Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
I have to agree with M.Dancer on this one. The Libs had a lot of time in power to do things like this and they didn't. They refused labels that would identify GMO's, they allowed (as does this gov't) round-up ready crops (do I want to eat round up or gmo's unknowingly?). Today was a good step (if it actually goes through as you have noted) but really it is only a first step in keeping citizenry apprised of what they are consuming.

What is the big deal with GMO's, their only modification is that they produce more product, better product, and can be grown more efficiently.

Having a crop roundup ready means it gets sprayed with less chemicals than non-roundup ready crops.

Then there is those kids in Asia where they genetically modified rice to include nutrients so that people won't go blind over there.

If GMO's were as bad as people say they are and do all these horrible things, why would a company risk tanking their share price and going pretty much bankrupt? It is in the company's best interest to keep to not poison their customers which would in turn ruin their company.

This anti-GMO greenpeace malarkey is proposterous, and those kids who aren't blind in South Asia right now are proof of it.

"Stop the Madness!!!" - Kevin O'Leary

"Money is the ultimate scorecard of life!". - Kevin O'Leary

Economic Left/Right: 4.00

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.77

Posted
What is the big deal with GMO's, their only modification is that they produce more product, better product, and can be grown more efficiently.

Having a crop roundup ready means it gets sprayed with less chemicals than non-roundup ready crops.

Then there is those kids in Asia where they genetically modified rice to include nutrients so that people won't go blind over there.

If GMO's were as bad as people say they are and do all these horrible things, why would a company risk tanking their share price and going pretty much bankrupt? It is in the company's best interest to keep to not poison their customers which would in turn ruin their company.

This anti-GMO greenpeace malarkey is proposterous, and those kids who aren't blind in South Asia right now are proof of it.

I don't have a problem with GMP foods existing. What I don't understand is why the food industry is so opposed to disclosure.

I just want to know what is in my food: good, bad, or indifferent. I do not believe that any mfr should be allowed to produce any food product and not be fully transparent with regards to what it is that I'm eating.

Posted
What was the issue with Highliner fish? That is not fished in Canada, or that it is not safe?

Most Canadians in our area believed they were supporting the fisherman of the Maritimes by buying a very trusted produce. It was a slap in the face to most of us to find very little or none of the fish produced by Highliner and saying it was Canadian was actually that.

Posted
I don't have a problem with GMP foods existing. What I don't understand is why the food industry is so opposed to disclosure.

I just want to know what is in my food: good, bad, or indifferent. I do not believe that any mfr should be allowed to produce any food product and not be fully transparent with regards to what it is that I'm eating.

Exactly, why are the so afraid to have it on the labels. That very fact makes them suspicious.

Posted
EXACTLY, no place to sell your produce,so where does it go, under factories, well we know that really works, under houses, who can afford them when the factories all close.

I don't understand your post, what do you mean the produce goes under factories and under houses, and exactly why would a government want this to happen - it sure makes no sense.

Here's something from highliner, they say that the fish on W-5 SEGMENT is not one of their products.

http://www.highliner.com/site/eng/art0044.asp

Our favourite fish is tilapia, grouper and seabass, can't get that from Canada...

Hey Ho - Ontario Liberals Have to Go - Fight Wynne - save our province

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,898
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Flora smith
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...