CANADIEN

Nobody forceed the people to take those loans with a gun. Nobody forced the banks to offer those loans either. Either bank executives did it knowing full well most of these people would not be able to pay, then sold the loans, defrauded and lied. Or there were downright incompetent and stupid.

If someone was sugesting all men be treated like rapists until proven otherwise, most people would say it's non-sense. And if somebody mentioned rapes committed by women, nobody would accuse them of siding with/defending/protecting rapists. To do so would be viewed, are rightly so, as silly. Thanks for the opportunity to make my point yet again.

This monstruous act of terrorism is many things. A genocide it is not.

Since mentioning that SOME terrorists acts have been committed by SOME people claiming to be Christians (I do not see much of anything Christian in their actions) is a no-no, let's point out that other non-Muslims have committed terrorist acts. whether it's the bombing of the Air India flight, the actions of left-wing terrorist groups from Japon, Germany, Italy or Peru, or crimes by the Jewish Defense League. Makes it more difficult to claim that references to the fact terrorism is a threat no matter the source more difficult to dismiss under the bogus claim they are anti-Christian.

Why denying the FACT that terrorism and radicalism is a threat, no matter where is comes from? To claim otherwise is, at best absurdity. And so is claiming that I am insinuating, or claiming, that I am targetting Christians. As I said, anyone who reads an attack on Christians in my postings needs a pair of glasses. As for your shrugging off of non-Muslim terrorism as a statistics, feel free to tell that to the loved ones of any victim of any terrorist attack. Correction... as you claim.Try to excuse these terrorists anyway you want. They are, as you admit yourself, radicals. Who murder. In an organized fashion. For ideological reasons. Which makes them terrorists. Most pro-life organizations do not defend them, for a reason, a very good reason. As for the "they are saving lives" excuse, their actions speak for themselves. Their acts are not about defending life, they are motivated by hatred. They have not hesitated to attack abortion doctors in their homes, with their spouses and children present, intentionally putting the lives of children in danger. Muslim terrorists too claim that they are defending innocent lives, that of millions of Muslims who have nothing to do with their actions. I do not buy that excuse either.

Not a conflict of interest one bit, no matter how one wants to put it.

The issue is not who does more of what. The issue is that terrorism is to be faced, confronted and defeated no matter who does it, how many they are, how many they kill, and what there excuse is. None can be, or should be ignored or shrugged away because "that other group did worse". Nor should killing s of abortion doctors or attacks on abortion clinics be treated as anything other than what it is, terrorism.

Saying that anybody here has claimed that Christians are worse than Muslim is a lie.

How dare you grab all the spotlight? I am a Christian who would not be welcome in his theocracy either.

This coming from the guy who wants an authoritarian (dictatorial) regime, admires Franco the DICTATOR, remembers fondly the days when everyone looked the same, and will shoot hysterically "you defend terrorists, you want Canada to be like Saudi Arabia" everytime someone dares to point out that radicalism is a danger no matter where it comes from.

But we should treat all of them as potential terrorists, right?

It is at most a case of judgement, and even then. This is not a case of morality.

I have no problem seeing who my enemy is. It is anybody who holds and propagate extremist views or who wants to replace our democratic institutions.

Oh believe me, I am against you. And as long as you keep on with your bigoted rhetoric, foundness for dictators, demonizing the many for the actions and thoughts of the few, and making false claims that peole here are defending radical Islam, I will be against you. Get used to it. And we still both know that nobody here has said there are no Muslim terrorists, nobody here has said that this is just a pipe dream, and nobody here has said we should do nothing.

I prefer to live in a time where I am treated based on my actions and my opinions. Not pre-conceived and bigoted notions.

Don't worry, he will back track on this one... like the time he was arguing that Muslims and Jews killing each other would be a good thing for Christiannity.

Nobody here has said that Nobody here has said that. Nobody here has said that.

Bad bad Hitler... Because of him people started wondering if bigotry and hatred was such a good thing after all.

Extremism IS becoming a problem. One more reason not to demonize an entire group of people because of the actions of a few.

Nobody here has said that, or anything even remotely closed to that. If that's what you read in ANY of my postings, go have your eyes examined. People who murder abortion doctors are terrorists. Plain and simple. I have said before that nobody here has defended terrorists. I stand corrected... you just did. And btw, in case you are tmepted to make yourself even more odious by claiming otherwise, I am completely and 100% opposed to abortion.

It was not a case of not being careful with his words. He clearly accused the man of thinking pedophilia was OK.

She never offended me, so there is nothing I have to forgive her for. But she still took what would have been a defeat and turned it into a near-destruction.

That's right, you do get it. Nobody here has defended radical Islam or saudi Arabia. Nobody here has said they'd want to leave there. Only one person here has promoted theocracy for Canada, and that person is you. Don't worry, your attempts at demonizing each and every Muslim in Canada and any person who does not share your bigotry will not work. And feel free to make a fool of yourself anytime you want by claiming that I have just defendent ANY form of radicalism.

The guy who once taught at a school where the curriculum included condemnations of democracy as being against God. The guy who had the poeple of Alberta pay for a settlement in a lawsuit against him for defamatory statements he had made about a lawyer who was merely doing his job and only repaid part of it when confronted. Your type of man.

Let me clarify. Nobody here has said they were OK with the murder. Contrary to what a certain person claims.