kimmy Posted May 1, 2011 Report Share Posted May 1, 2011 Is there a Price Is Right scoring system? I'll go with 95. -k Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Posted May 1, 2011 Report Share Posted May 1, 2011 136 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Derek L Posted May 1, 2011 Report Share Posted May 1, 2011 Is there a Price Is Right scoring system? I'll go with 95. -k If that’s the case, I'm revising my choice to 1 seat.....I want the crystal chandelier and his & hers jet skis.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperFreak Posted May 2, 2011 Report Share Posted May 2, 2011 I've heard of ballot stuffing, but never parliament stuffing. Hehe. There many ways I thought NDP might increase spending, never imagined it would be paying even more mps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hydraboss Posted May 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 2, 2011 Hehe. There many ways I thought NDP might increase spending, never imagined it would be paying even more mps. I was about to make a Belinda Stronach crack, but I think yours is better (and far more true). Nice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molly Posted May 2, 2011 Report Share Posted May 2, 2011 I'll call it 72, and guess that I'm being generous. They'll be #2 in sooooo many seats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_ON Posted May 2, 2011 Report Share Posted May 2, 2011 I'm going with 77 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybercoma Posted May 2, 2011 Report Share Posted May 2, 2011 Cyber - I think you should have gone with 309 (cause there might be bonus seats) Don't be ridiculous. They're not going to hold ALL the seats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryan Posted May 2, 2011 Report Share Posted May 2, 2011 I'll be very surprised if they can capture more than 65. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hydraboss Posted May 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 2, 2011 Added and updated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smallc Posted May 2, 2011 Report Share Posted May 2, 2011 Revision: 75 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Posted May 2, 2011 Report Share Posted May 2, 2011 (edited) NDP - 126 seats Cons - 125 seats Libs - 39 seats Bloc - 17 seats Ind - 1 seat Total - 308 seats Edited May 2, 2011 by Harry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hydraboss Posted May 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 2, 2011 Revision: 75 Okay, but that's your only mulligan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hydraboss Posted May 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 2, 2011 Added and updated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smallc Posted May 2, 2011 Report Share Posted May 2, 2011 Okay, but that's your only mulligan. I'm a waffler, what can I say? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hydraboss Posted May 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 2, 2011 Make sure your NDP seat predictions match what you put in Nittany's Election Seats thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToadBrother Posted May 2, 2011 Report Share Posted May 2, 2011 NDP - 126 seats Cons - 125 seats Libs - 39 seats Bloc - 17 seats Ind - 1 seat Total - 308 seats How much weed do you have to smoke before you come up with those numbers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shakeyhands Posted May 2, 2011 Report Share Posted May 2, 2011 96 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molly Posted May 2, 2011 Report Share Posted May 2, 2011 Make sure your NDP seat predictions match what you put in Nittany's Election Seats thread. (I_ don't_ wanna..) Okay, so make it 78 just to make the math come a litle closer to working. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nittanylionstorm07 Posted May 2, 2011 Report Share Posted May 2, 2011 (I_ don't_ wanna..) Okay, so make it 78 just to make the math come a litle closer to working. Mine would need to be changed to 130 then. (Which is pretty amazing how close I got... the 131 was a shoot from the hip, whereas the 130 was analyzing on a province/territory basis and summing up the numbers) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amorris1123 Posted May 2, 2011 Report Share Posted May 2, 2011 100-110 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amorris1123 Posted May 2, 2011 Report Share Posted May 2, 2011 Don't be ridiculous. They're not going to hold ALL the seats. Don't forget the press area.. let's tag on an additional 50 or so and just fill the house with NDP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hydraboss Posted May 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 2, 2011 Added and updated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybercoma Posted May 2, 2011 Report Share Posted May 2, 2011 Don't forget the press area.. let's tag on an additional 50 or so and just fill the house with NDP. Let's wait and see what the new House will be like during renovations. I'm not ready to put a number on it yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nittanylionstorm07 Posted May 2, 2011 Report Share Posted May 2, 2011 Let's wait and see what the new House will be like during renovations. I'm not ready to put a number on it yet. Speaking of which... what are they renovating? The Canadian House is one of, if not the most, beautiful legislative chambers in the world. (Way better looking than whatever that ugly blue carpet is in the US House). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.