Obama has suspicious number of letter-writing fans named 'Ellie Li

[naomiglover]

So it's ridiculous to even suggest that this was done by the White House? So, is this just an immense coincidence?

Tell me Shady. Were you up in arms when the previous administration, knowindly used faked evidence to justify their attack on Iraq? What about when the former administration revealed the identity of a CIA employee just to get back at her husband who spoke against the fake evidence?

Are your views on honesty limited to parties?

[Shady]

Tell me Shady. Were you up in arms when the previous administration, knowindly used faked evidence to justify their attack on Iraq? What about when the former administration revealed the identity of a CIA employee just to get back at her husband who spoke against the fake evidence?

Are your views on honesty limited to parties?

Your entire premise is false. So-called fake evidence wasn't used to justify a war in Iraq, and a former administration didn't reveal the identity of a CIA agent.

It's perfectly acceptable to suggest that certain intelligence given higher priority than others, but the CIA produced nothing that was fake.

Also, it was known for quite a while that Plame's identity was revealed Richard Armitage, not anyone from the Bush administration. That's fact.

And the only liar is the whole situation, a habitual liar, was Joe Wilson.

[naomiglover]

Your entire premise is false. So-called fake evidence wasn't used to justify a war in Iraq, and a former administration didn't reveal the identity of a CIA agent.

It's perfectly acceptable to suggest that certain intelligence given higher priority than others, but the CIA produced nothing that was fake.

Also, it was known for quite a while that Plame's identity was revealed Richard Armitage, not anyone from the Bush administration. That's fact.

And the only liar is the whole situation, a habitual liar, was Joe Wilson.

So your views on honesty is limited by parties.

[Shady]

So your views on honesty is limited by parties.

Nope, not at all. Are yours?

[naomiglover]

Nope, not at all. Are yours?

Definitely not. I don't support any particular party.

I don't come into these forums with pompoms like yourself.

[BubberMiley]

So you're willing to believe the White House would initiate a deceptive letter-writing campaign with absolutely no evidence and a lot of wild-eyed speculation, but unwilling to believe anything bad against the Bush administration even though there are reams of evidence, including the report of an independent prosecutor?

Tell me more about why you think Obama was behind the letter-writing campaign. I love reading about it.

[Shady]

So you're willing to believe the White House would initiate a deceptive letter-writing campaign with absolutely no evidence and a lot of wild-eyed speculation, but unwilling to believe anything bad against the Bush administration even though there are reams of evidence, including the report of an independent prosecutor?

Tell me more about why you think Obama was behind the letter-writing campaign. I love reading about it.

You're grossly mistaken. I didn't say that President Obama was behind the letter-writting campaign. He has more important things to do. However, the communications wing of the White House or Democratic Party is designed for this type of exercise.

After all, fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me...

The Media's Favorite Healthcare Analyst Revealed To Be On Obama's Dole

MIT economist Jonathan Gruber has become the go-to economist for fans of the health care reform wending its way through congress. He regularly produces analyses showing how great reform is going to be for people buying insurance in the individual market, and has been a vocal advocate for the excise tax. His prominence made him a natural lead-in for Ron Brownstein's recent piece on the health care bill for Atlantic Politics:

But he probably wouldn't have been cited with quite the same authority--particularly by mainstream media--if he'd been more upfront about the fact that he's being paid almost $300,000 by the Obama Administration for "special studies and analysis" of the health care.

Link

I gotta admit, paying industry professionals to shill for you policies is a very effective method of propaganda. Again, Axelrod et all should be congratulated, even though what they did was pretty bad. One can't argue it's effectiveness.

[BubberMiley]

Again, Axelrod et all should be congratulated, even though what they did was pretty bad.

Again, where's your evidence for "what they did?" All parties have shills--some paid and many, many independent, uncontrolled volunteers.

Given your topic-starting count, I wouldn't be surprised if you yourself have written hundreds upon hundreds of repetitive letters to various media outlets expressing your ODS. That's fine and please continue. I certainly wouldn't blame the GOP for your behaviour though.

I just think it's hilarious when rabid party shills think they have something on their opponent by exposing other shills.

Edited January 28, 2010 by BubberMiley

[jbg]

Tell me Shady. Were you up in arms when the previous administration, knowindly used faked evidence to justify their attack on Iraq? What about when the former administration revealed the identity of a CIA employee just to get back at her husband who spoke against the fake evidence?

Are your views on honesty limited to parties?

Are you a one-trick pony? West bad, Islam good?

[BubberMiley]

Are you a one-trick pony? West bad, Islam good?

Who said anything about the west and islam? And aren't there islamic people in the west?

[BubberMiley]

And the only liar is the whole situation, a habitual liar, was Joe Wilson.

I assume you're referring to when he broke decorum and shouted "you lie!" at the president. I agree. That was itself a lie.

Edited January 28, 2010 by BubberMiley