Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Shoop,

Since you support conservatives,

I think what Eureka is saying is -Faux you conservative! :lol:

"Any man under 30 who is not a liberal has no heart, and any man over 30 who is not a conservative has no brains."

— Winston Churchill

Posted

Yeah, it is pretty sad that Eureka's only role on this site is to attack the CPC yet he still gets away with it.

He can be like all the other Liberal party *faithful* in the dark days between 1984-1993. Cursing the Canadian people for denying them their right to govern... :lol:

Shoop,

Since you support conservatives,

I think what Eureka is saying is -Faux you conservative! :lol:

Posted
No I did not, Canuck!

eureka  Posted on: Nov 14 2005, 07:48 PM

There is a way of voting no-confidence and bringing down a government. That way is by defeating it on a money bill. This "compromise" os som[ly gamesmanship and Layton has disappointed me to the point where, for the first time, I may vote Liberal.

"We don't like your government but we dare not oppose your budget and annoy the voters, so will you please sign a piece of paper to say that you will relinquish government when we want you to."

What a crock!

Your right,it is a crock......your memory that is. :)

"Any man under 30 who is not a liberal has no heart, and any man over 30 who is not a conservative has no brains."

— Winston Churchill

Posted
No I did not, Canuck!

eureka   Posted on: Nov 14 2005, 07:48 PM

There is a way of voting no-confidence and bringing down a government. That way is by defeating it on a money bill. This "compromise" os som[ly gamesmanship and Layton has disappointed me to the point where, for the first time, I may vote Liberal.

"We don't like your government but we dare not oppose your budget and annoy the voters, so will you please sign a piece of paper to say that you will relinquish government when we want you to."

What a crock!

Your right,it is a crock......your memory that is. :)

All it looks like to me is that he said he "MAY" vote liberal. What is with hanging everybody without real proof, or evidence? This is one of the attitudes I am talking about. Harper has the exact same approach in every sound bite.

I want some facts. Not accusations and circumstance. That is what the witch trials where all about. My god do we need to learn that horrible lesson again?

Posted

Hmmm, funny how you can never get *real proof* or *evidence* based solely on what somebody posts on a message board. :lol:

Here is some facts for you. Justice Gomery found that the Liberal Party of Canada was responsible for the theft of $1.14 Million in the sponsorship scandal. The Party has not disputed this. Gomery clearly wasn't a *witch trial*. That amount of money is sickening and the party found guilty of stealing it does not deserve to be elected in the election immediatley following the release of the results.

What is with hanging everybody without real proof, or evidence? This is one of the attitudes I am talking about. Harper has the exact same approach in every sound bite.

I want some facts. Not accusations and circumstance. That is what the witch trials where all about. My god do we need to learn that horrible lesson again?

Posted
Hmmm, funny how you can never get *real proof* or *evidence* based solely on what somebody posts on a message board.  :lol:

Here is some facts for you. Justice Gomery found that the Liberal Party of Canada was responsible for the theft of $1.14 Million in the sponsorship scandal. The Party has not disputed this. Gomery clearly wasn't a *witch trial*. That amount of money is sickening and the party found guilty of stealing it does not deserve to be elected in the election immediatley following the release of the results.

What is with hanging everybody without real proof, or evidence? This is one of the attitudes I am talking about. Harper has the exact same approach in every sound bite.

I want some facts. Not accusations and circumstance. That is what the witch trials where all about. My god do we need to learn that horrible lesson again?

He said he "MAY" vote liberal not that he "WILL" vote liberal. So much for your "evidence".

That was not the Paul Martin led Liberals. Martin was exhonerated, but you wouldn't know it from this site! Please show me where it says "Martin was responsible", and where I said "Gomery was a witch hunt". Just some more baseless accusations being made.

I would like to see the quote about the "Liberal Party" being responsible for the theft.

Are you sure it wasn't just some "members of the liberal party"?

Because I just can't recall when the whole party was found to be involved, by Gomery.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...