why Alberta hasn't seperated

[no queenslave]

If you understand that the second oldest son of wealthy families in Britain sent their sons to live in canada and paid them to stay their while passing on thse family buisiness to the eldest son. most settled in Alberta. A lot of old ties to the British.

[geoffrey]

You've really got to learn to add some credibility to your posts, like a link or something? Honestly, I don't believe you. And it's relevance to Alberta? None.

[no queenslave]

You've really got to learn to add some credibility to your posts, like a link or something? Honestly, I don't believe you. And it's relevance to Alberta? None.

you are missing more than one link, and your comments have no credibility. You should learn to read something other than your government propaganda. What link have you to support that no sons of wealthy were sent to live in Canada?

[jefferiah]

you are missing more than one link, and your comments have no credibility. You should learn to read something other than your government propaganda. What link have you to support that no sons of wealthy were sent to live in Canada?

lolol

[ScottSA]

If you understand that the second oldest son of wealthy families in Britain sent their sons to live in canada and paid them to stay their while passing on thse family buisiness to the eldest son. most settled in Alberta. A lot of old ties to the British.

That's nonsense. As a rule, the second son went into the military as an officer, and the third son became a minister. The fourth son, assuming one was got up, generally became a ne'er-do-well or writer or painter or some fluff on a stipend. As a rule. The only way second sons generally got here was through a queen's regiment.

I suggest you stop reading truther and freeman sites and go back to school to actually learn something.

[no queenslave]

That's nonsense. As a rule, the second son went into the military as an officer, and the third son became a minister. The fourth son, assuming one was got up, generally became a ne'er-do-well or writer or painter or some fluff on a stipend. As a rule. The only way second sons generally got here was through a queen's regiment.

I suggest you stop reading truther and freeman sites and go back to school to actually learn something.

just facts you have no knowledge of because of your government indoctrination., instead of an education. the nonsense is the idea canada is a democracy. What was the makeup of the population of alberta in the early 1900? Only british ladys in alberta no british men? maybe mostly french ?I have never read or heard of the sites you are so learned on. You apearently only rely on propaganda text ; instead of documented hansard.

[ScottSA]

just facts you have no knowledge of because of your government indoctrination., instead of an education. the nonsense is the idea canada is a democracy. What was the makeup of the population of alberta in the early 1900? Only british ladys in alberta no british men? maybe mostly french ?I have never read or heard of the sites you are so learned on. You apearently only rely on propaganda text ; instead of documented hansard.

You just don't have a clue. You can't even spell. My "government indoctrination" took place in New Delhi India and Mexico City DF, so I can swear real good in Hindi and Espanol, but I'm not about to don a sombrero, jump in a second hand sherman tank and trundle off toward the Pakistani border, if that's what you're thinking. It's not "government indoctrination" that taught me who did what and where in the British empire, it's something called European History 101, although I assume grade 12 in canada has some mention of it as well. No doubt the queen and her black rood have taken possession of the professor's minds and they lie shamelessly about what happened, but still, at least they make a modicum of sense, which is far more than I can say for you. If my ignorance has to stand beside your all revealing knowledge of the queen puppetmaster, I daresay ignorance is blissful indeed. Go back to school young man. The west is already won.

Btw, did the voices tell you that Alberta was populated by wealthy british sons?

Edited October 23, 2007 by ScottSA

[no queenslave]

You just don't have a clue. You can't even spell. My "government indoctrination" took place in New Delhi India and Mexico City DF, so I can swear real good in Hindi and Espanol, but I'm not about to don a sombrero, jump in a second hand sherman tank and trundle off toward the Pakistani border, if that's what you're thinking. It's not "government indoctrination" that taught me who did what and where in the British empire, it's something called European History 101, although I assume grade 12 in canada has some mention of it as well. No doubt the queen and her black rood have taken possession of the professor's minds and they lie shamelessly about what happened, but still, at least they make a modicum of sense, which is far more than I can say for you. If my ignorance has to stand beside your all revealing knowledge of the queen puppetmaster, I daresay ignorance is blissful indeed. Go back to school young man. The west is already won.

Btw, did the voices tell you that Alberta was populated by wealthy british sons?

do some research on remittance men. You have been indoctrinated in government propaganda and have no clue as to Canada and it's political situation.European history - when was Canada part of 101 Europe? You have been given the shaft of the black rod.Your insist of having to go to school is a demonstration of your indoctrination that you only believe government propaganda. Education is what you learn after you learn how to tell the difference between government indoctrination and facts.www.historycooperative.org/journals/ohq/108.1/grady.html

remittance men and the character of cannon beach

Edited October 23, 2007 by no queenslave

[Guest coot]

Alberta hasn't separated because Albertans largely consider themselves Canadian.

[no queenslave]

Alberta hasn't separated because Albertans largely consider themselves Canadian.

Alberta hasn't separated largely because of their British heritage and ingrained reliance of getting aid from home. You and traditions die hard. It is not that they consider themselves Canadians but monarchist. when were Albertans told that the statute of westminster gave them their sovereignty and independence and given the choice to separate and change the powers of the federal government? provide Alberta government hansard showing where the people were given a choice ; such as if they wanted a triple e senate or any other changes. Just another demonstration of the people in power wanting no change so they never gave the people a choice to how they wanted to be governed. Canadians are still controlled by the old colonial power families and their privileged hangers on. If you won a contest and the people running the contest refused to inform you of your winning what have you won?

[Hydraboss]

Alberta hasn't separated largely because of their British heritage and ingrained reliance of getting aid from home. You and traditions die hard. It is not that they consider themselves Canadians but monarchist. when were Albertans told that the statute of westminster gave them their sovereignty and independence and given the choice to separate and change the powers of the federal government? provide Alberta government hansard showing where the people were given a choice ; such as if they wanted a triple e senate or any other changes. Just another demonstration of the people in power wanting no change so they never gave the people a choice to how they wanted to be governed. Canadians are still controlled by the old colonial power families and their privileged hangers on. If you won a contest and the people running the contest refused to inform you of your winning what have you won?

So, do you roll your own or buy it pre-rolled?

What is your hang-up with the Monarchy and Alberta? The grand total of the Queen's influence in Alberta is the renaming of Highway #2 to Queen Elizabeth II (QEII). As for why we haven't seperated (yet), that is another story.

[Topaz]

Someone, refresh everyone's memory, why did the Reform/alliance party, I think Deb Grey, talked about Alberta going on their own.? I don't think any province or territory could go on their own, there's too much to lose.

[no queenslave]

So, do you roll your own or buy it pre-rolled?

What is your hang-up with the Monarchy and Alberta? The grand total of the Queen's influence in Alberta is the renaming of Highway #2 to Queen Elizabeth II (QEII). As for why we haven't seperated (yet), that is another story.

just another demonstration as to how much the queen has influenced the Alberta government ; in order to change the name of a highway. If she had no influence as you say;then why not name the highway to, dollar road or sadam way?It is you who have no influence; and could not get the name changed to hydraboss. You have the hang-up with perpetuating the corrupt Monarchy, with her corrupt system of government.

Edited October 23, 2007 by no queenslave

[Canadian Blue]

Wackjobs galore.

[Hydraboss]

Someone, refresh everyone's memory, why did the Reform/alliance party, I think Deb Grey, talked about Alberta going on their own.? I don't think any province or territory could go on their own, there's too much to lose.

There is far too much for the ROC to lose, not Alberta. We could do just fine without the hanger's-on coming along for the free ride. But that is another thread now, isn't it?

[Hydraboss]

just another demonstration as to how much the queen has influenced the Alberta government ; in order to change the name of a highway. If she had no influence as you say;then why not name the highway to, dollar road or sadam way?It is you who have no influence; and could not get the name changed to hydraboss. You have the hang-up with perpetuating the corrupt Monarchy, with her corrupt system of government.

Un-huh. Would you like some Kool-Aid? It's cherry!

[no queenslave]

Someone, refresh everyone's memory, why did the Reform/alliance party, I think Deb Grey, talked about Alberta going on their own.? I don't think any province or territory could go on their own, there's too much to lose.

The only loss would be to Ottawas political control over the provinces.What too much to lose???

The loss would be Ottawas ; they just have to separate and force a new deal as to what is just for the provinces instead of just bowing to federal control with no input from the people. It would not be the provinces separating but the provinces finally demonstrating their ability to understand their given sovereignty and freedom by the statute of westminster to form any form of political union they wanted.The colonial rules , by old colonial rulers are not in the best interest of Albertans.No more equalization payments from Alberta to ottawa would be too much to loose for Alberta; must be one loss you think is to great.

Give us the dollar lose to Alberta , or is it not a loss at all, but a windfall for the Alberta people not having to pay federal income taxes, and equalization payments. No federal gst must be another loss Albertans are not willing to give up.

[no queenslave]

Un-huh. Would you like some Kool-Aid? It's cherry!

just another demonstration of what you consider what your priorities are and how much you are willing to pay as a bribe to get something you want ; or to bribe other not to get what they want.

[M.Dancer]

So, do you roll your own or buy it pre-rolled?

Tinfoil to my knowledge comes pre-rolled. If you know where I can get it falt, I'm always open to reducing the costs of hats ........

[AngusThermopyle]

just another demonstration of what you consider what your priorities are and how much you are willing to pay as a bribe to get something you want ; or to bribe other not to get what they want.

Come on guys, show a little respect for a concise, clear argument couched in precise and accurate wording.

Now, seriously.

I don't understand why you think you can make a compelling argument by posting such nonesense. It's easy to accuse everyone of being brainwashed, way harder to prove it though. I submit the theory that it is actually you who has been brainwashed and as such you feel compelled to utter such baseless statements.

[no queenslave]

Tinfoil to my knowledge comes pre-rolled. If you know where I can get it falt, I'm always open to reducing the costs of hats ........

Posted like government paid posters who can't answer the questions put to them. Post some garbage that has nothing to do with the topic .

[no queenslave]

Come on guys, show a little respect for a concise, clear argument couched in precise and accurate wording.

Now, seriously.

I don't understand why you think you can make a compelling argument by posting such nonesense. It's easy to accuse everyone of being brainwashed, way harder to prove it though. I submit the theory that it is actually you who has been brainwashed and as such you feel compelled to utter such baseless statements.

The compelling argument is that you can NOT post any documented record such as provincial hansard as to how each province government debated and informed the people of their right of sovereignty and independence; as granted to the people and provinces by the statute of westminister. You are the one posting nonsense, like a government paid posters. prove me wrong and post the hansard records, or your failure will be an admission you have been indoctrinated, and that is no baseless statement..In your education what is your understanding of the purpose of the statute of westminster and did the people of Canada get what it was supposed to do, and when?

[Topaz]

There is far too much for the ROC to lose, not Alberta. We could do just fine without the hanger's-on coming along for the free ride. But that is another thread now, isn't it?

It maybe another thread but I was wondering if that is the direction Harper is trying to take this country when he said something about provinces being able to optout of transfer payments or maybe some of the other payments and go their own way. If I have this wrong I'm sure someone will correct me.

[M.Dancer]

You are the one posting nonsense, like a government paid posters. prove me wrong and post the hansard records, or your failure will be an admission you have been indoctrinated, and that is no baseless statement..

Post an official pronouncement from the College of Physicians concerning your alledged sanity. Failure to do so wil prove that you are koo koo for coco puffs

[no queenslave]

Come on guys, show a little respect for a concise, clear argument couched in precise and accurate wording.

Now, seriously.

I don't understand why you think you can make a compelling argument by posting such nonesense. It's easy to accuse everyone of being brainwashed, way harder to prove it though. I submit the theory that it is actually you who has been brainwashed and as such you feel compelled to utter such baseless statements.

that is because you have been indoctrinated instead of educated, and until .you realize the difference you will never understand.