Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Paulmartintime

Paul's Priorities:

1. Corporate Tax Cuts

Canada's are among the lowest effective taxes (27.4%) on corporate income of all industrialized countries, with effective rates of taxation far lower than in the US (40%). But even as health care and education funding stagnated, Paul Martin dished up a 35% decrease in tax rates for corporations--far more than the 21% break for families.

2. Enriching the Wealthy

According to the government's handy tax calculator, a single mother of one child earning $15,000 annually would save a much-needed $569. By contrast, a single man making $125,000 annually would save over $4,000. Though people earning under $40,000 make up 70% of Canadian taxpayers, this same 70% received only 36% of the total cuts in 2000.

Martin's fiscal policies as finance minister have already resulted in a major increase in the gap between the rich and the poor, but he hasn't lost his fervour: Martin is making tax cuts his top priority as Prime Minister.

3. Cheap Labour

Paul Martin knows that there are two ways for corporations to increase profits: cut costs or increase revenue. There are only so many ways to sell more product, and while executive salaries rise indefinitely, rank and file labour costs always represent major potential profit increases in the eyes of CEOs. Indeed, Martin himself put this into practice when he fired the Canadian crews of Canada Steamship Lines and replaced them with Indonesians who worked for a little over a dollar an hour and were denied overtime pay.

4. Privatization

In the years to come, investors and CEOs see the possibilities of trillions of dollars of potential value in the areas of water, health care, and education. By cutting funding for government services in all of these areas, Paul Martin is effectively creating an environment friendly to privatization.

Among Paul Martin's first moves as Prime Minister was the decision to axe the housing minister and appoint a privatization czar. Actions like these leave little doubt as to Martin's actual priorities.

5. US Militarization

Groups like the Canadian Council of Chief Executives demand ever-closer integration with the US, in order to keep Canadian labour costs low and benefit from US contracts. Among the lucrative contracts from the south are a wide array of "defense" deals. Arms manufacturing in Canada is one of the country's fastest growing industries. With Martin as Finance Minister, the Canada Pension Plan invested $2.55 billion in arms manufacturers, including weapons used in Iraq and Afghanistan. Martin has also repeatedly shown his intention of joining the US missile defence plan.

Quite a guy, this prime minister of ours, eh! :ph34r:

Posted
Paulmartintime
Paul's Priorities:

1. Corporate Tax Cuts

Canada's are among the lowest effective taxes (27.4%) on corporate income of all industrialized countries, with effective rates of taxation far lower than in the US (40%). But even as health care and education funding stagnated, Paul Martin dished up a 35% decrease in tax rates for corporations--far more than the 21% break for families.

2. Enriching the Wealthy

According to the government's handy tax calculator, a single mother of one child earning $15,000 annually would save a much-needed $569. By contrast, a single man making $125,000 annually would save over $4,000. Though people earning under $40,000 make up 70% of Canadian taxpayers, this same 70% received only 36% of the total cuts in 2000.

Martin's fiscal policies as finance minister have already resulted in a major increase in the gap between the rich and the poor, but he hasn't lost his fervour: Martin is making tax cuts his top priority as Prime Minister.

3. Cheap Labour

Paul Martin knows that there are two ways for corporations to increase profits: cut costs or increase revenue. There are only so many ways to sell more product, and while executive salaries rise indefinitely, rank and file labour costs always represent major potential profit increases in the eyes of CEOs. Indeed, Martin himself put this into practice when he fired the Canadian crews of Canada Steamship Lines and replaced them with Indonesians who worked for a little over a dollar an hour and were denied overtime pay.

4. Privatization

In the years to come, investors and CEOs see the possibilities of trillions of dollars of potential value in the areas of water, health care, and education. By cutting funding for government services in all of these areas, Paul Martin is effectively creating an environment friendly to privatization.

Among Paul Martin's first moves as Prime Minister was the decision to axe the housing minister and appoint a privatization czar. Actions like these leave little doubt as to Martin's actual priorities.

5. US Militarization

Groups like the Canadian Council of Chief Executives demand ever-closer integration with the US, in order to keep Canadian labour costs low and benefit from US contracts. Among the lucrative contracts from the south are a wide array of "defense" deals. Arms manufacturing in Canada is one of the country's fastest growing industries. With Martin as Finance Minister, the Canada Pension Plan invested $2.55 billion in arms manufacturers, including weapons used in Iraq and Afghanistan. Martin has also repeatedly shown his intention of joining the US missile defence plan.

Quite a guy, this prime minister of ours, eh! :ph34r:

This is a good way to get all of us conservatives to vote for him. :rolleyes:

RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game")

--

Posted

I don't think bigdude was trying to get people to vote for Paul Martin... bigdude's an enthusiastic NDP supporter. I think he was probably just trying to spur some discussion about Paul Martin.

I've also tried to spur some discussion about Paul Martin lately, but failed. I've attacked his record... I've disparaged his manhood in terms that would make Linda Trimble shout "reverse sexism!" from the rooftops. A few days ago, I posted a rather negative view of Paul Martin's first 18 months as Prime Minister, and given the number of avid Liberals on this forum, I was sure that there'd be no shortage of people wanting to take issue with at least some of it. Nope. Not a single response.

I'm kind of getting the impression that Paul Martin's greatest strength is that he's not Stephen Harper. In discussing why they prefer Martin over Harper, people on this forum focus on Harper's negatives, because the discussion of Martin's positives would be ... rather short.

I'm not sure if "Mr Dithers" was the right gloss to put on the guy. I think "Mr Milquetoast" is probably closer to the truth. But at least he's not Harper... and I guess in a lot of people's minds that's good enough.

-k

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Friendly forum facilitator! ┬──┬◡ノ(° -°ノ)

Posted
bigdude's an enthusiastic NDP supporter.

WOW! an enthusiastic NDP supporter, step back everyone there aren't many of these and we don't want to have them become extinct. I mean wow how much longer are you going to be able to see one of these in the wild?

Posted

That enriching the wealthy part is amusing. A quick calculation will show you that $569 of $15,000/year is 3.79%, $4000 of $125,000/year oddly enough is 3.2%. That's over half a point lower than the percentage the single mother is getting back. Who here supports equality?

Posted

If Layton is on the ball we will see Mr. Dithers sweating the small stuff if the NDP budget gets delayed. This one's got to get activated real soon not like all the $$$$ promised over 5,8,10 or in the case of airport taxes,full reduction 4o years from now. Layton will pull the plug on Liberal support if PM delays. How can a government promise monies way beyond their mandate? I guess 5 billion over 5 years sounds better than 1 billion in one year. To bad the primary budget won't start to get processed until March 2006. :(

"Any man under 30 who is not a liberal has no heart, and any man over 30 who is not a conservative has no brains."

— Winston Churchill

Posted

It's too bad this website is not active at the moment.

I remember when it first started and Dithers threatened to sue the 3 young, non-aligned to any party politically, guys from the Maritimes.

Eventually the threatened Liberal lawsuit became the story, the website got massive free publicity, and Dithers dithered, and did nothing. :lol:

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,906
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Henry Blackstone
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Doowangle earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Doowangle earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...