bigdude Posted May 27, 2005 Report Posted May 27, 2005 It has been researched that 2 out of 3 Green votes are from left-of centre voters. Under the circumstances should the New Democrats merge with the Greens? Quote
cybercoma Posted May 27, 2005 Report Posted May 27, 2005 It has been researched that 2 out of 3 Green votes are from left-of centre voters.Under the circumstances should the New Democrats merge with the Greens? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Sure... If they weren't entirely different platforms. Quote
cdnstiff Posted May 28, 2005 Report Posted May 28, 2005 yeah, the Greens are actually right leaning. Quote
bigdude Posted May 28, 2005 Author Report Posted May 28, 2005 Well you folks have confirmed the one out of three votes that no one wants. It is the other two out of three votes that are of interest to the New Democrats. Like another party other without mentioning any names, the major problem for the Greens is leadership - or lack thereof. They dropped 25% of their support in the last BC election. Quote
Canuck E Stan Posted May 28, 2005 Report Posted May 28, 2005 Damn, it's always that leadership thing, more important than the policies for some people. Quote "Any man under 30 who is not a liberal has no heart, and any man over 30 who is not a conservative has no brains." — Winston Churchill
Riverwind Posted May 28, 2005 Report Posted May 28, 2005 Like another party other without mentioning any names, the major problem for the Greens is leadership - or lack thereof. They dropped 25% of their support in the last BC election. If you look at how the opinion polls were looking up to the election day you will see that about 5% of the voters shifted at the last moment from the Greens to the NDP. The net result was a much better than expected performance for the NDP. It sounds like strategic voting and it paid off for the Green supporters that made the switch. Here is a link with some numbers: http://esm.ubc.ca/BC05/index.php Quote To fly a plane, you need both a left wing and a right wing.
bigdude Posted May 28, 2005 Author Report Posted May 28, 2005 The only thing that matters is how people actually vote. The same thing happened during the last election to the NDP. But in their case they have picked themselves up by their bootstraps, and it now appears that the New Democrats are closing in on the Cons for second place in federal politics. Quote
Canuck E Stan Posted May 28, 2005 Report Posted May 28, 2005 And the Bloc become the official opposition.....again Quote "Any man under 30 who is not a liberal has no heart, and any man over 30 who is not a conservative has no brains." — Winston Churchill
bigdude Posted May 28, 2005 Author Report Posted May 28, 2005 That's a bit of a defeatist attitude don't you think? As I said we can expect quite a few surprises when the votes are all counted after the next federal election. Imn the meantime I think we should all relax and enjoy the summer! Quote
bigdude Posted May 30, 2005 Author Report Posted May 30, 2005 Did the Greens Put the BC Liberals Back in Office? Excellent article about what happens when you split the vote. I wonder in the federal New Democrats are once again going to be lagging behind their NDP couterparts in BC, exploring merger talks with the Greens. The time is now to get this little project off the ground. Quote
bigdude Posted May 30, 2005 Author Report Posted May 30, 2005 More impetus for these two parties to get together: Greenhouse gases growing faster than economy "We hadn't made any progress at all. We were actually going backwards," said climate expert Gordon McBean, a former chief of Canada's meteorological service who is now a University of Western Ontario professor.The 2003 figures also mean Canada will probably have to revise its latest Kyoto plan, announced in April at a cost of $10 billion. Greenhouse gas emissions are growing faster than the plan's projections. In a summary to be posted shortly on the environment department's website, federal officials say that heavier home and office heating to cope with a "colder than average winter" was largely responsible for the increased "intensity" of greenhouse gas emissions in 2003. A colder winter was also cited in the 2002 summary, when emissions nonetheless grew less than the economy. One climate expert said the 2003 result could mean Ottawa would have to spend even more on purchasing greenhouse gas credits from abroad to hit Canada's Kyoto target of a six per cent reduction from 1990 emission levels. Quote
cybercoma Posted May 30, 2005 Report Posted May 30, 2005 The Kyoto Protocol is absolutely worthless. It's a money hog and those dollars don't even stay in Canada. The United States couldn't have been more correct in thumbing their noses at it. Quote
bigdude Posted May 30, 2005 Author Report Posted May 30, 2005 Oh yes, George Bush's America. Now there is a shining example for all the world to follow concerning environmental issues, NOT. Quote
cybercoma Posted May 30, 2005 Report Posted May 30, 2005 Oh yes, George Bush's America. Now there is a shining example for all the world to follow concerning environmental issues, NOT. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I'm sorry, show me where I said we should do the same things to clean up the environment as the United States? Quote
Black Dog Posted May 31, 2005 Report Posted May 31, 2005 It has been researched that 2 out of 3 Green votes are from left-of centre voters.Under the circumstances should the New Democrats merge with the Greens? No. Just because, on they appear similar on the surface, doesn't mean they are compatiable. The NDP are moderate social democrats. The Green's are old Progressive Conservatives on a Mother Earth kick. That's not to say I agree with the Dippers on all fronts (I don't care much for Kyoto, but then I'm the first to admit to not knowing the real story for all the propaganda), but my gut tels me the Greens are a front. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.