LesterDC Posted January 2, 2009 Report Posted January 2, 2009 QUOTE(LesterDC @ Jan 2 2009, 01:35 PM) * Still don't see it. QUOTE(LesterDC @ Jan 2 2009, 01:08 PM) * You might as well emigrate down to America, you don't seem to agree with most Canadian beliefs.. They are a republic down there, they hate immigrants, homosexuals and abortions... they also have mega-churches with dogmatic "Christians". Sounds like a dream come true doesn't it? Fine, I'll stop pulling your tail.. What makes you think that immigration is just a skin colour thing? Immigrants bring different cultures to America don't they? Quote
Mr.Canada Posted January 2, 2009 Author Report Posted January 2, 2009 QUOTE(LesterDC @ Jan 2 2009, 01:35 PM) *Still don't see it. QUOTE(LesterDC @ Jan 2 2009, 01:08 PM) * You might as well emigrate down to America, you don't seem to agree with most Canadian beliefs.. They are a republic down there, they hate immigrants, homosexuals and abortions... they also have mega-churches with dogmatic "Christians". Sounds like a dream come true doesn't it? Fine, I'll stop pulling your tail.. What makes you think that immigration is just a skin colour thing? Immigrants bring different cultures to America don't they? I know what you were getting at. When we talk about immigrants we're largely speaking of people of colour since that's by far what we get. Quote "You are scum for insinuating that isn't the case you snake." -William Ashley Canadian Immigration Reform Blog
Smallc Posted January 2, 2009 Report Posted January 2, 2009 (edited) When we talk about immigrants we're largely speaking of people of colour since that's by far what we get. That's funny, because when I talk about immigrants, I talk about people who are moving to Canada. Then again, I also base almost none of my opinions on skin colour, gender, etc. It seems that you do view skin colour as an important difference though. Edited January 2, 2009 by Smallc Quote
LesterDC Posted January 2, 2009 Report Posted January 2, 2009 (edited) I know what you were getting at. When we talk about immigrants we're largely speaking of people of colour since that's by far what we get. Well, that isn't what I was talking about. People aren't afraid of someone because he is black or slightly more beige than themselves.. They may be afraid of browner skinned citizens because they may be radical Islamic terrorists or something.. Therefore, they are really afraid of different cultures, not skin colours.. Still ignorant, but people are stupid sometimes.. Edited January 2, 2009 by LesterDC Quote
M.Dancer Posted January 2, 2009 Report Posted January 2, 2009 Really, All of France former colonies are now also a members of the European Union.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martinique Particular martinique. Logic dictates Canada should have along with Britain been made a members as well. What about Indo China and Algeria? Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
whowhere Posted January 2, 2009 Report Posted January 2, 2009 Those ARE French colonies.. not FORMER. That means that they are still acting under the authority of the French. I didn't know that Madagascar was part of the European Union.. The Fact is those colonies have access to all that the EU has to offer and vice versus. France and Britain have both subordinated themselves and are now Governed by the EU. As with Frances's colonies so should have happened with Britains. The EU is still new. Only 9 years really. This action has been lost in the shuffle. Give it time. Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the British Isles all to be brought in. This can be accomplished one of two ways. The queen proclaim it so or the UK's parliament repeals the legislation that has given Canada, Australia, etc their autonomy and they are back under the legislative Control of the UK and like France's Colonies Canada is established as part of the European Union Via the UK. Quote Job 40 (King James Version) 11 Cast abroad the rage of thy wrath: and behold every one that is proud, and abase him. 12 Look on every one that is proud, and bring him low; and tread down the wicked in their place. 13 Hide them in the dust together; and bind their faces in secret.
whowhere Posted January 2, 2009 Report Posted January 2, 2009 What about Indo China and Algeria? What about Hong Kong and South Africa? To Chinese or African perhaps? These regions were more like occupation perhaps? Quote Job 40 (King James Version) 11 Cast abroad the rage of thy wrath: and behold every one that is proud, and abase him. 12 Look on every one that is proud, and bring him low; and tread down the wicked in their place. 13 Hide them in the dust together; and bind their faces in secret.
M.Dancer Posted January 2, 2009 Report Posted January 2, 2009 What about Hong Kong and South Africa? To Chinese or African perhaps? These regions were more like occupation perhaps? You forgoten already what you wrere babbling about? When did Algeria join the EU? Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
whowhere Posted January 2, 2009 Report Posted January 2, 2009 You forgoten already what you wrere babbling about? When did Algeria join the EU? When did Hong Kong, South Africa, India cease to be British Colonies. Probably about the same time Haiti and Algeria. Quote Job 40 (King James Version) 11 Cast abroad the rage of thy wrath: and behold every one that is proud, and abase him. 12 Look on every one that is proud, and bring him low; and tread down the wicked in their place. 13 Hide them in the dust together; and bind their faces in secret.
M.Dancer Posted January 2, 2009 Report Posted January 2, 2009 When did Hong Kong, South Africa, India cease to be British Colonies. Probably about the same time Haiti and Algeria. Hong Kong? 1999 South Africa? 1910 India? 1947.... Try again Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
LesterDC Posted January 2, 2009 Report Posted January 2, 2009 The Fact is those colonies have access to all that the EU has to offer and vice versus. France and Britain have both subordinated themselves and are now Governed by the EU. As with Frances's colonies so should have happened with Britains. The EU is still new. Only 9 years really. This action has been lost in the shuffle. Give it time. Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the British Isles all to be brought in.This can be accomplished one of two ways. The queen proclaim it so or the UK's parliament repeals the legislation that has given Canada, Australia, etc their autonomy and they are back under the legislative Control of the UK and like France's Colonies Canada is established as part of the European Union Via the UK. It's very simple.. French Guyana is a French COLONY. It is administrated by the French and so whatever the French people do, French Guyana will do. Therefore, if France is in the EU, so is the French Guyana. On the other hand, Madagascar was a former French colony - now it is independent. Since it is independent from France, it does not dwell in same privileges as the French people do. Canada is a FORMER colony and it is now independent, why would we join the EU? Are you saying that we are still dominions of the British? Quote
ToadBrother Posted January 3, 2009 Report Posted January 3, 2009 The Fact is those colonies have access to all that the EU has to offer and vice versus. France and Britain have both subordinated themselves and are now Governed by the EU. As with Frances's colonies so should have happened with Britains. The EU is still new. Only 9 years really. This action has been lost in the shuffle. Give it time. Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the British Isles all to be brought in.This can be accomplished one of two ways. The queen proclaim it so or the UK's parliament repeals the legislation that has given Canada, Australia, etc their autonomy and they are back under the legislative Control of the UK and like France's Colonies Canada is established as part of the European Union Via the UK. I have no idea what fantasy land you're living in, but none of the former Dominions and colonies, save for those that remain very explicitly British colonies give the Queen that power. She can't do anything unilaterally, not in Britain, and not in any of Her Parliaments anywhere else in Her realms. You need to pick up a history book and read up on the Glorious Revolution. Parlaiment is supreme. Quote
whowhere Posted January 3, 2009 Report Posted January 3, 2009 It's very simple.. French Guyana is a French COLONY. It is administrated by the French and so whatever the French people do, French Guyana will do. Therefore, if France is in the EU, so is the French Guyana. On the other hand, Madagascar was a former French colony - now it is independent. Since it is independent from France, it does not dwell in same privileges as the French people do. Canada is a FORMER colony and it is now independent, why would we join the EU? Are you saying that we are still dominions of the British? Canada should have thought of that before using the queen to force a constitution on the people in 1982 without a vote by the people. Incidently, the queen is still the sovereign of Canada. Not only was an undemocratic constitution imposed on Canada, the bureacrats and politicians along with Queen's representive have used this document to destroy the fabric of Canada. Canada is no longer Canada. The fact is the Canadian people have never had a say in Canada, why should the Canadian people have a say now. The queen can via a proclamation force Canada into the EU Or the British parliament can revoke the legislation making Canada independent Country. Either/Or the result will be the same. Quote Job 40 (King James Version) 11 Cast abroad the rage of thy wrath: and behold every one that is proud, and abase him. 12 Look on every one that is proud, and bring him low; and tread down the wicked in their place. 13 Hide them in the dust together; and bind their faces in secret.
LesterDC Posted January 3, 2009 Report Posted January 3, 2009 (edited) Canada should have thought of that before using the queen to force a constitution on the people in 1982 without a vote by the people. Incidently, the queen is still the sovereign of Canada. Not only was an undemocratic constitution imposed on Canada, the bureacrats and politicians along with Queen's representive have used this document to destroy the fabric of Canada. Canada is no longer Canada. The fact is the Canadian people have never had a say in Canada, why should the Canadian people have a say now. The queen can via a proclamation force Canada into the EU Or the British parliament can revoke the legislation making Canada independent Country. Either/Or the result will be the same. Try wiki-ing "Queen of Canada" Edited January 3, 2009 by LesterDC Quote
whowhere Posted January 3, 2009 Report Posted January 3, 2009 I have no idea what fantasy land you're living in, but none of the former Dominions and colonies, save for those that remain very explicitly British colonies give the Queen that power. She can't do anything unilaterally, not in Britain, and not in any of Her Parliaments anywhere else in Her realms. You need to pick up a history book and read up on the Glorious Revolution. Parlaiment is supreme. Oh the 1982 Constitution imposed on Canada by the Queen, the liberal party, and the supreme court was fantasy. Smoke some crack buddy. Quote Job 40 (King James Version) 11 Cast abroad the rage of thy wrath: and behold every one that is proud, and abase him. 12 Look on every one that is proud, and bring him low; and tread down the wicked in their place. 13 Hide them in the dust together; and bind their faces in secret.
whowhere Posted January 3, 2009 Report Posted January 3, 2009 Please, learn a thing or two about our government.. 1982 Constitution no democratic vote but imposed on Canada by the Queen. nuff said. Quote Job 40 (King James Version) 11 Cast abroad the rage of thy wrath: and behold every one that is proud, and abase him. 12 Look on every one that is proud, and bring him low; and tread down the wicked in their place. 13 Hide them in the dust together; and bind their faces in secret.
Smallc Posted January 3, 2009 Report Posted January 3, 2009 1982 Constitution no democratic vote but imposed on Canada by the Queen. nuff said. Didn't the democratically elected parliament pass the constitution act, 1982? Quote
LesterDC Posted January 3, 2009 Report Posted January 3, 2009 (edited) edit Edited January 3, 2009 by LesterDC Quote
LesterDC Posted January 3, 2009 Report Posted January 3, 2009 1982 Constitution no democratic vote but imposed on Canada by the Queen. nuff said. Didn't the democratically elected parliament pass the constitution act, 1982? Yeah, she only had to sign it Quote
whowhere Posted January 3, 2009 Report Posted January 3, 2009 Didn't the democratically elected parliament pass the constitution act, 1982? Did the people of each and every state in the newly created united states vote on the constitution???????????? YEP. I guess a document as important as the constitution of the United States required a vote by all the people in the United States at the time. How does Canada's 1982 Constitution compare with how the United States Constitution voting process. How does Canada's 1982 Constitution compare with how the EU constitution was voted on which also required a vote by the people. Yeah people voted, in Canada no people voted. Yeah, real democracy at work. However, what you establish was that Queen holds power over Canada to impose and change Canada's Constitution. Given Canada's corruption and direction this is going to be inevitable. Quote Job 40 (King James Version) 11 Cast abroad the rage of thy wrath: and behold every one that is proud, and abase him. 12 Look on every one that is proud, and bring him low; and tread down the wicked in their place. 13 Hide them in the dust together; and bind their faces in secret.
Smallc Posted January 3, 2009 Report Posted January 3, 2009 The Constitution Act, 1982, is not the Constitution. it was an addition to the Constitution. Quote
fellowtraveller Posted January 3, 2009 Report Posted January 3, 2009 If former French colonies are all EU members, that means Canada is in ! Yippee, now I can finally get that Citroen...... Quote The government should do something.
Mr.Canada Posted January 3, 2009 Author Report Posted January 3, 2009 If former French colonies are all EU members, that means Canada is in !Yippee, now I can finally get that Citroen...... Citroen's all around, yeaaahhhh! Gimme my double chevron car hehehe... Quote "You are scum for insinuating that isn't the case you snake." -William Ashley Canadian Immigration Reform Blog
Jerry J. Fortin Posted January 3, 2009 Report Posted January 3, 2009 You choose Protestantism over the true Church? Once you know the true faith(Catholicism) and turn away from it you cannot be saved and enter heaven. I pray for your return to the true Church. Keep praying, why don't you hold your breath while you are at it. The true church? What arrogance! Have your pervert priests join the sex offender lists first, then I will consider returning. You're seriously mistaken here JJ. Protestantism bases itself in Sola Scriptura, this is flawed thinking.Wow, I cannot even respond to this. Full of errors and inaccuracies. You need to stop listening to your pastor and talk to a priest. Utter drivel. You are a pompous and delusional fool. Your arrogance is exceeded only by your ignorance. Quote
Mr.Canada Posted January 3, 2009 Author Report Posted January 3, 2009 Keep praying, why don't you hold your breath while you are at it. The true church? What arrogance! Have your pervert priests join the sex offender lists first, then I will consider returning.Utter drivel. You are a pompous and delusional fool. Your arrogance is exceeded only by your ignorance. The Catholic Church is the one true Church started by St. Peter as instructed by Jesus Christ. Do you deny this? Are you contending that Protestantism isn't based on Sola Scriptura? Quote "You are scum for insinuating that isn't the case you snake." -William Ashley Canadian Immigration Reform Blog
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.