capricorn Posted September 25, 2009 Report Posted September 25, 2009 If he can't make the little decisions......Lord help us if he has to make a big one. According to Ignatieff, Le Prohon called him to say she preferred to compete for the nomination in Jeanne-LeBer. En point de presse, vendredi après-midi, Michael Ignatieff a soutenu que c'était Nathalie Le Prohon elle-même qui l'avait appelé en matinée pour lui dire qu'elle préférait participer à une investiture ouverte dans Jeanne-Le Ber. http://www.radio-canada.ca/nouvelles/Polit...vendredi2.shtml A little push from Le Prohon is all it took to help him along in his decision. His next challenge is to mend fences with Coderre. Quote "We always want the best man to win an election. Unfortunately, he never runs." Will Rogers
fellowtraveller Posted September 28, 2009 Report Posted September 28, 2009 (edited) He hasn't done jack all on stimulus as only 12% of the money has been spent. It could've temporarily boosted employment if the money had actually been spent. Now, construction season is over and who knows which municipality will get what they were promised. THOSE were the arguments I was making which you so conveniently declined to comment on. So, really, is it my ideological bias that is hampering the debate? It is hard to tell why your debate is hampered, maybe it is the lack of substance in your posts. Just a guess.. Like any good steward, the Tories pay for the work when the municipalities have completed their work,and invoice them on completion. Your criticism should lie with municpalities for how long they take to get through planning and implementation, and how long it takes the feds to pay when work is complete. Would you have it some other way, or is this just the usual uninformed whine?? Would you have the Tories continue the Liberal method of spreading a few hundred million to ad agencies? Did you know that the main agenda topic at the G20 summit is how to wind down the stimulus projects in every country? Edited September 28, 2009 by fellowtraveller Quote The government should do something.
Jerry J. Fortin Posted September 28, 2009 Report Posted September 28, 2009 Of course the puppet masters lending the money to the pet governments think they have spent enough for now and would rather get a few paychecks out of them before we go to the next round of the price is right. Quote
fellowtraveller Posted September 28, 2009 Report Posted September 28, 2009 As a taxpayer, I demand a larger deficit. Quote The government should do something.
KeyStone Posted September 28, 2009 Report Posted September 28, 2009 Actually that's a really smart move on Ignatieff's part. If the only reason the NDP are supporting the CPC is to see this motion pass they will have no reason to vote against the confidence motion in October. It will force the NDP to continue to support the CPC in spite of their principles or vote for an election come October. The pressure is really being put on the NDP to put their money where their mouth has been for the last year. Let's see if they have the wherewithal to do so. FYI you probably don't want to copy and paste an entire article as the mods don't like that. I don't think getting into a game of chicken with the NDP is a great idea, given that it now appears that neither party wants an election. Perhaps the two parties could sit and come to some sort of agreement rather than the perpetual accusations of propping up the Conservatives. Quote
jdobbin Posted September 28, 2009 Report Posted September 28, 2009 Perhaps the two parties could sit and come to some sort of agreement rather than the perpetual accusations of propping up the Conservatives. I think those accusations came from the NDP towards the Liberals. That would constitute perpetual. It is up the NDP now to decide if they want to go the polls. Quote
Keepitsimple Posted September 28, 2009 Report Posted September 28, 2009 If, as expected, the Liberals come out with a strongly-worded non-confidence motion - and the NDP supports the goverment....then I suspect the NDP will actually rise in the polls at the further expense of the Liberals. Putting aside all of the political machinations that only pundits seem to care about, Canadians who by and large don't want an election will find favour with the NDP action - regardless of the reasons. Left-leaning Liberals who are tiring of Mr. Ignatieff might start trickling away to the NDP. Quote Back to Basics
Shady Posted September 28, 2009 Report Posted September 28, 2009 Do the Liberals really think Canadians want another election? Are they mad? Quote
Jerry J. Fortin Posted September 28, 2009 Report Posted September 28, 2009 Do the Liberals really think Canadians want another election? Are they mad? We didn't want the last election either, but we got it in spite of what we wanted to serve no other purpose than to provide an opportunity for the government to get a majority. This time the other side wants a kick at the cat and it is therefore a bad idea! Quote
madmax Posted September 28, 2009 Report Posted September 28, 2009 As a taxpayer, I demand a larger deficit. Keep voting Harper and your demands will continue to be met. Quote
madmax Posted September 28, 2009 Report Posted September 28, 2009 Do the Liberals really think Canadians want another election? Are they mad? No but, Conservatives thought didn't give a shit that Canadians Didn't want an election last year. That didn't stop them from making a mockery of their own election law, and putting almost half of Canadians to sleep with an unwanted election. The only difference this time, is that the public is ready to hand out retribution to the party that gets accused of causing the election. This will make it difficult for the Liberals to force the issue, the CPC to do another stunt like last year, or even orchestrate a poison pill, and it makes it difficult for the NDP to claim moral superiority and vote down the govenment on principle, if they expect to be around. NDP polling numbers appear high, because they didn't cause the fall of the government. The Liberals know that Canadians don't want an election, but that is no reason for them not to be prepared if there is one. Unlike Dion who got smoked last year. And with time, all parties can get their finances in order and even more importantly, the media cannot afford an election and will publicly skewer the party they feel is to blame. I wouldn't say the Liberals are mad. Possibly disconnected from the voting public, and somewhat self centred on their drive for power. But I would say they are neither mad nor politically incompetent when it comes to reading polls. Infact they are the best at it. Quote
jdobbin Posted September 28, 2009 Report Posted September 28, 2009 If, as expected, the Liberals come out with a strongly-worded non-confidence motion - and the NDP supports the goverment....then I suspect the NDP will actually rise in the polls at the further expense of the Liberals. And if they don't, will that mean that people want the Liberals to act like an Opposition? Quote
jdobbin Posted September 28, 2009 Report Posted September 28, 2009 Do the Liberals really think Canadians want another election? Are they mad? Do you really think Canadians to vote in support of the government at every turn? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.