jdobbin Posted September 1, 2006 Report Posted September 1, 2006 The latest Harris poll. http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/ Quote
sharkman Posted September 2, 2006 Report Posted September 2, 2006 This is not surprising, really. It's this same mentality that saw nothing wrong with dealing with the madman Saddam. Europe has allowed a threatening crisis grow within it's own borders, and now Mulsim protestors are realizing the power they wield. They are starting to engage in terrorist acts with increasing regularity. Much easier to ignore these threats and instead point fingers elsewhere. Quote
geoffrey Posted September 3, 2006 Report Posted September 3, 2006 Since 9/11... including 9/11... how many terrorist attacks in the US? How many in Europe? How about race riots... only in Europe lately. Hmm... who's the real threat? Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
KrustyKidd Posted September 3, 2006 Report Posted September 3, 2006 Hmm... who's the real threat? Conservative Wahabbist Islam Quote We're Paratroopers Lieutenant. We're supposed to be surrounded - CPT Richard Winters
Bakunin Posted September 3, 2006 Report Posted September 3, 2006 This is not surprising, really. It's this same mentality that saw nothing wrong with dealing with the madman Saddam. Europe has allowed a threatening crisis grow within it's own borders, and now Mulsim protestors are realizing the power they wield. They are starting to engage in terrorist acts with increasing regularity. Much easier to ignore these threats and instead point fingers elsewhere. Lol, isn't it the americans that started dealing with Saddam... Thats the problem, superpowers keep doing bussiness with dictators and when they can't, they get rid of em and place another dictator in place... I think it is due to the lack of power and fund of the UN to intervene around the world... After all, getting rid of Dictators should be the UN jobs. I started reading a book about the genocide in rwanda... Romeo Dallaire talks about how UN works.. when he was in rwanda, he didn't get enough funding to have paper for his FAX... in his workplace he had no furniture... no chair... he and his team had to write lying down on the floor. he had no safe place to put his secrets files. Lack of firepower, not enough vehicles .His recomandation where ignored, his reports where rewritten to hide bad news to the media and keep the UN from intervening more and etc... Quote
KrustyKidd Posted September 3, 2006 Report Posted September 3, 2006 Lol, isn't it the americans that started dealing with Saddam... No. It was the Russians and the French. The US accounted for less than ten percent. Thats the problem, superpowers keep doing bussiness with dictators and when they can't, they get rid of em and place another dictator in place. Yes. In the case of Iraq it appears the US has done something different by introducing the conditions to enable democracy instead. As for the UN doing regime change themselves it should be but as we know, the UN is rife with countries headed by dictators and oppressive regimes. Quote We're Paratroopers Lieutenant. We're supposed to be surrounded - CPT Richard Winters
yam Posted September 3, 2006 Report Posted September 3, 2006 I hope you dont mind if i call you "Dick" . . . .for short Quote
yam Posted September 3, 2006 Report Posted September 3, 2006 Say your initials are missing the last K, regardlful . . . I hope you dont mind if i call you "Dick" . . . . . . .for short ey Quote
KrustyKidd Posted September 3, 2006 Report Posted September 3, 2006 Say your initials are missing the last K, regardlful . . .I hope you dont mind if i call you "Dick" . . . . . . .for short ey Tell me please that your name doesn't stand for Ya, I'm a moron. And, I hope you don't mind me telling you that you refuted nothing I said nor did you add anything but idiocy to the forum. You can call me Krusty Kid if you wish. I think you were alluding to the Klu Klux Klan which was a racist group from the US. Try the phonics. Krusty Kid. Klu Klux Klan. Try it a few times. Not the same. Quote We're Paratroopers Lieutenant. We're supposed to be surrounded - CPT Richard Winters
yam Posted September 3, 2006 Report Posted September 3, 2006 In other words your convictions are CRAP concerning each of your assertions. Quote
KrustyKidd Posted September 3, 2006 Report Posted September 3, 2006 In other words your convictions are CRAP concerning each of your assertions. No. They are factually correct and you provided nothing to counter it. Possibly you are not familiar with history or how to conduct an argument but if you wished, you easily could join in by learning a bit then offering some information to counter what I have put forth if there is any. Quote We're Paratroopers Lieutenant. We're supposed to be surrounded - CPT Richard Winters
yam Posted September 3, 2006 Report Posted September 3, 2006 I read history; NOT propogander. Your nothing but a right wing, home grown clone. Quote
KrustyKidd Posted September 3, 2006 Report Posted September 3, 2006 I read history; NOT propogander.Your nothing but a right wing, home grown clone. What did your reading tell you specificlly? Do you have an argument or just an inane ability to patheticly flounder on a debate forum? If you have nothing that counters what I put forth then you might have to accept that you don't have any facts to base your opinions and may possibly be basing all of them on idiocy and hubris. Quote We're Paratroopers Lieutenant. We're supposed to be surrounded - CPT Richard Winters
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.