Bonam Posted September 1, 2009 Report Posted September 1, 2009 (edited) Deleted. Double post. Edited September 1, 2009 by Bonam Quote
g_bambino Posted September 1, 2009 Report Posted September 1, 2009 (edited) Who says 600,000? The Bible claims 603,550 "fighting men", to be exact: Book of Numbers, 1:46. …It seems to me that the events could easily be based in truth. It could have been just a few dozen or a few hundred people fleeing slavery. That would not have left much evidence, nor been worthy of recording in Egyptian records, and yet be prominent in the memory of that small group that fled and afterward settled elsewhere. Indeed; and that was the point I was trying to get across. But that means the Exodus is hardly a tale of the emancipation of the Hebrew people. It could have been a few dozen people; it may not have been the Egyptians they were enslaved by; it's possibly a melding of two or more older tales. Archæologists, historians, and even rabbis doubt the veracity of the story. [c/e] Edited September 1, 2009 by g_bambino Quote
jbg Posted September 1, 2009 Author Report Posted September 1, 2009 I'm no believer of religious texts of any origin, but it seems to me that the events could easily be based in truth. Who says 600,000? That is obviously an exaggeration. It could have been just a few dozen or a few hundred people fleeing slavery. That would not have left much evidence, nor been worthy of recording in Egyptian records, and yet be prominent in the memory of that small group that fled and afterward settled elsewhere.My own guestimate would be a few hundred to maybe a thousand. My guess is that they arrived as nomadic tribesmen, maybe in the range of a few hundred, and were, for whatever reason, given fertile land to live on, in the nature of the story of Goshen. It is in the nature of governments, when groups or regions prosper, to want more, not less from them. This, I believe, did ultimately lead to fear of the group as outsiders, envy, and ultimately enslavement. In other words the Biblical story makes sense.Most ancient works seem to be based in truth, often much to the surprise of modern scholars. Homer's Iliad for example was written off as fiction for the longest time, until the remains of Troy were found not long ago.I tend to agree. The oral histories, when rapidly reduced to writing, in my view are largely true. There may be some exaggeration, along the lines of the "lumberjack" stories, but the substance is true. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
g_bambino Posted September 1, 2009 Report Posted September 1, 2009 In other words the Biblical story makes sense. The oral histories, when rapidly reduced to writing, in my view are largely true. This relies on two things, though: 1) sense equals truth, and 2) the stories were rapidly transferred to written form. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.