, instead became a male cheerleader. At Yale, Bush, according to Kelley, had a "special relationship" (i.e., gay relationship) with Victor Ashe, his room mate and fellow cheerleader. Ashe, a former Mayor of Knoxville, is now Bush's ambassador to Poland. At the Delta Kappa Epsilon frat house, Bush became known as "a jock sniffer." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Bush, not able to make it as an athlete, instead became a male cheerleader. At Yale, Bush, according to Kelley, had a "special relationship" (i.e., gay relationship) with Victor Ashe, his room mate and fellow cheerleader. Ashe, a former Mayor of Knoxville, is now Bush's ambassador to Poland. At the Delta Kappa Epsilon frat house, Bush became known as "a jock sniffer." Quote I Love My Dogs
Canadian Blue Posted February 18, 2007 Report Posted February 18, 2007 I never called cops pigs( but you admit to hanging out on web sites that do)I never called all cops things,just the criminal cops. Hold on, lets see what you said. Here is what I said, and I mentioned that their will always be some bad apples. No you painted the entire police service with the same brush. You said "and these things wonder why they are hated", which I take to mean every police officer. I have alot of respect for Police Officers, they have to deal with the worst of society, and have very little in the way of support from society. The problem is idiot's who think one bad cop is the same as any other cop. Then you replied. We see cops harrasing people all the time.Cops charging people with drunk driving while being charged themself with drunk driving. Drunk from drinking confiscated liquor at the police station witht the approval of the sarge. I think calling these people things is appropriate. I think PIGS is a better word but some people for whatever reason dont approve of that term So you weren't referring to the individual's, but the entire force. You said that for some reason people don't approve of calling all police officers Pigs, so I'd only assume you hate cops. And that was certainly wrong and he's probably got a warning for that (note that no one is obliged to love cops - it's just that using offensive terms especially against a whole group of people is against the rules this board). However, how does that affect this particular thread? I understand if you have problems with the credibility story (btw I didn't notice any references to the source), but how does bringing in personality of the poster relate to the subject? The problem is that it's not criticism, or even a debate, it's all a smear. Then we people tell him that their are a few bad apples in every occupation, the response is that we support pedophiles. It's ignorant and it does nothing but inflame people. Baylee has also failed to provide all pertinent information. That's the reason why he refused to give links in another thread. Quote "Keep your government hands off my medicare!" - GOP activist
BayLee Posted February 18, 2007 Author Report Posted February 18, 2007 I,m convinced CB must be a cop hater and all for kiddie porn. He admits to hanging out on web sites that spew all kinds of hatred towards cops and he refuses to condem a cop who partakes in kiddie peon. Rather he would rather attack the person who brings this kiddie porn cop to the attention of the forum Quote I Love My Dogs
Canadian Blue Posted February 18, 2007 Report Posted February 18, 2007 I,m convincedCB must be a cop hater and all for kiddie porn. What, and your basing this on the fact that I said you shouldn't paint all police officers with the same brush. I'm interested in becoming a social worker, so I'll visit some websites to see what the thinking is behind the hateful beliefs, and try to understand why they came to be so hateful. He admits to hanging out on web sites that spew all kinds of hatred towards cops and he refuses to condem a cop who partakes in kiddie peon. I did condemn the cop, I said their will always be a few bad apples in the police force, and said kiddie porn was morally reprehensible. Rather he would rather attack the person who brings this kiddie porn cop to the attention of the forum No, I think the person who has been known to hide facts from us [notice no link], and who has made hateful comments doesn't have much credibility. You're just the left wing version of Robert777. You've been warned before, and since you accused me of being a pedophile I'd hope that you will be gone by monday. Quote "Keep your government hands off my medicare!" - GOP activist
geoffrey Posted February 18, 2007 Report Posted February 18, 2007 ... the tone of your writting and posting history makes it clear that your objective is to smear all police officers Sorry but I did"t quite get it either. Can you explain how a report of this very serious incident (presuming that the story is true) amounts to "smearing campaing"? And then, how does your comment relate to the subject of the thread (rather than smearing the poster)? Baylee has made numerous posts referring to police as 'things' and 'pigs.' Also, we've seen posts saying that Canadian soliders intentionally blow away innocent Afghans for fun. This person has some serious mental conditions that need to be address. I addressed the post, it's unfortunate that one person has commit such crimes (if true) and they should be fully punished. What this has to do with Canada's police force is absoutely NOTHING. Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
madmax Posted February 18, 2007 Report Posted February 18, 2007 The problem is that it's not criticism, or even a debate, it's all a smear. Then we people tell him that their are a few bad apples in every occupation, the response is that we support pedophiles. its' ignorant . It sure is!!! Bay Lee must have taken lessons from this guy. Then the wheels fell off the wagon when Harper accused Paul Martin of supporting child pornography. Bay Lee is just an invisible poster on a virtual forum. Stephen Harper was trying to become the Prime Minister of Canada. It's not a debate, it is all smear, a tactic used by the CPC and its supporters past and present. Cost Harper an election, his credibility. Bay Lee should learn from this. Quote
BayLee Posted February 19, 2007 Author Report Posted February 19, 2007 7. You've been warned before, and since you accused me of being a pedophile I'd hope that you will be gone by monday. I accused you of being a pedophile? Excuse me? You are the one who should be gone for once again lieing about what other posters say Quote I Love My Dogs
BayLee Posted February 19, 2007 Author Report Posted February 19, 2007 I also find it interesting how right wingers on this forum and right wingers in general have no problem accusing people who are against war and against bush as being terrorist lovers and friends of the TALIBAN Quote I Love My Dogs
madmax Posted February 19, 2007 Report Posted February 19, 2007 I also find it interesting how right wingers on this forum and right wingers in general have no problem accusing people who are against war and against bush as being terrorist lovers and friends of the TALIBAN This topic is yours, and it is for RCMP and Child Porn. If you don't like being smeared for a creation of the Right, then don't smear "the right" or other posters with the same brush. It didn't work for Harper, it doesn't work for the posters here. Most people soon tune out those whom have nothing to offer but insults regardless of affliation. You sound young, Stephen Harper was a grown man. You need to learn not to Call people supporters of kiddie porn when they don't agree with your perspective. While you are Harper are completely different, your actions are the same. Childish. Quote
BayLee Posted February 19, 2007 Author Report Posted February 19, 2007 You need to learn not to Call people supporters of kiddie porn when they don't agree with your perspective.Childish. People like you seem to forget the words of the man you seem to idolize and can do no wrong.. "You are either with us,or you are against us" You either condem a RCMP cop who is into kiddie porn,or you approve Or how often as I said do you see posters on this forum say you are a friend of terrorism if you are against the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan Quote I Love My Dogs
Figleaf Posted February 19, 2007 Report Posted February 19, 2007 And Baylee's smear campaign continues... Why is it a 'smear' campaign to bring existing media reports to the attention of the board? It sounds like you are trying to silence Baylee and deprive hir of hir freedom of expression based solely on your own prejudices. Quote
Figleaf Posted February 19, 2007 Report Posted February 19, 2007 Baylee hates alot of people, police officers, soldiers, right wingers, Bush, I think he made a bigoted comment against gays on another. Something about jock sniffing. Now THERE is a smear. Quote
Figleaf Posted February 19, 2007 Report Posted February 19, 2007 No kiddie porn isn't alright. But then again saying all cops are pigs and things is just as bad. WOW! There's a wild example of moral relativism if ever there was! Calling police 'pigs' is just as bad as filming child rape?!?!? CB, you need to get a sense of proportion! Quote
Canadian Blue Posted February 19, 2007 Report Posted February 19, 2007 Now THERE is a smear. No it isn't, what do you call someone who call's police officers pigs, soldiers murderers, and anybody right of center a hatemonger. WOW! There's a wild example of moral relativism if ever there was! Calling police 'pigs' is just as bad as filming child rape?!?!? CB, you need to get a sense of proportion! No, it's similar to calling all blacks "niggers", and all homosexuals "fags". Word's often will have more effect on a large proportion of the population than an individual engaged in one act of violence against another individual. Why is it a 'smear' campaign to bring existing media reports to the attention of the board?It sounds like you are trying to silence Baylee and deprive hir of hir freedom of expression based solely on your own prejudices. Because Baylee is calling all members of the RCMP "pigs", and has called all Canadian soldiers in Afghanistan "murderers". It's hypocritical to accuse me of having prejudices when Baylee himself has made wild accusations against entire groups of people. If someone comes on here calling all blacks "niggers" and drug dealers then I would just have as much of a problem with that. I have in fact reported Robert777 who was a bigot. People like you seem to forget the words of the man you seem to idolize and can do no wrong.."You are either with us,or you are against us" What, who on here said it was alright for a police officers to view child porn. But then you attacked me calling me a pedophile. I,m convincedCB must be a cop hater and all for kiddie porn. Quote "Keep your government hands off my medicare!" - GOP activist
Canadian Blue Posted February 19, 2007 Report Posted February 19, 2007 You either condem a RCMP cop who is into kiddie porn,or you approve Didn't we all condemn child pornography, your the one who has called all cops "things" and "pigs". Even though you apparently were in a bit of a trance when you made that post since you can't remember it. Or how often as I said do you see posters on this forum say you are a friend of terrorism if you are against the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan Didn't you call Canadian soldiers murderers without knowing all the facts behind the story. Quote "Keep your government hands off my medicare!" - GOP activist
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.