The left outed once again

[!!!]

So, like I said in that thread about FISA etc., you're either a current member posting under a new pseudonym for whatever purposes of devient amusement you've devised, or you've already been banned under a different name and are soon to be banned again. Which would be kind of sad, really. I've rather enjoyed our vicious little banterings here this evening. It's good to argue with someone who actually knows what they're talking about and isn't eureka. (Black Dog and newbie are okay by me, too).

I would hardly call "logged out and lost my password" a source of deviant amusement, but however you get your kicks.

Also: woof.

[BHS]

So, like I said in that thread about FISA etc., you're either a current member posting under a new pseudonym for whatever purposes of devient amusement you've devised, or you've already been banned under a different name and are soon to be banned again. Which would be kind of sad, really. I've rather enjoyed our vicious little banterings here this evening. It's good to argue with someone who actually knows what they're talking about and isn't eureka. (Black Dog and newbie are okay by me, too).

I would hardly call "logged out and lost my password" a source of deviant amusement, but however you get your kicks.

Also: woof.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Gotcha. Your old moniker was good and will be missed. I never figured out if it was because you're of Scottish decent or if there was some other reason.

[Montgomery Burns]

Right or Left

Coulter or Moore

With us or against us

Bush supporter or terrorist supporter

Back the Iraq war or love Saddam

My way or the highway.

Sheesh!

it's really unfortunate that the USA does not have a "centre".

GWB has divided the country into two camps. There is NO middle groud --frankly it's childish and ridiculous.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

It is the Democrats who have divided the country. Despite Bush's repeated attempts to reach out to them, they prove time and time again that partisan politics is all they care about. Look at how they embolden the Jihadists when they constantly demoralize the troops. They are playing with people's lives; they are dividers, not uniters.

[Riverwind]

Look at how they embolden the Jihadists when they constantly demoralize the troops.  They are playing with people's lives; they are dividers, not uniters.

That is rich coming from someone who supports George 'if you aren't with us you are against us' Bush.

[Montgomery Burns]

Pocket Rocket:

Is that the same "finely tuned analytical prowess" that stated on national television that Canada sent combat troops to VietNam???

She erred about CANADA sending troops, but there were many Canadians who fought in the Vietnam War. Ann should brush up on the history of the country that, according to PMPM, leads the woorrrlllldddd!

What is it about Ann Coulter that makes certain people scour every inch of her 4 best-selling books, scour her numerous speeches (when she isn't being pied by the champions of free speech), scour her numerous columns, and scour every word she utters on her numerous TV appearances, frantically looking for something - anything! - that might not be absolutely 100% accurate?

Might it be the fact that she regularly demolishs liberals using cold hard facts and her razor sharp barbs?

The same prowess which when contradicted on this point, twice, left it with "I'll get back to you on that", and never did???

Do you really believe that the CBC would have allowed her to reply on TV? The same CBC that deletes the word "terrorist" from its comments?

The same prowess that stated that Canada better hope the USA doesn't "Roll over and crush her"???

Context. Why did she utter that sentence?

Oh right. It was in response to Carolyn Parrish going on our state-run TV and stomping a George Bush doll with her boot and then savagely stabbing the Bush doll in the face with a pencil.

The bloody nerve of Coulter. She obviously doesn't understand liberal "humor".

Just curious. I like to know exactly what YOU consider to be "Finely tuned".

Can I answer for him?

Hmmm. The NY Times? The CBC? Dan Rather? Mary Mapes? Howard Dean? Cindy Sheehan? Harry Reid? Michael Moore? George Clooney? Sean Penn? Ward Churchill? Chris Matthews? Nancy Pelosi? Noam Chomsky? Robert Fisk? Kofi Annan? Ramsey Clark? Dick Durbin? New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin? Jack Murtha? George Galloway? Maurice Hinchey? Cynthia McKinney? Kanye West? Ted Rall? Juan Cole? Code Pink?

So many to choose from....

[newbie]

Oh right.  It was in response to Carolyn Parrish going on our state-run TV and stomping a George Bush doll with her

So many to choose from....

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Please get therapy for your Carolyn Parrish fetish. It is becoming very old on this forum. Obviously, she is the only Liberal that you rely on for your pathetic attacts. She was dealt with. http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/20...rish041118.html

Get over it!!

[PocketRocket]

Pocket Rocket:

Is that the same "finely tuned analytical prowess" that stated on national television that Canada sent combat troops to VietNam???

She erred about CANADA sending troops, but there were many Canadians who fought in the Vietnam War. Ann should brush up on the history of the country that, according to PMPM, leads the woorrrlllldddd!

Maybe she should know her facts before making claims. "Erred" is extremely generous of you. But then again, you seem to think Coulter and all her ilk can do no wrong.

The difference between you and I is that you seem to only find fault with the Left, while I find fault with both sides.

Parrish is/was a twit, no doubt.

But Coulter is equally a twit.

The rest of your post isn't worth replying to as it's more BURNS hyperbole, right up there with your repeated, sarcastic "No blood for OOOIIILLLLLLL" cries.

[YankAbroad]

Coulter is equally a twit

Actually, I think Ms. Coulter has no equal in twittiness. She's refined shrieky and unbalanced hyperbole, combined with the politics of personal destruction, to an art form which would have made Hearst at his worst green with envy at her capabilities.