olp1fan Posted December 12, 2011 Report Posted December 12, 2011 (edited) Yeah, Harper's government is totally tough on crime alright Unsuccessful criminals are still criminals No consequences ...sigh http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/rahim-jaffer-broke-lobbying-rules/article2268315/ Former Conservative MP and caucus chairman Rahim Jaffer conducted unregistered lobbying activities on behalf of his company inside the Harper government, in breach of the Lobbyists’ Code of Conduct, according to watchdog Karen Shepherd. In a report released on Monday, the Lobbying Commissioner criticized the actions of Mr. Jaffer and his business partner, Patrick Glémaud, who were at the heart of a major political controversy that also engulfed Mr. Jaffer’s wife, former MP Helena Guergis. “Although Mr. Glémaud and Mr. Jaffer were not successful in securing more than $178-million in government funding that they were seeking, their activities required registration,” Ms. Shepherd writes. “This report shows that registration is required even if the desired outcome is not achieved.” Mr. Jaffer and Mr. Glémaud will not face any penalties as a result, as the report pointed out that “breaches of the Code carry no fines or jail terms.” The RCMP investigated the matter, but determined that the file was not strong enough for prosecution. “In a letter received on March 29, 2011, the RCMP advised me that they had closed their file due to the potential limitations for prosecution under the Lobbying Act,” Ms. Shepherd wrote. The Conservatives have shown little sympathy toward Mr. Jaffer since the start of the controversy. In a statement, the Prime Minister’s Office emphasized the fact that Mr. Jaffer and Mr. Glémaud “did not secure any government funding.” “Our government put in place tough laws to ensure lobbying in Canada takes place above board and according to the rules. That is why we referred all non-reported meetings to the Lobbying Commissioner of Canada for her review,” said PMO spokesman Andrew MacDougall. But Stephen Harper’s former chief of staff, lawyer and lobbying expert Guy Giorno, used his Twitter feed to state that the failure to obtain federal funding is not an excuse in this case. “Sorry, even ineffective lobbyists must register,” Mr. Giorno said. Ms. Shepherd concluded that Mr. Jaffer and Mr. Glémaud conducted lobbying activities on a number of occasions, such as the time in 2010 that they communicated with the office of then-environment minister Jim Prentice, seeking $600,000 in funding for a company called RLP Energy Inc. The report found that the communications “were not performed as an act of kindness, or on a voluntary basis.” Overall, the report said that Mr. Jaffer and Mr. Glémaud’s company, GPG, submitted three proposals under the Green Infrastructure Fund worth a total of $178-million. “Evidence obtained during the course of the investigation demonstrates that Mr. Glémaud and Mr. Jaffer communicated with federal public office holders in respect of the awarding of grants, contributions or other financial benefits,” the report said. In response to the report, Mr. Glémaud blamed the “often ambiguous provisions” of the Lobbying Act. And Mr. Jaffer expressed his concern over the fact the Commissioner of Lobbying pursued her investigation even though the RCMP has decided not to lay any charges. The NDP, meanwhile, blasted the fact that the legislation does not include any penalties for breaches to the Lobbyists’ Code of Conduct. “We’re not at all satisfied with the outcome of today’s findings,” Winnipeg MP Pat Martin said. His colleague, Alexandre Boulerice, added that the legislation should be amended to include penalties. Edited December 12, 2011 by olp1fan Quote
Scotty Posted December 12, 2011 Report Posted December 12, 2011 Speaking of breaking rules. The use of "Con" for Conservatives is against the rules, and you do it consistently. Maybe you should consider no longer breaking the rules... Quote It is an inverted moral calculus that tries to persuade the world to demonize one state that tries its civilized best to abide in a difficult time and place, and rides merrily by the examples and practices of dozens of states and leaderships that drop into brutality every day without a twinge of regret or a whisper of condemnation. - Rex Murphy
olp1fan Posted December 13, 2011 Author Report Posted December 13, 2011 Speaking of breaking rules. The use of "Con" for Conservatives is against the rules, and you do it consistently. Maybe you should consider no longer breaking the rules... I suppose "Dipper" for NDP is against the rules too then but yet every right winger I've seen post uses it consistently Anyways, that would be one stupid rule seeing as Liberals are Libs so therefore Conservatives would be Cons Quote
Jerry J. Fortin Posted December 13, 2011 Report Posted December 13, 2011 I surely proves that the Conservatives know how to "SPIN" a story. They are indeed the masters of politics in this country. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.