Jump to content

msdogfood

Member
  • Posts

    527
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by msdogfood

  1. ok i got it i think?? Thank- you!.
  2. true but the timeing is Very bad if your the PNO or DND!
  3. I did in the post but i can not fix it in the thread subject line moderator's are the only ones who can do that! Thank you.
  4. Yes, according to the Department of Justice, earlier this week, Deputy Minister John H. Sims -- a three-plus-decade veteran of the civil service -- gave notice, via widely-distributed letter, that he would be leaving his post, effective April 1. The news apparently provoked mild-to-middling surprise on the mandarin circuit, since generally speaking, the imminent departure of such a senior official would have been telegraphed months in advance, and not announced in a brief note just two weeks before his last day on the job. The timing is especially curious given how deeply enmeshed in the Afghan detainee controversy his soon to be former department has become, particularly given yesterday's Questions of Privilege. See link!
  5. How do i get the MultiQuote to work?.
  6. well we did sine the Janeva confetone so that is the legalitys!
  7. The beer is being donated to a charity! all so there was no money but on this bet so it may not be agents the law!
  8. what the hell is this???.
  9. The name has been fixed except for the title which cannot be edited. Does anyone want to take a crack at answering this multi-faceted question or is it too unfocused and nobody can understand it. Hoping to see your input. Thanks
  10. I will fix his name later I dont have the time now what do all if you think of my point of view of legal preacher do i have a point???. thanks!
  11. This is more a legal than political question however it has everything to do with the Prime Minister's Office and the Conservative Party of Canada. This is a multi-point question so please bear with me. The issue of the questions deals with Afghan detainee operations. The government recently retained the services of former Supreme Court Justice Iacobucci to review the classified documents associated with the file. Here are my questions. Point 1: Mr. Iacobucci is no longer a sitting judge so I am assuming there is no guarantee the government will give him the complete set of classified documents as he will no longer have an active security clearance. Am I correct with that assumption? Point 2: Assume they gave him all of the documents and he begins reviewing them. If there is clear evidence of complicity in torture or direct knowledge of torture or the participation in torture, is Iacobucci required to also report it to The Hague breaching attorney client privilege? Point 3: Because Iacobucci is no longer a member of one of the executive bodies of the country such as Parliament or the Supreme Court, hasn't the government unintentionally created a perfect prosecution witness against the government of Canada if Canada is ever charged with committing a war crime? We are a signator to the International Criminal Court. Point 4: Even if it doesn't get to the level of a war crime, some of the information will come out - probably enough for civil litigation. The former justice will be one of the key witnesses so hasn't he tied himself up by being required to go to civil litigation cases for the next 10 years depending on the information that comes out. Point 5: If most of the scenarios come true, Iacobucci as a former judge would want this to come out. As a form of self defense he would have to make public what he found. If information is found but not reported to the proper parties, Iacobucci would be found guilty in participating in a conspiracy to cover up a war crime if it ever gets to The Hague. In the end, isn't it more dangerous to the government of Canada hiring a lawyer such as Iacobucci given all of the obligations as an attorney and possibly the obligations under international law in reporting what is found. Thanks
  12. is the report public? has anyone seen it yet or have news?? thanks!
  13. how can you make that clam??
  14. so whan do you think there will be an electron next??.
  15. under this PMO what ware you expecting??
  16. The pmo did know as well as DND & foreign affairs to.
  17. That is fine we need to see all the info asap!
  18. Hillier will probably be cherd with a war crime!!
×
×
  • Create New...