ThatGuy

The Bloc propped the tories up for 2 years. Funny how that isn't mentioned much.

Rae is a smart man. What happened in Ontario wasn't his fault.

Well, I mean, if Iggy controls 13 seats worth of Liberals, they could float the Tories through a budget.

I think that for the best possible leadership group, at least Iggy has to get a post.

Yes, Duceppe will get nothing. At the end of the day, they are just voting with the Lib/NDP instead of the Conservatives.

I was under the assumption that she just has to look pretty an fly around the world having fun. Surely some experts will make this decision for her.

The Bloc has been allowed to exist, therefore you can't stop them from supporting something. If Harper wooed them we wouldn't have this situation occurring.

Who cares. Frank Mahovolich rocks.

Here is a fake one that I thought could be interesting: Minister of Coalition Affairs: Best looking female MP in either party

I will go out on a limb: Finance Minister: Paul Martin

You have 18 Liberals and 6 NDP to work with here. Who do you think would get what?

Oh, my bad. Anyway, no one should want to separate, this is just democratic process. If you are on the winning or losing team, who cares really, its the constitution at work.

It is always about selling papers.

The constitution writers couldn't have forseen or vast expansion west, especially with such a strong nation to the south.

I wouldn't doubt it. I could see the NDP vanishing once this is all said and down. A taste of some form of power could do the trick.

I can't see how this will result in the breakup of the country. I figured that Alberta might want a little bit of a chance since the price of oil is falling fast.

I have no idea why, but when I entered this thread I started to think about Hal Johnson and Joanne McLoed

I actually really liked what you had to say. My faith in Canadians is restored a smidgen.

What is the difference between the Bloq keeing Harper in power and the Bloq keeping the Liberals in power? If the Liberals and NDP wanted a coalition and the Bloq didn't, they would be supporting the Tories right. They actually have elected representatives. The problem is that they are allowed to do so, not that they have them now. Since they are there, they have to pick a side. In 2004, Harper wanted them on his.

It will be binded to last 18 months MINIMUM.

My response was only to him I hope we can get into it seriosly

Nor should they. The mighty Dion has nerded this plan into action.

On everything. He is always bitter. Why couldn't he have just walked over to Dion's office and had a drink and talk about how crappy the economy is. They could have chummed around like Bert and Ernie.

There are so many wierd parts to that post that I would first have to rephrase everything you said into truths, then respond. Instead I think that I will listen to Matt Good and drink a beer.

Only reasonably intelligent answers please. Former title of thread "Why has Harper always been so bitter?" merged into this previous thread by moderator.