jewish children throw stones at mother and baby

[bud]

there are plenty of videos of these events online. lovely actions, some by young children. these settlers, numbering in the hundreds of thousands, engage in daily assaults of palestinian people and palestinian property such as farmland, homes and mosques.

remember though, this is just a tiny teensy weensy eenie meenie fringe minority of "extremists".

[bud]

here are more of these jewish children and their jewish mothers attacking palestinians:

remember though, this is just a teeny weeny percentage of jews!

[kraychik]

Looks like I touched with a nerve. The truth upsets you.

You really want to go there, though? You want to start posting videos of "Palestinian" kids saying and doing despicable things? Assaulting people, chanting "death to Jews!", dressed up as suicide bombers, etc? There are literally hundreds if not thousands of different videos documenting this that are easily accessible, because it so widespread and systemic in their culture and society. There's really no comparison between Israeli society and "Palestinian" society. There is no moral equivalence.

[Guest Peeves]

I think they're welcoming by throwing candy, sweet meats, dates and nuts. Or perhaps it's another faked photo op. Lots of those too.

Still if they are throwing stones who threw them first?

[bud]

Looks like I touched with a nerve. The truth upsets you.

no. it doesn't touch a nerve. i've seen enough of you bigots and racists on the net to know that you're crawling everywhere. it's a good thing though, that you're a screaming minority and most do not agree with your racist propaganda.

my post was to show how stupid it is to generalize and label a group of people, based on the actions of a very very small percentage of people. but you're too stupid to realize this because you're so consumed with your tribalistic zealotry. carry on with your hate agenda.

[Guest American Woman]

my post was to show how stupid it is to generalize and label a group of people, based on the actions of a very very small percentage of people.

Oh. My. God. Could I laugh any harder?

but you're too stupid to realize this because you're so consumed with your tribalistic zealotry. carry on with your hate agenda.

Yep. Evidently I can.

:lol:

[bud]

are all jewish children like this?

[Michael Hardner]

If one side stones 3 children and the other stones 20 - do we have some kind of proof of ... something ?

[dre]

If one side stones 3 children and the other stones 20 - do we have some kind of proof of ... something ?

Yup!

1. 23 kids got stoned

2. Rocks are readily available.

[GostHacked]

Yup!

1. 23 kids got stoned

2. Rocks are readily available.

As horrible as it is to laugh at this, facts are facts I guess.

[bud]

If one side stones 3 children and the other stones 20 - do we have some kind of proof of ... something ?

are you going off on a tangent or are you insinuating that i'm posting these videos to get into a pissing match? because if you are not going off on a tangent, then as noted before, i posted this thread to show that generalizing a whole ethnic or religious group, based on the actions of a few is moronic. also, i used an example of something that they're familiar with and have an emotional investment in.

[Michael Hardner]

are you going off on a tangent or are you insinuating that i'm posting these videos to get into a pissing match?

It's already a pissing match. I would say that this round was started with the posting of several threads describing "Muslim" crimes.

because if you are not going off on a tangent, then as noted before, i posted this thread to show that generalizing a whole ethnic or religious group, based on the actions of a few is moronic. also, i used an example of something that they're familiar with and have an emotional investment in.

Right. I support the idea that threads showing 'generalizing' such as this is moronic. Maybe you can start a thread that is religion-neutral that says exactly that. Those of us who support that can 'bump' the thread when the anti-group threads are started by those drive-by posters who start them, then leave.

[bud]

It's already a pissing match. I would say that this round was started with the posting of several threads describing "Muslim" crimes.

pissing match would be, "your stone throwing children throw more stones than their stone throwing children". but that's not the intention of this thread. the intention is not to have a pissing match, but to flip the table and show the tragedy of generalization from another perspective.

Right. I support the idea that threads showing 'generalizing' such as this is moronic. Maybe you can start a thread that is religion-neutral that says exactly that. Those of us who support that can 'bump' the thread when the anti-group threads are started by those drive-by posters who start them, then leave.

i appreciate your perspective. perhaps you can start a thread that works with how you think the message can be delivered. i prefer this approach instead.

Edited September 26, 2012 by bud

[kraychik]

Maybe you can start a thread that is religion-neutral that says exactly that. Those of us who support that can 'bump' the thread when the anti-group threads are started by those drive-by posters who start them, then leave.

Because all religions are the same, right? There's a moral equivalence that is shared by all religions? That's your position?

[Guest Peeves]

It's already a pissing match. I would say that this round was started with the posting of several threads describing "Muslim" crimes.

Right. I support the idea that threads showing 'generalizing' such as this is moronic. Maybe you can start a thread that is religion-neutral that says exactly that. Those of us who support that can 'bump' the thread when the anti-group threads are started by those drive-by posters who start them, then leave.

Not to be picayune.. well ok to be picayune, if it's a "crime" as you said, it remains so regardless any religious/cultural/tribal/sectarian affiliation.

If it's a terrorist group, or an honor killing or a wife beating or any other crime the (described),religion et al is a factor IF

it's a religious or cultural factor attributed as an additional point above the essential point, that it is a crime first and foremost.

One of course may suspect an agenda or bias, but that does not usually negate, diminish, or minimize the deed.

Edited September 26, 2012 by Peeves

[Guest Peeves]

If one side stones 3 children and the other stones 20 - do we have some kind of proof of ... something ?

Yup, don't live in a glass house.

[Michael Hardner]

Because all religions are the same, right? There's a moral equivalence that is shared by all religions? That's your position?

No, not all religions are the same. And I think I understand why some people need to feel better than others. But it's not always necessary, or admirable to take sides.

[bud]

No, not all religions are the same. And I think I understand why some people need to feel better than others. But it's not always necessary, or admirable to take sides.

but it's necessary to take the side of justice and the truth.