goodwinn Posted February 7, 2007 Report Posted February 7, 2007 The Guardian reports that British security service has foiled a terrorist plot of Pakistani extremists who planned kidnapping of a victim (Moslem soldier who has just returned from a military service in Afghanistan or Iraq), torturing and beheading him and filming the atrocity for broadcast on the internet. Privately, I recon that these terrorists are not from Pakistan, because what they plotted to do was just what Chechen terrorists did to paws in Russian Chechnya and now keep doing to their captives in Iraq. Then why did British security officials reported that the captives were natives of Pakistan? I'm sure Anglo-Saxons just want to use this opportunity to frame Pakistan. Both Brits and Americans used to accuse this country of assisting Afghan gunmen, and Iran in terms of creating nuclear weapon. I even heard that British and American governments had a discussion of fundamental political take-over in Pakistan. That is why the detention of quasi-Pakistani terrorists came in handy for London and Washington. They find it a good chance to put it across Pakistan and start looking for some non-existent terrorist networks on the territory of this country. Quote
geoffrey Posted February 7, 2007 Report Posted February 7, 2007 Pakistan is a very extremist nation, deep links to terrorism. They are fueling the Taliban fire in Afghanistan and I have little doubt that they are the country that Iran is getting their support from. Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
sharkman Posted February 8, 2007 Report Posted February 8, 2007 How 'bout,"Start looking for some non-existant conspiracy terrorist theories in Pakistan" for a thread title. It's a little closer to what you mean. Quote
GostHacked Posted February 9, 2007 Report Posted February 9, 2007 Pakistan is a very extremist nation, deep links to terrorism. They are fueling the Taliban fire in Afghanistan and I have little doubt that they are the country that Iran is getting their support from. Pakistan has been doing shady things for along time. Trying to be buddy with the US then stabbing them in the back by supporting terrorism. Seems like the Saudi Arabia and Pakistan both contribute to terrorism more than Iran, Iraq had. Yet they are never really targeted by the United States. Quote
geoffrey Posted February 10, 2007 Report Posted February 10, 2007 Pakistan is a very extremist nation, deep links to terrorism. They are fueling the Taliban fire in Afghanistan and I have little doubt that they are the country that Iran is getting their support from. Pakistan has been doing shady things for along time. Trying to be buddy with the US then stabbing them in the back by supporting terrorism. Seems like the Saudi Arabia and Pakistan both contribute to terrorism more than Iran, Iraq had. Yet they are never really targeted by the United States. The Saudi's, for obvious reason. They gots the oil! Pakistan, I'm a little unsure on. I don't see why we can't be harsher with them. What the hell does Pakistan do for us? Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
jbg Posted February 10, 2007 Report Posted February 10, 2007 Pakistan has been doing shady things for along time. Trying to be buddy with the US then stabbing them in the back by supporting terrorism. Seems like the Saudi Arabia and Pakistan both contribute to terrorism more than Iran, Iraq had. Yet they are never really targeted by the United States. I carry no flag for Saudi Arabia. We should seize their oil provinces, either turn the rest of the place into a parking lot or let them eat camel meat and when they're finished, sand. The princes there support some of the sickest brutality known to man. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
GostHacked Posted February 10, 2007 Report Posted February 10, 2007 Pakistan has been doing shady things for along time. Trying to be buddy with the US then stabbing them in the back by supporting terrorism. Seems like the Saudi Arabia and Pakistan both contribute to terrorism more than Iran, Iraq had. Yet they are never really targeted by the United States. I carry no flag for Saudi Arabia. We should seize their oil provinces, either turn the rest of the place into a parking lot or let them eat camel meat and when they're finished, sand. The princes there support some of the sickest brutality known to man. So why was Saddam any worse?? Real terrorist states are NOT being dealt with. Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are from what I see and read, terrorist states. Quote
jbg Posted February 10, 2007 Report Posted February 10, 2007 So why was Saddam any worse?? Real terrorist states are NOT being dealt with. Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are from what I see and read, terrorist states. One at a time. Also, there are only so many new parking lots that the market can absorb quickly. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.