
charter.rights
Member-
Posts
3,584 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by charter.rights
-
Narcissists hang out where they are not wanted, most the time. So his low self-esteem feeds into his "isms"
-
If you think I haven't done what I said, go back and read the entire thread. I have provide history, legal opinions, and Supreme Court rulings to back it up. Mr. Canada has no defense. So doing it on his behalf would be infantile.
-
Of course I have provided reams of documents, references and maps that clearly make my position, and Mr. Canada simply comes (once again) with his denial. He has no refutation and is the one that more often than not comes with straw man, hyperbole and ad hominen as his only arguments. I wouldn't waste your time with him. Sycophants like Mr. Canada simply use these kinds of forums to soothe their low self-esteem.
-
how do you deal with bad news?
charter.rights replied to msdogfood's topic in Moral & Ethical Issues
Alas...you are the perpetual loser. -
how do you deal with bad news?
charter.rights replied to msdogfood's topic in Moral & Ethical Issues
1. Good! 2. Yes it is violence. 3. You're incorrect. But I don't expect much more from a blond. -
how do you deal with bad news?
charter.rights replied to msdogfood's topic in Moral & Ethical Issues
Those stages of grief are universal as well to other problems such as divorce, loss of a job etc. If one recognizes and allows the stages to unfold in quiet reflection, it will be an easier result. -
how do you deal with bad news?
charter.rights replied to msdogfood's topic in Moral & Ethical Issues
I hope your children aren't included in that, or that they aren't around when you resort to violence to express your anger. -
Told you. If you had a brain you might have figured out the Iroquois Nationals, by now. Instead, true to usual and natural form all you have is ad hominem and straw man rhetoric. Such a waste of little manhood.
-
No. There is a bigger difference than that. I don't live under bridges and throw rocks at passers by.
-
I guess you don't know how to read.
-
Ask a lazy question - get a lazy answer. The POINT is that co-operation between the RCMP and the FBI is substantial.
-
According to Google...around 300,000 times (hits)
-
That's co-operation. The same co-operation that exists when the RCMP call in the FBI for independent assistance. And so you need a geography lesson. Kahnawake is not Akwesasne. Different places.
-
Nope! Akwesasne and Six Nations determine what is best for the convicted, not outside courts.
-
We've long ago established where your shiny head lies on white sheets..... But equity and equality go hand in hand. Native people get a bum rap from the kinds of Canadians who idolize Hitler, Residential School priests and crooked Indian Agents. Correcting injustice requires more than pulling one's pants down in a jail cell yelling unfair treatment. And dispelling your myths is only a part-time job, since you aren't very smart when it comes to law and justice.
-
Not that it is any of your business....but I work closely with a number of Mohawk communities on a daily basis. The mythical history and law promoted by many people here is not the same as the actual history and law. I merely point out the latter to those who promote ignorance as truth.
-
The Campbell Treaty provided that every native caught off their territory, and every British citizen caught on territory committing a crime will be returned to their respective nations for trial and sentencing under their own respective laws. This was one initiated by the British because they were so afraid of the Iroquois punishments that they wanted immunity from it. So those who proclaim immunity are not doing it on a whim, but according to an international treaty.
-
Nope! Try again. They are Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) Nationals. Have another drink and toke. It might begin to make more sense.
-
In the case of Six Nations or Akwesasne they are held in their own jails and tried by their own judges from the territory. Others are taken to local jails and tried according to Canadian law by agreement with those territories. In any case Ontario law is never applied on the territory and only laws of common application (such as murder etc) are applicable on reserve. Other crimes (such as theft, assault etc) are dealt with by local custom - Longhouse Councils, tribal circles, community justice forums etc. And finally, if a Mohawk from any of those territories does appear in a court outside of their territory (for crimes committed off territory etc) then the courts are required under our laws to take into consideration the fact that they are natives, and when determining bail or other fines consider what impact that will have on the native's community, family etc. As well, before any sentencing, Gladue reports are required to be submitted to the courts identifying alternative punishments that have to be considered. So really while there may be some cross-over, the relationship between Mohawks and the courts is not the same as between us and our courts because Canadian laws - especially the Charter - protect the sovereign relationship.
-
No. But that does not stop Canadian Authorities from trying to impose our laws on them. The Silver Covenant Chain - A Treaty of Goodwill, Friendship and Peace defines the relationship between the Haudenosaunee (Mohawk nation of the Confederation) and the Crown as independent sovereign allies and was reinforced in the Royal Proclamation 1763 (now entrenched in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms).
-
Mohawks are not Canadian.
-
He doesn't read the articles and links -that much is clear. He is only here for ad hominem attacks and advancing fallacy arguments.
-
It can't. Thoughtful, intelligent and coherent discussion and debate is the centrefold of a forum like this. If you are out of your league here then that is really YOUR problem. Thus again, you appear out of touch with what discussion forums are all about. If you want trolling go to Canadian Politics and Issues. They have plenty of room for trolls.
-
Well...I guess there had to be some idiots that voted for John Tory....right?
-
In my last visit to Akwesasne, I was informed that it was still being reviewed by Homeland Security. However, it has been accepted in principle and the questions revolve around the colour of the card, and the information required on the chip.