?Impact Posted May 29, 2016 Report Share Posted May 29, 2016 (edited) natives who don't own the land, but live nearby It is worth noting that Glacier Resorts Ltd. don't own the land either, they want to develop crown land. I am only pointing out that the public, especially the public that lives nearby, should have as much (nay, more so) say in the development of public lands as a far away corporate entity that only sees the exploitation of public land as the ticket to a fast buck. Edited May 29, 2016 by ?Impact Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
overthere Posted May 29, 2016 Author Report Share Posted May 29, 2016 I suppose the sarcasm either carried through too well or not at all. Nice conflating of policies there though - completely useless to do that but partisans gotta partisan-take I suppose.... Having a viable economy in Canada is partisan? Colour me guilty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msj Posted May 29, 2016 Report Share Posted May 29, 2016 Having a viable economy in Canada is partisan? Colour me guilty. Conflating jurisdictional issues and blaming a political party that has been in power for a short time is certainly partisan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argus Posted May 29, 2016 Report Share Posted May 29, 2016 It is worth noting that Glacier Resorts Ltd. don't own the land either, they want to develop crown land. I am only pointing out that the public, especially the public that lives nearby, should have as much (nay, more so) say in the development of public lands as a far away corporate entity that only sees the exploitation of public land as the ticket to a fast buck. For twenty years? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.