Shell Plc casts fresh doubt on B.C. LNG project due to 'funding&#3

[?Impact]

natives who don't own the land, but live nearby

It is worth noting that Glacier Resorts Ltd. don't own the land either, they want to develop crown land. I am only pointing out that the public, especially the public that lives nearby, should have as much (nay, more so) say in the development of public lands as a far away corporate entity that only sees the exploitation of public land as the ticket to a fast buck.

Edited May 29, 2016 by ?Impact

[overthere]

I suppose the sarcasm either carried through too well or not at all.

Nice conflating of policies there though - completely useless to do that but partisans gotta partisan-take I suppose....

Having a viable economy in Canada is partisan?

Colour me guilty.

[msj]

Having a viable economy in Canada is partisan?

Colour me guilty.

Conflating jurisdictional issues and blaming a political party that has been in power for a short time is certainly partisan.

[Argus]

It is worth noting that Glacier Resorts Ltd. don't own the land either, they want to develop crown land. I am only pointing out that the public, especially the public that lives nearby, should have as much (nay, more so) say in the development of public lands as a far away corporate entity that only sees the exploitation of public land as the ticket to a fast buck.

For twenty years?