Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Gutfeld apparently reads this forum. He perfectly described numerous lefties here. 

He has a great point though. We waste a lot of time explaining stuff that is obvious like the sky is blue and someone with a schlong isn't a woman. 

 

Edited by gatomontes99
  • Like 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted

If only I had an example. Oh wait, here's one:

6 hours ago, robosmith said:

^TWO lDIOTS pretending to be experts on human sexuality when neither knows JACK SHIT about it, because they've never read a SINGLE scientific journal on  the subject. 

LMAO

 

 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

  • gatomontes99 changed the title to Greg Gutfeld: Performative Ignorance
Posted
10 hours ago, robosmith said:

^TWO lDIOTS pretending to be experts on human sexuality when neither knows JACK SHIT about it, because they've never read a SINGLE scientific journal on  the subject. 

LMAO

 

Well Mr. Bumblefodder... The difference is, we idi*ts (capless) don't just read those scientific journals, we unlike you and your fellow non-entities, actually understand what we read.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Legato said:

Well Mr. Bumblefodder... The difference is, we idi*ts (capless) don't just read those scientific journals, we unlike you and your fellow non-entities, actually understand what we read.

What relevant scientific journal have you read on the subject of human sexuality?

If you don't respond in the next hour, we'll know you have NOT.

Posted
Just now, robosmith said:

What relevant scientific journal have you read on the subject of human sexuality?

If you don't respond in the next hour, we'll know you have NOT.

He posted 2 hours ago. But you know that. I am guessing you think this lame demand proves something? 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
26 minutes ago, robosmith said:

What relevant scientific journal have you read on the subject of human sexuality?

If you don't respond in the next hour, we'll know you have NOT.

Hustler, Penthouse, Noddy in Toyland, Caprices synopsis of Nature in it's unrealistic Naturality.

Some even had pictures.

  • Haha 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Legato said:

Hustler, Penthouse, Noddy in Toyland, Caprices synopsis of Nature in it's unrealistic Naturality.

Some even had pictures.

Thanks for demonstrating you have no idea what a scientific journal is, let alone understanding them.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Legato said:

Hustler, Penthouse, Noddy in Toyland, Caprices synopsis of Nature in it's unrealistic Naturality.

Some even had pictures.

The pics are nice, but the writing in Hustler is top shelf! 

3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Thanks for demonstrating you have no idea what a scientific journal is, let alone understanding them.

Thanks for proving the premise of this thread. 

  • Like 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Thanks for demonstrating you have no idea what a scientific journal is, let alone understanding them.

So never read "Caprices synopsis of Nature in it's unrealistic Naturality".

That's why your expertise on this subject is non-existent.

Posted
15 minutes ago, Legato said:

So never read "Caprices synopsis of Nature in it's unrealistic Naturality".

That's why your expertise on this subject is non-existent.

You've not even shown that it's science, let alone published in a science journal.

Posted
4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You've not even shown that it's science, let alone published in a science journal.

Its like you want to prove me correct! 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
Just now, robosmith said:

You've not even shown that it's science, let alone published in a science journal.

I can't show you, read it for yourself.

Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Since you have no link, it's just YOUR FANTASY.

You're a big boy (maybe). Seek and ye shall find. Links are just lazy bumfodder.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...