Why all the worldwide turmoil? (9/11 thread)

[Omni]

Just now, hot enough said:

Nice distractions. How do you maintain enough focus to fly a plane? 

Nanothermite being at WTC means that the official story is bunk. All the molten steel, all the iron microspheres means that the three towers were brought down by controlled demolition. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to grasp that the alleged hijackers could not have done those controlled demolitions. 

But evidently, it escapes a pilot. 

So you continue to fail to answer direct questions. Carry on with your conspiracy notions.

[hot enough]

23 minutes ago, Omni said:

So you continue to fail to answer direct questions. Carry on with your conspiracy notions.

I know all the crap that you are trying to use to distract from the myriad impossibilities in the official fable. Let's follow your schtick for a moment. Allowing everything up to the initiation of collapse, it is still absolutely impossible for the three towers to fall at free fall and at continued acceleration. The twin towers' blocks were blown to smithereens.

There were no intact blocks to cause any substantial weight/momentum on the much much bigger and much much stronger lower blocks. They were powder shortly after the collapse began. You can see that on WTC1 because the antenna went inside. It was sitting on a massive hat truss that held the towers together at the top and that hat truss should have been visible for most of the ride to the bottom, with the antenna sitting atop it. 

On WTC2, the tipping HUGE floor section could never have been brought back within the tower's midline once it had fallen/tipped that far out. But it was demolished by explosives and it formed part of the falling debris field, within which explosions could be seen. 

All done by the superthermite, the US non-commercially available nanothermite which caused molten steel, vaporized steel, molten molybdenum, vaporized lead, iron microspheres, all of which are not possible with the official story.

Edited April 25, 2017 by hot enough

[Wilber]

Now it's superthermite, plain old nanothermite wasn't good enough

 

[Omni]

2 hours ago, hot enough said:

All done by the superthermite, the US non-commercially available nanothermite which caused molten steel, vaporized steel, molten molybdenum, vaporized lead, iron microspheres, all of which are not possible with the official story.

All of this is explained by the actual science I have already forwarded you. Now, one way to demolish a tower is to blow up and weaken the structure some distance below the top of the structure and let the top part collapse and take out the remaining floors. It puts it all in a neat pile in a relatively small footprint and is much quicker than taking it apart piece by piece. So in the WTC case, the same process was used except they used fast airplanes laden with lots of fuel instead of explosives. Now, another question you have hidden from forever is how fast were those planes going when they hit and why did that exceed the design parameters built into the towers? 

[hot enough]

43 minutes ago, Wilber said:

Now it's superthermite, plain old nanothermite wasn't good enough

 

Don't tell me that a bright guy like you, Wilber, doesn't know about the new superthermites, the new generation of explosives.

I'm just joking of course. 

[hot enough]

9 minutes ago, Omni said:

Now, one way to demolish a tower is to blow up and weaken the structure some distance below the top of the structure and let the top part collapse and take out the remaining floors.

Go on. 

[hot enough]

9 minutes ago, Omni said:

So in the WTC case, the same process was used except they used fast airplanes laden with lots of fuel instead of explosives.

Explain how that happened. 

[Omni]

Just now, hot enough said:

Explain how that happened. 

Um, terrorist hijacked and then drove big planes at high speed into tall buildings not far below the top and then the top came down and pancaked the rest. Kind of a bad ass Batman theme perhaps.

[Omni]

46 minutes ago, Wilber said:

Now it's superthermite, plain old nanothermite wasn't good enough

 

C'mon Wilber, surely you have heard of superthermite. It's manufactured on Alpha Centauri but only the US government has access to it.

[hot enough]

8 minutes ago, Omni said:

Um, terrorist hijacked and then drove big planes at high speed into tall buildings not far below the top and then the top came down and pancaked the rest. Kind of a bad ass Batman theme perhaps.

Pancake theory was thrown out by NIST as impossible after it was first brought in by the USGOCT and put out there for all the noobs to jump on and pretend they knew something. 

[Omni]

Just now, hot enough said:

Pancake theory was thrown out by NIST as impossible after it was first brought in by the USGOCT and put out there for all the noobs to jump on and pretend they knew something. 

Do you ever plan to answer the question as to aircraft speed?

[hot enough]

7 minutes ago, Omni said:

C'mon Wilber, surely you have heard of superthermite. It's manufactured on Alpha Centauri but only the US government has access to it.

Are you really trying to suggest that you haven't heard of the new generation of superthermites, Omni? Come on, you two are PILOTS!

[Omni]

2 minutes ago, hot enough said:

Are you really trying to suggest that you haven't heard of the new generation of superthermites, Omni? Come on, you two are PILOTS!

I even showed you how you can make them at home. And if you try it there you can see how the amount of heat generated by a collapsing building as big as the WTC towers would explain the molten metal.

[hot enough]

5 minutes ago, Omni said:

I even showed you how you can make them at home. And if you try it there you can see how the amount of heat generated by a collapsing building as big as the WTC towers would explain the molten metal.

You obviously don't understand what nanothermite is. Do you even know what thermite is? There was no legal/legitimate reason for regular thermite to be at WTC. 

[Omni]

1 minute ago, hot enough said:

You obviously don't understand what nanothermite is. Do you even know what thermite is? There was no legal/legitimate reason for regular thermite to be at WTC. 

I have already pointed out what the source of the microspheres at the WTC. And I see you continue to dance around the questions of aircraft speed and related design criteria, so I have to assume you will follow your narrow minded conspiracy theory ideas that have been put in your head forever. No sense wasting more of my time with trying to educate you.

[Wilber]

9 minutes ago, hot enough said:

Are you really trying to suggest that you haven't heard of the new generation of superthermites, Omni? Come on, you two are PILOTS!

Nope, never in the military. Blowing things up isn't part of a civilian pilot's job description. My guess is it isn't in yours either.

 

[hot enough]

18 minutes ago, Omni said:

I have already pointed out what the source of the microspheres at the WTC.

Is this the "aluminum planes and iron on all the steel and in the collapse they combined to make some aluminum/steel microspheres" theory?

[Omni]

2 minutes ago, hot enough said:

Is this the "aluminum planes and iron on all the steel and in the collapse they combined to make some aluminum/steel microspheres" theory?

Or you could just put a match to fine steel wool. Any progress on those airspeeds or does that frighten you?

[hot enough]

28 minutes ago, Omni said:

And if you try it there you can see how the amount of heat generated by a collapsing building as big as the WTC towers would explain the molten metal.

It's good to see that you at least possess the honesty and presence of mind to acknowledge the molten steel at WTC. 

[Omni]

Just now, hot enough said:

It's good to see that you at least possess the honesty and presence of mind to acknowledge the molten steel at WTC. 

Airspeeds?

[hot enough]

8 minutes ago, Omni said:

Is this the "aluminum planes and iron on all the steel and in the collapse they combined to make some aluminum/steel microspheres" theory?

You didn't answer the above question. 

[hot enough]

8 minutes ago, Omni said:

Airspeeds?

Well, what do you say they were and of what importance is it?

[Omni]

Just now, hot enough said:

You didn't answer the above question. 

I've explained that already. Now on to airspeeds.

[hot enough]

6 minutes ago, Omni said:

I've explained that already. 

You didn't answer the question, nor have you explained anything. 

Is this the "aluminum planes and iron on all the steel and in the collapse they combined to make some aluminum/steel microspheres" theory?

[Omni]

4 minutes ago, hot enough said:

Well, what do you say they were and of what importance is it?

I'm sure you have heard of the word momentum. I won't trouble you with the scientific formulae related but lets just say if you knocked on someones door with your fist in the normal way, and then with the same fist, you took a Mohamed Ali swing at the same door you might just punch a hole right through it. Well if you take an airplane and run it into a building at 250 knots, you would do some damage obviously. But if you took the same airplane and hit the building at ~twice that speed you would do a lot more damage. The WTC buildings were within whats called a TRSA, which means they were close to an airport, but more importantly the speed within a TRSA is 250 knots. So when the WTC designers made their construction plans one of the parameter they used was to deal with an airliner impact at 250 kts. One of the designers I heard interviewd said to this day we couldn't build a tower that would withstand a 767 collision at double that speed. That's roughly the speeds the airliners hit the buildings. Apparently the terrorist hijackers weren't following FAA regulations.