Black Dog Posted March 10, 2004 Report Posted March 10, 2004 Picking up the discussion from here where the aptly-monikered Alliance Fanatic hurled this accusation: Well your friend Svend did want to lower the age of consent for boys to 14, which would give members of NAMBLA, and other predators, a legal right to have sexual intercourse with 14 year olds. Which I find completely disgusting, as for the comment of me being a troll, well I want to protect children from predators which is very extremist of me. I also find it sick that people think that pedophilia is alright, so I'm sure that you find pedophilia alright from your comments. Of course, his own sources prove him wrong: Lowering the age of consent for homosexuals to 14 years of age fulfils the dreams of homosexual NDP MP, Svend Robinson (Burnaby--Douglas), who has laboured long and hard for just this amendment, which would have the practical effect of allowing a 40-year-old man, for example, to have legal access to a 14-year-old youth for sexual purposes. (emphasis mine)So the fact is that it's okay under the law for a 40 year old to have sex with a 14 year old of the opposite sex. But the law made an exception for homosexual affairs; this exception was shown to be discriminatory. Whether you agree with the age of consent as it stands or not is irrelevant: there's no need to have two different sets of rules for straights and gays. Quote
Pellaken Posted March 10, 2004 Report Posted March 10, 2004 So the fact is that it's okay under the law for a 40 year old to have sex with a 14 year old of the opposite sex. that is, indeed, true. I went to see a lawyer specifically about this as a politician I dont want to do anything that's going to come back and bite me in the arse. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.