cybercoma Posted June 14, 2012 Report Posted June 14, 2012 (edited) More hypocrisy from the CPC camp. Remember when Vic Toews and the CPC government was livid over public documents being posted on Twitter? Well Jason Kenney has posted the personal details of a refugee on the web, while simultaneously criticizing La Presse for not getting a privacy waiver for their story. Kenney didn't get the waiver either. http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/1211053--jason-kenney-publicizes-colombian-refugee-s-private-data-over-disputed-news-story On Tuesday, Kenney posted the letter chastising the article and chiding Nicoud for not calling immigration or obtaining a privacy waiver from Martinez to get the full story.It posted a link to Martinez’ asylum decision along with a summary of her criminal past, about her 15-plus aliases and credibility issue. Edited June 14, 2012 by cybercoma Quote
Fletch 27 Posted June 14, 2012 Report Posted June 14, 2012 I TOTALLY agree with publishing this refugees (and convicted criminal who committed haeinous acts) "private data"... When the "La press" tries to put a pitty-spin on her deportation, simple... Let THE FACTS speak! La-press was pushing for her to stay on grounds of family ties, "she was a good girl"... WELL, the facts speak louder than La-Press words! ANY Canadian who looks at her profile would say AMEN!!!!!! Kick her ass outa here... She not a citizen and she IS a criminal... Good for Kenney for showing true transparency on this important item. Imagine she stayed and killed a child?? "Oooo, why didn't we know of her horrible criminal past"???? Shame on stupidity... With transparency shown again, this (stupidity) will not happen.... Did you even READ the article and check this cruel womans past? More hypocrisy from the CPC camp. Remember when Vic Toews and the CPC government was livid over public documents being posted on Twitter? Well Jason Kenney has posted the personal details of a refugee on the web, while simultaneously criticizing La Presse for not getting a privacy waiver for their story. Kenney didn't get the waiver either. http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/1211053--jason-kenney-publicizes-colombian-refugee-s-private-data-over-disputed-news-story Quote
cybercoma Posted June 14, 2012 Author Report Posted June 14, 2012 Transparency on Vic Toews court files: bad. Transparency on refugee's past: good. Got it. Feltch is a hypocrite. Quote
BubberMiley Posted June 14, 2012 Report Posted June 14, 2012 I TOTALLY agree with publishing this refugees (and convicted criminal who committed haeinous acts) "private data"... You think Kenney was wrong when he criticized la Presse? Quote "I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Rick Posted June 14, 2012 Report Posted June 14, 2012 Transparency on Vic Toews court files: bad. Transparency on refugee's past: good. Got it. Feltch is a hypocrite. Anonymous needs to get back to work...And start revealing private details of Jason Kenney's sordid life.. Or John Baird's closet... Quote “This is all about who you represent,” Mr. Dewar (NDP) said. “We’re (NDP) talking about representing the interests of working people and everyday Canadians and they [the Conservatives] are about representing the fund managers who come in and fleece our companies and our country. Voted Maple Leaf Web's 'Most Outstanding Poster' 2011
Anti-Am Posted June 14, 2012 Report Posted June 14, 2012 With the big deal the conservatives made about the liberal staffer publishing Vic Toews sordid affair and criminality.. I don't see how this makes them look good Quote
Rick Posted June 14, 2012 Report Posted June 14, 2012 With the big deal the conservatives made about the liberal staffer publishing Vic Toews sordid affair and criminality.. I don't see how this makes them look good It doesn't but that won't stop them from living their delusional lives as though it does.What this really says is, only wealthy foreign criminals are welcomed in Harperland.... Convicted criminals who are friends of the Conservatives like Conrad Black, for instance Quote “This is all about who you represent,” Mr. Dewar (NDP) said. “We’re (NDP) talking about representing the interests of working people and everyday Canadians and they [the Conservatives] are about representing the fund managers who come in and fleece our companies and our country. Voted Maple Leaf Web's 'Most Outstanding Poster' 2011
Argus Posted June 14, 2012 Report Posted June 14, 2012 Transparency on Vic Toews court files: bad. Transparency on refugee's past: good. Got it. Feltch is a hypocrite. Not quite the same thing. And if you recall, I said we should know about a guy being an adulterer. Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
Anti-Am Posted June 14, 2012 Report Posted June 14, 2012 Not quite the same thing. And if you recall, I said we should know about a guy being an adulterer. Oh fricking yes it is the same thing Quote
Keepitsimple Posted June 15, 2012 Report Posted June 15, 2012 From the article: “Ms. Martinez has a long, public record in front of criminal and civil courts in Canada and the United States. We are releasing only the public information.” Quote Back to Basics
Anti-Am Posted June 15, 2012 Report Posted June 15, 2012 From the article: And only public information on Vic Toews was released which prompted a witch hunt. It's a double standard, hey we can do it, you can't. Quote
Battletoads Posted June 15, 2012 Report Posted June 15, 2012 And only public information on Vic Toews was released which prompted a witch hunt. It's a double standard, hey we can do it, you can't. Conservatives? Double standards? Say it ain't so Quote "You can lead a Conservative to knowledge, but you can't make him think."
Fletch 27 Posted June 15, 2012 Report Posted June 15, 2012 Vic had a divorce as a Canadian Citizen... This chick was convicted of countless fellonies.. As an "entrant to canada".. Same thing hugh? You sir, could pass for a grape-fruit at Canada customs... And only public information on Vic Toews was released which prompted a witch hunt. It's a double standard, hey we can do it, you can't. Quote
guyser Posted June 15, 2012 Report Posted June 15, 2012 Vic had a divorce as a Canadian Citizen... This chick was convicted of countless fellonies.. As an "entrant to canada".. Same thing hugh? You sir, could pass for a grape-fruit at Canada customs... Maybe you should understand a few things (actually a metric load but) Anyone on CDN soil is subject to the same laws, same treatment, same right to privacy. Quote
jacee Posted June 15, 2012 Report Posted June 15, 2012 It doesn't but that won't stop them from living their delusional lives as though it does. What this really says is, only wealthy foreign criminals are welcomed in Harperland.... Convicted criminals who are friends of the Conservatives like Conrad Black, for instance Good one! Quote
TimG Posted June 15, 2012 Report Posted June 15, 2012 Anyone on CDN soil is subject to the same laws, same treatment, same right to privacy.Sorry - if you agree to let a journalist write a completely on sided view of a situation and use that to publically condemn the government then the government has the right AND the obligation to release all relevant details so people can make a reasonable judgement. If people want the government to respect their privacy then they should not make unfounded claims in the media. Quote
Guest Peeves Posted June 15, 2012 Report Posted June 15, 2012 (edited) Maybe you should understand a few things (actually a metric load but) Anyone on CDN soil is subject to the same laws, same treatment, same right to privacy. Same right to law, but, a refugee claimant must be A) a real refugee (meet all tests) Not a criminal. C) I want to know if the refugee claimant is bogus. D) Kenny represents Canadian citizens first. Good for Kenny. Edited June 15, 2012 by Peeves Quote
Guest Peeves Posted June 15, 2012 Report Posted June 15, 2012 Sorry - if you agree to let a journalist write a completely on sided view of a situation and use that to publically condemn the government then the government has the right AND the obligation to release all relevant details so people can make a reasonable judgement. If people want the government to respect their privacy then they should not make unfounded claims in the media. Well said. If accusations are made,a government baited,a selected self serving viewpoint printed, then an explanation is indeed reasonably expected to be forthcoming. To accept the agitprop without response would not a policy ANY government or party would ignore. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.