paranoid joe

american ranchers dont care about the health of their cattle (as long as they can still sell them) and they dont care about what happens to whoever eats their produce. i say that the whole system should be reformed.

yes this should happen, though it wont...

whatever anyone else might say that IS the reason. the average voter, is looking for the candidate that 'connects' with them. once they find one, they will start and continue voting in that party until there is someone in the other party who 'connects' like it or not that is how mass politics works, if there isnt a new 'connecter' in an entire generation, the parents will teach their 'politics' to their children. my parents were conservative, i am conservative. it all connects.

as you do i see no connections between 9-11 and saddam. i also believe that the us did not act rationally in its invasion of iraq. but as for the invasion of iran? no. iran is a major country, with a large military and over 60 million people. such an invasion would have to be extremly well thought out, and it would need support of the un and america's 'allies'. otherwise, it would practically ruin both americas economy and army as new recruits are harder to come by with all the fighting. and i suppose you approve of the deaths of american civilians as much as you think g. b. approves of the deaths of iraqi civilians, as for me i disapprove of all unneccesary violence. i think that few of the united states problems were solved by either wars; the worldwide 'distaste' for americans is simply strong.

all of its 'colonies' were aquired from wars that were started by Israel arabic neighbors. they were either given back, are going to be given back, or will be forced into the hands of the palestinians as they wont take it unless it comes with the rest of israel. i agree, it is partially true, though most of them left when israel was created well of course, before the zionists came it was a wasteland, with prehaps 100000 bedouins, the population boomed with their effort. now the zionist seek only to control what is rightfully theirs, i.e. what was given to them in 1948 by the un. hmm i cant say it was. 1. palestine is jordan and israel, get the facts straight. 2.actually if the palestinians dont LET them share it after the wall is built (wink wink) they will be forcefully granted their 'wish'. actually w/out the holocaust there probably wouldnt be a state of israel. but other than that the only way they have done that is make excessive numbers of charities out of it . yes it was true but whenever a large amount of people move to a new area, they often forcibly remove whoever happens to be there. i vote they just settle down in the west bank or one of the other countries in the area. yes it is but it cant be stopped until there is some peace and negotiations. define 'human rights violator'

yeah it seems that they should have chosen a healthier cardinal (personally i was hopeing for a latin american pope), as it is often traumatic to lots of people to see the pope die.

Im with Kimmy too. Its one thing to disagree with someone (with GWB I encourge it as i dont really like the guy), but it is absurd to say that he has a mental illness. (imagine if this was being said the other way around)

I dont really think that propaganda made for the purpose to discourge pot is really that bad, even if you don't become homeless, it still is a health issue, and it is illegal. yes i agree that it is brainwashing (it has throughly convinced me) but is this really bad??

I agree, if you dont have citizenship than you shouldnt be able to vote. (the "old cry" makes sense both ways)

bd by "you" I meant the UN as they are the ones I am aiming my criticism. I apoligise if I was vague.

i am not defending Israel "inhumane practices", I am merely pointing out that you are not condemning other countries with far worse practices. It is ridiculous to say (as if it was true) that a country that has support, is bad only because it does, because violating human rights is obviously not why, because you are only condemning Israel which is not the only country violating human rights.

Hmmmm who do we have talking here? an alien or an animal. Not we humans it was you humans. Got me interest. thats funny. i see no reason why relegion should be banned in my view banning relegion is more of a way of taking away freedom than not doing so. if you dont like relegion dont practise it i dont see why you want everyone else to not practice it either.

In Cuba? you could still say that, I have nothing against her, but in 1975 when she was found guilty of cheating in her last campaign she declared a state of national emergence and called for the arrest of her political foes. in 1977 in an election that she called, she lost. when she came back into power, in responce to Sikh terrorists she assualted the Golden Temple. At her death her SON went into power (to my knowlege there was no election)

Because that assumption is not true. Israel is a big human rights abuser. It is targeted for its acts. yes, Israel is a human rights abuser but the point of the opposition is that countries who's abuses are far more deadly, are being ignored, while Israel is being crushed for everything that it does (not that that is bad, but it should be applied thoroughly).

Well said.

very interesting caesar . what i mean is what do you think of it, not whatever you thought I meant (i really dont know what you meant).

Could people please give me your views on this i dont know what to think.

Yes because Saddam was oh-so close to coming over the North Pole.... Canada is a enormous, geographically isolated nation. We just don't face very many threats. black dog i think that he meant it wouldnt take very long for Canada to be taken over if there was an american leader like Saddam (and dont say GWB is like him because he wont invade canada).

Dear I miss Reagan, thank you.

caesar, I would like to see the list. give me one example when a country, other than the US or Israel, has given back land won in a war not started by themselves. Also the only reason if any that it is illegal for them is because the UN has said so, therefore either you have agreed with Argus or you have been simply saying anything that you want if it is true or not. There are also many hardliners in Israel that want the same thing to happen to the Jews, but instead of thinking dirty thoughts, or writing a hateful newspaper article, they are willing to give their life away :angry:

I know, i like having 50 states. I doubt that castro would like to join canada ...

that was what i meant. if you didnt want it then you should be forced to pay for it. I personally think that the news part is pretty accurate but i dont watch the commentator (Im sorry if you thought that i was offensive, i was trying to convey my dream, not reality )

ok... I have just finished reading this thread. What I think is that if enough canadians are willing to pay to watch fox then they should be given the oppretunity. those who feel otherwise can choose whether or not to pay for it (ie. it should be something that you can choose to have for anouther fraction of the cable bill).

Jesusland? why doesnt the united states of canada get delaware?