Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

SCOTUS? 

.............. someone please tell me that they're not political. 

On the other hand, depending, rule the court, rule the land - legitimately. 

And we are going to find out! 

Can't wait. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, John Stone said:

SCOTUS? 

.............. someone please tell me that they're not political. 

On the other hand, depending, rule the court, rule the land - legitimately. 

And we are going to find out! 

Can't wait. 

Per the video, they are intent on cementing minority (conservative) government.

Posted

Fantasy:

19 hours ago, robosmith said:

Per the video, they are intent on cementing minority (conservative) government.

Reality:

Quote

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Americans' overall ideological views were about the same in 2020 as in 2019, with 36%, on average, identifying as conservative, 35% as moderate and 25% as liberal.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/328367/americans-political-ideology-held-steady-2020.aspx

 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
20 hours ago, robosmith said:

Only an lDIOT like LUser would claim important discussions are "SPAM." LMAO

That is far easier than his inability to actually address the issues presented. Duh

 

Lmao...she is from Canada! How many times have you said Canadian opinions are worthless? 

I watched part so no one else has to. Just a few minutes in and she says the purpose of the SCOTUS is to protect minority rights (kind of true, but not sole purpose) and that this court is cementing minority rights (as if that is a bad thing). Then the host says all the people that are learned on the Constitution and SCOTUS are siding with SCOTUS, even if theynare liberals appointed by Joe Biden. So, he basically admits that his positions are invalid and even the left leaning scholars agree that he is wrong. 

I don't know why @robosmith would post this. It basically disproven everything he said in the title. Oh  BTW, here are all the rulings that SCOTUS has made: https://www.scotusblog.com/

So, no secret rulings. All rulings are up front, readable, reachable and most are unanimous. 

 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
22 hours ago, robosmith said:

Only an lDIOT like LUser would claim important discussions are "SPAM." LMAO

That is far easier than his inability to actually address the issues presented. Duh

Where is your discussion? It is spam because all you do is post a video like a lazy spambot. Then you never actually engage in discussion. Even now, you call me out, when you are a coward hiding from me. 

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,018
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Dealsshutter
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Gtechalax earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Gtechalax earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Gtechalax earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Canadaisintrouble earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • AlizyMalik earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...