Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 356
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
jdobbin, is every single thing that Harper or the Tories do wrong?

You seem to attack them no matter what they do.

Is it that this is a political forum and everyone is supposed to be hyper-partisan?

Just curious.

Thats rather amusing, coming from you....

:)

Posted
And was kicked out of caucus the problem with your post was that you didn't mention that making the post look hyper-partisan.
she was kicked out of the party when she accepted the appointment

:huh:

Posted (edited)

6 minutes before the last quote:

Someone should have let Lillian Dyck know that when she was appointed in 2005. The party refuse to allow her to be a member of their caucus after her appointment; however, as an NDP politician, she still accepted a senate seat.

:blink:

Edited by cybercoma
Posted
That's not what I said. The poster I was replying to said the NDP doesn't accept senate seats. I showed that an NDP member in 2005 accepted a senate seat, that's all.

And its difficult to tell what that meant. There is no NDP member in the Senate. And therefore, while you may or may not be technically correct on the appointment, however it is clear that the NDP will have nothing to do with those who accept a Senate seat. Which does undermine the comment prior to your point of fact.

:)

Posted
And its difficult to tell what that meant. There is no NDP member in the Senate. And therefore, while you may or may not be technically correct on the appointment, however it is clear that the NDP will have nothing to do with those who accept a Senate seat. Which does undermine the comment prior to your point of fact.

You said the "NDP will not accept senate seats". Lillian Dyck was NDP and accepted a senate seat. Although she was theoretically kicked out of the party, she sits in the senate as an "Independent New Democratic Party" member. It's clear where her priorities are.

Posted
You said the "NDP will not accept senate seats". Lillian Dyck was NDP and accepted a senate seat.

She may have been from the NDP, but she's not The NDP.

Posted
You said the "NDP will not accept senate seats". Lillian Dyck was NDP and accepted a senate seat. Although she was theoretically kicked out of the party, she sits in the senate as an "Independent New Democratic Party" member. It's clear where her priorities are.

Once and NDP member always a NDP member right?

Posted
And its difficult to tell what that meant. There is no NDP member in the Senate. And therefore, while you may or may not be technically correct on the appointment, however it is clear that the NDP will have nothing to do with those who accept a Senate seat. Which does undermine the comment prior to your point of fact.

The NDP are a protest party, nothing more. They haven't earned any right to a senate seat as far as I can see.

Elizabeth May(GP) who is an American, sitting on our Senate? No thank you.

"You are scum for insinuating that isn't the case you snake." -William Ashley

Canadian Immigration Reform Blog

Posted
She may have been from the NDP, but she's not The NDP.

You're really splitting hairs. The entire party does not get appointed to the Senate, politicians are appointed. By saying the NDP doesn't accept senate positions, it is implied that you mean "members of the NDP do not accept senate positions". That's not necessarily the case because this member of the NDP did accept a seat. Sure, she was kicked out of the party, but she still identifies herself as an Independent New Democrat.

Once and NDP member always a NDP member right?

That's not what I said either.

Posted
The NDP are a protest party, nothing more. They haven't earned any right to a senate seat as far as I can see.

Elizabeth May(GP) who is an American, sitting on our Senate? No thank you.

Considering they represent 20% of Canada I think they have a little bit of a right.

Posted (edited)
Considering they represent 20% of Canada I think they have a little bit of a right.

Actually, 17.48% of votes casted, not 20% of Canadians. Not anywhere close.

Edited by cybercoma
Posted
You're really splitting hairs. The entire party does not get appointed to the Senate, politicians are appointed. By saying the NDP doesn't accept senate positions, it is implied that you mean "members of the NDP do not accept senate positions".

No we imply unlike the Cons when we talk about the Senate we don't just do it to get elected we believe in what we say. The party acts on their redirect and is willing to give up things like this to stand their ground. Unlike Harper apparently.

Posted
No we imply unlike the Cons when we talk about the Senate we don't just do it to get elected we believe in what we say. The party acts on their redirect and is willing to give up things like this to stand their ground. Unlike Harper apparently.

red-herring.

Posted
Elizabeth May certainly is an American.

Yah because living in Canada for the last 34 does not qualify her to voice her opinion. Infact you must live in Canada for 35 years to get the right to vote or be in the Senate. Wait one second that is not true at all. In fact their are many people who were born in Canada who have lived her less time then her.

Posted
The NDP ............ They haven't earned any right to a senate seat as far as I can see.

Gosh, thats terrible. And since many of the Senators of christmas past are from an Era when the CCF existed, there have never been any of them in the Senate either. And that's a good thing. The Senate is a place were exiting Prime Ministers put the failed helpers into cushy jobs. And to keep things quiet, they offer a couple bones to the other parties failed helpers. Nothing like being sent out to pasture...

Elizabeth May(GP) who is an American, sitting on our Senate? No thank you.

I heard Stephens thinking about it..... :P

:)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...