Jump to content

Flaherty hints at tax cuts as consumer confidence dips


Recommended Posts

I don't know how a government could survive if it cut its income source off completely.

With no time limit, probably not more than a year. Complete removal of GST would cost $30 billion for the year according to the Globe and Mail. Twelve weeks of removing corporate income tax about the same.

The cost of a complete income tax drop for a year might be prohibitive but coming from no deficit to a one year one, there is little doubt it would act as a stimulus for spending.

After a year, the GST would have to be restored if for no other reason than cool possible inflation.

Forestry and Auto don't require bailouts as much as the industry and forestry require stronger laws to keep profitable operations from being purchased for their technology then relocated offshore. The loans are to help operations move and to help operations move, some of these facilities must maintain operation for a few years.

Which companies have been bought for their technology?

I know some have been bought for equipment which was moved but I haven't seen one for technology except for the Canadarm company which the Tories blocked. And in that case, I wasn't sure if the operation was being moved.

It is to help with a harmonious closure. No matter what the government does with its friends who are lining up for their corporate welfare cheques, none of this money creates markets or a consumer base.

The bailouts make me nervous about the money not having any accountability.

I'd rather use a stimulus more broadly so I don't have a problem reducing taxes but other spending has to be cut and there has to be a time limit on some tax cuts if it causes a structural deficit.

I have no problems cracking down on companies using the money to line their pockets or fund building operations that ultimately don't benefit the taxpayer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Consumption taxes need not adversely impact the poor! Even the GST needs a remake, there should be more things tax exempt. Childrens clothing, baby food, diapers, personal toiletries and non prepared foods all of these things need to be tax free. This is what the poor spend money on, basic necessities so make them tax exempt. Tax everything else, short of utility payments for private dwellings.

The government would collect taxes based upon consumption, the taxes would be applied equally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like this comment, because it reflects what I hear when speaking to government officials and MPs and MPPs.

Am I too list 10s, hundreds or a thousand companies? Where would you like me to start?

I can only go by what I've read. I don't doubt that is happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,723
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    DACHSHUND
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Ronaldo_ earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • babetteteets went up a rank
      Rookie
    • paradox34 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...