William Ashley Posted August 26, 2011 Report Posted August 26, 2011 (edited) http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/world/votes+scrap+hated/5313478/story.html I wonder how much that is going to cost. Why stop at the HST.. keep going BC.. become tax free!!! It is interesting to wonder if you could outvote taxes, would the public vote down taxes? I feel like if given the option the majority would opt to vote down a lot more taxes. Could this be a model for the future? This should make Washington state happy. Edited August 26, 2011 by William Ashley Quote I was here.
Smallc Posted August 26, 2011 Report Posted August 26, 2011 This will probably be bad for the BC economy, and the Canadian economy in general. Quote
segnosaur Posted August 26, 2011 Report Posted August 26, 2011 Why stop at the HST.. keep going BC.. become tax free!!! The fact that people are objecting to one tax measure/tax grab, does not necessarily mean that they are objecting to all tax measures. I could say "I don't mind paying 30% income tax" and still object if the government decided to raise it to 40%. I feel like if given the option the majority would opt to vote down a lot more taxes. Quite possibly. Not necessarily saying it would be a good model or bad. It does run the risk of handcuffing the government. Frankly, I'd like to see more effort put into explaining to people what the cause/effect is of various spending and tax programs. (Something along the lines of "If you want program X, be prepared to pay $Y out of your pocket".) Quote
CitizenX Posted August 26, 2011 Report Posted August 26, 2011 (edited) BC people don't believe in trickle down economics, and hate being lied to. What's next... an Election call? Good bye Christy Clark and the BC Neo-Liberals. Edited August 26, 2011 by CitizenX Quote "The rich people have their lobbyists and the poor people have their feet." The price of apathy towards public affairs is to be ruled by evil men. - Plato
Vineon Posted August 26, 2011 Report Posted August 26, 2011 Can the rest of Canada get the 2 billions federal subsidy back that BC got for harmonizing their sales taxes now? Quote
segnosaur Posted August 26, 2011 Report Posted August 26, 2011 Can the rest of Canada get the 2 billions federal subsidy back that BC got for harmonizing their sales taxes now? Good question. What exactly did BC do with the subsidy it received? (Ontario basically used the money to send cheques to taxpayers... kind of like bribery.) Quote
Wilber Posted August 26, 2011 Report Posted August 26, 2011 Can the rest of Canada get the 2 billions federal subsidy back that BC got for harmonizing their sales taxes now? It was 1.6 billion and it will have to be paid back. Kevin Falcon said today that a repayment schedule will be negotiated with the Feds. It will be interesting to see what form the PST will take when it is restored. Just about everyone agrees it needs improving no matter how they stood on the HST. It's too bad that Campbell was such a devious arrogant SOB in the way he imposed it. More than any other reason, that is why it failed. Quote "Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC
TimG Posted August 26, 2011 Report Posted August 26, 2011 (edited) It's too bad that Campbell was such a devious arrogant SOB in the way he imposed it. More than any other reason, that is why it failed.Sure, some of the voters of BC are vindictive immature children who would shot themselves in the foot to punish a politician who is long gone. Others are people who are fundamentally selfish and think taxes should be always paid by someone else. Edited August 26, 2011 by TimG Quote
CitizenX Posted August 26, 2011 Report Posted August 26, 2011 It's too bad that Campbell was such a devious arrogant SOB in the way he imposed it. More than any other reason, that is why it failed. Trickle down economics doesn't work. People are sick of governments giving big business tax breaks in the hope of jobs that never come. The HST is out, next comes the BC Neo-Liberals. :angry: Quote "The rich people have their lobbyists and the poor people have their feet." The price of apathy towards public affairs is to be ruled by evil men. - Plato
CitizenX Posted August 26, 2011 Report Posted August 26, 2011 (edited) Sure, some of the voters of BC are vindictive immature children who would shot themselves in the foot to punish a politician who is long gone. Others are people who are fundamentally selfish and think taxes should be always paid by someone else. Wrong on both counts. BC citizens are finally standing up and saying No more. The government is suppose to work on behalf of the people not Corporations. Also those other people you are talking about that are fundamentally selfish,and think taxes should be always paid by someone else are Corporations. Edited August 26, 2011 by CitizenX Quote "The rich people have their lobbyists and the poor people have their feet." The price of apathy towards public affairs is to be ruled by evil men. - Plato
Smallc Posted August 26, 2011 Report Posted August 26, 2011 Wrong on both counts. BC citizens are finally standing up and saying No more. The government is suppose to work on behalf of the people not Corporations. And who are the people supposed to work for? Quote
TimG Posted August 26, 2011 Report Posted August 26, 2011 (edited) The government is suppose to work on behalf of the people not Corporations.IOW, you are one of those fundamentally selfish people who think that only other people (or corporations) should pay taxes. Sorry, standing up to demand that someone else pay more taxes is not nobel by any stretch of the imagination. It is pure, self interested greed on your part. Edited August 26, 2011 by TimG Quote
Tilter Posted August 27, 2011 Report Posted August 27, 2011 Trickle down economics doesn't work. People are sick of governments giving big business tax breaks in the hope of jobs that never come. The HST is out, next comes the BC Neo-Liberals. :angry: where are the 60,000 new jobs that the Ontario HST was supposed to have created? The hst is the most unfair tax imposed on poorer people. It's 13% of our income and only about .01% of anyone earning 150,000 bux a year. Quote
CitizenX Posted August 27, 2011 Report Posted August 27, 2011 IOW, you are one of those fundamentally selfish people who think that only other people (or corporations) should pay taxes. Sorry, standing up to demand that someone else pay more taxes is not nobel by any stretch of the imagination. It is pure, self interested greed on your part. If I were paying 95% of income on one tax or another I shouldn't complain either right? I'm just being selfish, and greedy right? I've pegged you as a conservative Haperite. I find it funny that conservatives are all for tax cuts as long as it's for big business, and smaller government only where business is concerned. Sorry but the BC Neo-Liberals lost this fight and hopefully the next election. Quote "The rich people have their lobbyists and the poor people have their feet." The price of apathy towards public affairs is to be ruled by evil men. - Plato
TimG Posted August 27, 2011 Report Posted August 27, 2011 (edited) If I were paying 95% of income on one tax or another I shouldn't complain either right?But you aren't.I find it funny that conservatives are all for tax cuts as long as it's for big business, and smaller government only where business is concerned.Perhaps because the evidence shows that what is good for business is good for the economy.The trouble with people like you is think there is this endless pot of money that can pay for whatever you want and it costs you nothing. You live in a fantasy land. And yes, the referendum was a victory for narrow minded self-centered greed. There is no other reason to oppose a tax which most economists agree is more efficient and better for the economy. Greed and a belief that others should pay for the services that you want to use. Edited August 27, 2011 by TimG Quote
CitizenX Posted August 27, 2011 Report Posted August 27, 2011 But you aren't. Perhaps because the evidence shows that what is good for business is good for the economy. The trouble with people like you is think there is this endless pot of money that can pay for whatever you want and it costs you nothing. You live in a fantasy land. And yes, the referendum was a victory for narrow minded self-centered greed. There is no other reason to oppose a tax which most economists agree is more efficient and better for the economy. Greed and a belief that others should pay for the services that you want to use. This message was brought to you from the Fraser Institute (Think tank ???) Quote "The rich people have their lobbyists and the poor people have their feet." The price of apathy towards public affairs is to be ruled by evil men. - Plato
Argus Posted August 27, 2011 Report Posted August 27, 2011 where are the 60,000 new jobs that the Ontario HST was supposed to have created? The hst is the most unfair tax imposed on poorer people. It's 13% of our income and only about .01% of anyone earning 150,000 bux a year. Yeah! We were so much better off only paying 8% provincial sales tax! Well, and the 5% federal sales tax, but that's WAY less than 13% Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
TimG Posted August 27, 2011 Report Posted August 27, 2011 This message was brought to you from the Fraser InstituteSo? Is that supposed to suggest the message is some how untrue? The message is true whether you like it or not. Quote
CitizenX Posted August 27, 2011 Report Posted August 27, 2011 July 30, 2011 by theleftcoast.ca A confidential source who is very well connected inside the BC Liberal Party has informed me that if the “YES to Extinguish the HST” vote is anything over 50%, rather than repealing the HST as Gordon Campbell had previously promised, Christy Clark will call a fall election with the HST as the key issue. She will put her government on the line an effort to ask all British Columbians how they feel about the HST. It looks like the HST battle costs are going to continue to spiral upwards. Stay-tuned for a busy fall election season. Quote "The rich people have their lobbyists and the poor people have their feet." The price of apathy towards public affairs is to be ruled by evil men. - Plato
Sir Bandelot Posted August 27, 2011 Report Posted August 27, 2011 Yeah! We were so much better off only paying 8% provincial sales tax! Well, and the 5% federal sales tax, but that's WAY less than 13% The number is the same, but I'm sure you know the way the fed/provincial taxes were applied is different that the way the HST is applied. Quote
CitizenX Posted August 27, 2011 Report Posted August 27, 2011 (edited) So? Is that supposed to suggest the message is some how untrue? The message is true whether you like it or not. The message is not only untrue but tiresome propaganda that people don't believe anymore. If this tax break somehow only helped small business I might have been alright with it, but these big greedy socially irresponsible corporation deserve nothing. P.S. if it comes from the Fraser Institute it's really coming from big business which = B.S. Edited August 27, 2011 by CitizenX Quote "The rich people have their lobbyists and the poor people have their feet." The price of apathy towards public affairs is to be ruled by evil men. - Plato
Guest Derek L Posted August 27, 2011 Report Posted August 27, 2011 If I were paying 95% of income on one tax or another I shouldn't complain either right? I'm just being selfish, and greedy right? I've pegged you as a conservative Haperite. I find it funny that conservatives are all for tax cuts as long as it's for big business, and smaller government only where business is concerned. Sorry but the BC Neo-Liberals lost this fight and hopefully the next election. You’re wrong, we’re not just in favour of less tax on business, we want to have lower income tax rates also…….. Quote
CitizenX Posted August 27, 2011 Report Posted August 27, 2011 (edited) You’re wrong, we’re not just in favour of less tax on business, we want to have lower income tax rates also…….. Haa Haa yaa I saw that when Campbell (a Conservative in liberal cloths) tried to bribe the BC people with a tax break in order to keep HST. But when the polls came back as a no go...there goes the income tax break. Edited August 27, 2011 by CitizenX Quote "The rich people have their lobbyists and the poor people have their feet." The price of apathy towards public affairs is to be ruled by evil men. - Plato
Argus Posted August 27, 2011 Report Posted August 27, 2011 The number is the same, but I'm sure you know the way the fed/provincial taxes were applied is different that the way the HST is applied. If a given province, in trying to get more taxes, decides to apply the new HST to things without offsetting this, that's a problem with a dishonest government trying to slip in a tax increase, not with the HST. Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
Guest Derek L Posted August 27, 2011 Report Posted August 27, 2011 Haa Haa yaa I saw that when Campbell (a Conservative in liberal cloths) tried to bribe the BC people with a tax break in order to keep HST. But when the polls came back as a no go...there goes the income tax break. Yeah, that’s funny....what do you think the province is going to have to do about the money we got from the FEDS for HST....Where do you think the money to repay them is going to come from? Me and your parents..... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.