maplesyrup Posted April 28, 2004 Report Posted April 28, 2004 PM, Bush deflect missile discussion Too bad politicians can not be above board about what they represent, and what their plans are. No wonder we have such low voter turnout. :angry: Quote An education isn't how much you have committed to memory, or even how much you know. It's being able to differentiate between what you do know and what you don't. Anatole France
maplesyrup Posted July 11, 2004 Author Report Posted July 11, 2004 Martin tells U.S. ambassador decision on missile defence pending Just days after the federal election, Prime Minister Paul Martin informed American officials he would soon decide whether Canada will join the U.S.-led missile defence program. Sources on both sides of the border indicate privately that Canadian participation is seen as a near-certainty, and a government website has already begun extolling the benefits of the missile shield. But an aide to Martin insisted the prime minister was non-committal when he called U.S. Ambassador Paul Cellucci last week and suggested that - with a fall deadline looming - Canada was approaching its decision. "He provided no assurance of any kind, whatsoever, with respect to timing - period," said Martin adviser Scott Reid. "He did not provide assurance it would be soon." The prime minister merely called to discuss a wide range of Canada-U.S. issues following the election, Reid said, and to return a congratulatory phone call days earlier from Cellucci following the Liberal victory. Does anyone really believe a word that is coming out of their mouths for one second? Quote An education isn't how much you have committed to memory, or even how much you know. It's being able to differentiate between what you do know and what you don't. Anatole France
Slavik44 Posted July 12, 2004 Report Posted July 12, 2004 Martin tells U.S. ambassador decision on missile defence pendingJust days after the federal election, Prime Minister Paul Martin informed American officials he would soon decide whether Canada will join the U.S.-led missile defence program. Sources on both sides of the border indicate privately that Canadian participation is seen as a near-certainty, and a government website has already begun extolling the benefits of the missile shield. But an aide to Martin insisted the prime minister was non-committal when he called U.S. Ambassador Paul Cellucci last week and suggested that - with a fall deadline looming - Canada was approaching its decision. "He provided no assurance of any kind, whatsoever, with respect to timing - period," said Martin adviser Scott Reid. "He did not provide assurance it would be soon." The prime minister merely called to discuss a wide range of Canada-U.S. issues following the election, Reid said, and to return a congratulatory phone call days earlier from Cellucci following the Liberal victory. Does anyone really believe a word that is coming out of their mouths for one second? No but it helps them look like they are thinking, atleast we would have had an answer with the conservatives. I personally hope the NDP can get the Liberals to say no to strategic missile defense, but we will have to wait and see on this one, of course a Liberal-conservative yes vote could put it through. Quote The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. - Ayn Rand --------- http://www.politicalcompass.org/ Economic Left/Right: 4.75 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.54 Last taken: May 23, 2007
Dragon Posted July 12, 2004 Report Posted July 12, 2004 Martin tells U.S. ambassador decision on missile defence pendingJust days after the federal election, Prime Minister Paul Martin informed American officials he would soon decide whether Canada will join the U.S.-led missile defence program. Sources on both sides of the border indicate privately that Canadian participation is seen as a near-certainty, and a government website has already begun extolling the benefits of the missile shield. But an aide to Martin insisted the prime minister was non-committal when he called U.S. Ambassador Paul Cellucci last week and suggested that - with a fall deadline looming - Canada was approaching its decision. "He provided no assurance of any kind, whatsoever, with respect to timing - period," said Martin adviser Scott Reid. "He did not provide assurance it would be soon." The prime minister merely called to discuss a wide range of Canada-U.S. issues following the election, Reid said, and to return a congratulatory phone call days earlier from Cellucci following the Liberal victory. Does anyone really believe a word that is coming out of their mouths for one second? No but it helps them look like they are thinking, atleast we would have had an answer with the conservatives. I personally hope the NDP can get the Liberals to say no to strategic missile defense, but we will have to wait and see on this one, of course a Liberal-conservative yes vote could put it through. A Lib-Consv vote would put it through, but since the Libs will be looking to the NDP for support a majority of the time in this government. The last thing Martin should do is piss them off by getting Harper’s help when/if a vote comes up on this issue Quote
maplesyrup Posted July 12, 2004 Author Report Posted July 12, 2004 Precisely. Looks like trouble ahead for Mr Undemocratic Deficit. Quote An education isn't how much you have committed to memory, or even how much you know. It's being able to differentiate between what you do know and what you don't. Anatole France
Hawk Posted July 12, 2004 Report Posted July 12, 2004 Haha I would rather spend our taxpayer dollars on a system designed to protect ourselves from Nuclear destruction than on the Gun Registry (which, surprise surprise, doesn't work when the offender *gasp* DOESN'T register his gun before a robbery) or paying for nice dinners and living quarters for in-mates ( because hey, they may have raped and/or murdered someone but they are people too =*( ) =p Quote The only thing more confusing than a blonde is a Liberal Check this out - http://www.republicofalberta.com/ - http://albertarepublicans.org/ "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." - John F. Kennedy (1917 - 1963)
Slavik44 Posted July 12, 2004 Report Posted July 12, 2004 Haha I would rather spend our taxpayer dollars on a system designed to protect ourselves from Nuclear destruction than on the Gun Registry (which, surprise surprise, doesn't work when the offender *gasp* DOESN'T register his gun before a robbery) or paying for nice dinners and living quarters for in-mates ( because hey, they may have raped and/or murdered someone but they are people too =*( ) =p persoanlly I would have rather not spent money on any of the above. Quote The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. - Ayn Rand --------- http://www.politicalcompass.org/ Economic Left/Right: 4.75 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.54 Last taken: May 23, 2007
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.