jbg Posted July 4, 2006 Report Posted July 4, 2006 For every uninformed person who says that, I point to Winston churchill as an example. No one ever likes to hear the news that they're at war. The West is at war, and it started before the Crusades, not on January 20, 2001. Bush delivered the bad news, and is fighting the war with the political and military tools he has. The carping is not helpful. good grief. Winston Churchill must be spinning in his grave. Everything Bush has touched has turned to sh@t. I'm not carping, I'm telling you the man has ruined his Country and is doing his best with the rest of the world. Bush didn't deliver anything. Al Qaida delivered the bad news and ANY President would have gone after them. Pretending otherwise is nonsense. Oh yes. Bill Clinton letting bin Laden slip away a few times, so as to to offend political sensibilities. Case rested. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
gerryhatrick Posted July 4, 2006 Author Report Posted July 4, 2006 Oh yes. Bill Clinton letting bin Laden slip away a few times, so as to to offend political sensibilities. Case rested. wth? You're comparing Bush to Bill Clinton now? Bush has f'd up the USA, it's sense of self, it's relationship with the world, it's legal ethics, Iraq, terrorism, the list could go on. He's the most arrogant and power-grubbing and just plain WORSE President EVER. His simplistic "visions" are messing up the planet. You could put that on a poll question and get about 65% of Americans agreeing with you. So don't even bother. Quote Conservative Party of Canada taking image advice from US Republican pollster: http://allpoliticsnow.com
jbg Posted July 4, 2006 Report Posted July 4, 2006 Oh yes. Bill Clinton letting bin Laden slip away a few times, so as to to offend political sensibilities. Case rested. wth? You're comparing Bush to Bill Clinton now? Bush has f'd up the USA, it's sense of self, it's relationship with the world, it's legal ethics, Iraq, terrorism, the list could go on. He's the most arrogant and power-grubbing and just plain WORSE President EVER. His simplistic "visions" are messing up the planet. You could put that on a poll question and get about 65% of Americans agreeing with you. So don't even bother. Given that Ronald Reagan isn't comiing out of the grave soon ans that GWHB was hardly a model President, who else to compare him to? The hapless, feckless Jimmy Carter who was overhwhelmed with kller rabbits? Or Gerald Ford? Or Richard Mihous Nixon? Or perhaps "Hey Hey LBJ, how many children you kill today"? Or JFK who also couldn't keep his zipper up? The pool of available Presidents or PM's is small and all are flawed. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
sharkman Posted July 4, 2006 Report Posted July 4, 2006 Furthermore, the point about Clinton was in reference to his handling of Osama, who declined when Yemen snagged him and asked the U.S. if they wanted him. Bush, on the other hand, has made it open season on the scoundrel. All the wild criticisms of Bush(f'd up the U.S. AND it's sense of self, eh?{What the hell is that?} Do you even read what goes up on your screen?) are classic symptoms of, wait for it, Bush Derangement Syndrome. Most Americans are smart enough to be glad that 9/11 didn't happen on Gore's watch. Quote
newbie Posted July 4, 2006 Report Posted July 4, 2006 Furthermore, the point about Clinton was in reference to his handling of Osama, who declined when Yemen snagged him and asked the U.S. if they wanted him. Link please? Quote
jbg Posted July 5, 2006 Report Posted July 5, 2006 Furthermore, the point about Clinton was in reference to his handling of Osama, who declined when Yemen snagged him and asked the U.S. if they wanted him. Bush, on the other hand, has made it open season on the scoundrel. All the wild criticisms of Bush(f'd up the U.S. AND it's sense of self, eh?{What the hell is that?} Do you even read what goes up on your screen?) are classic symptoms of, wait for it, Bush Derangement Syndrome. Most Americans are smart enough to be glad that 9/11 didn't happen on Gore's watch. I think you mean Sudan, not Yemen. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
BHS Posted July 5, 2006 Report Posted July 5, 2006 Oh yes. Bill Clinton letting bin Laden slip away a few times, so as to to offend political sensibilities. Case rested. wth? You're comparing Bush to Bill Clinton now? Bush has f'd up the USA, it's sense of self, it's relationship with the world, it's legal ethics, Iraq, terrorism, the list could go on. He's the most arrogant and power-grubbing and just plain WORSE President EVER. His simplistic "visions" are messing up the planet. You could put that on a poll question and get about 65% of Americans agreeing with you. So don't even bother. The same level of overblown nonsense that Gerry brings to every thread. Hey Gerry: Trudeau was the worst Canadian Prime Minister ever. He destroyed the whole damn country. We were on par with the Yanks before him, and now we'll forever live in their shadow. He wasn't fit to carry GWB's chamber pot. Quote "And, representing the Slightly Silly Party, Mr. Kevin Phillips Bong." * * * "Er..no. Harper was elected because the people were sick of the other guys and wanted a change. Don't confuse electoral success (which came be attributed to a wide variety of factors) with broad support. That's the surest way to wind up on the sidelines." - Black Dog
Hicksey Posted July 5, 2006 Report Posted July 5, 2006 The defense being mounted by people who know nothing is indicitive of the zealous willingness to accept anything the CPC does. Very Bush-like. Why is "Bush" the automatic demonization term these days? Oh, I don't know. Maybe because he's been an unmitigated disaster? He's not everything a conservative dreams of, but he's the best there was offered. Gore and Kerry are a joke. What liberals should be lamenting is that of all the choices among their party, the DNC couldn't offer a candidate to beat a half-baked Republican. Bush won because Democrats had nothing better to offer John Q Voter. Quote "If in passing, you never encounter anything that offends you, you are not living in a free society." - Rt. Hon. Kim Campbell - βIn many respects, the government needs fewer rules, but rules that are consistently applied.β - Sheila Fraser, Former Auditor General.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.