no queenslave

we need to stop the government propaganda education system from indoctrinating the people to believe we have a constitution and have a democratic government. After 70 years of government lies it will take some time to get the people to understand what a democracy is. Maybe we should ask the Iraq people how they got their democratic government- by a referendum of the people? If a democracy can be created by the same people who were in power before a countries independence can remain in power, with the same powers; after a country declares its a democratic government of a sovereign country ; then why was it not done in IRAQ?

And why was the 14 year old charged with manslaughter after he ran his car off the road and killed his 2 passengers?Did he intend to kill them?

What Trudeau did was crap. What part do you remember- that it was never passed? So if you have no formal constitution what governs the power of the government as to what they can do; become a dictatorship? NOTHWITHSTANDING.

What is the accident; his tazer went off by itself? Or was it an accident he put his knee on his neck while he was incapacitated ?

Why don't you give it a rest? You can not even admit the fact that Canadians have never ratified a constitution by a referendum; like the people in Iraq . Only supporters of a corrupt government do not want to admit that their country is not a democracy; but in practice a police state.How many more years of government denial? When Iraq became a democracy what happened to the old government; they did not continue as the government, did they; why?Why in Canada did the government continued to govern as if Canada was still a colony? Where is the new constitution and new government? Same old colonial rulers with a queen.

it is pathetic to see the supporters of a police state justify the killing of a man.

Just as I suspected; you think the people of Canada have no rights. Dictators operate that way. You are the one with government spam; is that your second can?

http:www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/electionindex.htm Do we need the U.S. to help us ; like they did in Iraq? Canadian people have never ratified a constitution. The governing of Canada since the Statute of westminster has been by fraud and corruption of politicians who just assumed power without any right to do so by the sovereign people of Canada.

when you can post how a people go from a colonial government to a sovereign province-country;you may understand .

Canada has no valid ratified constitution; just a dictatorship government that assumed power after the Statute of Westminster gave the people and provinces their sovereignty and independence . " Qween Elizabeth personally hands me my paycheck every week just to post on bulletin boards" quote by jbg " IT IS NOT A COURT CASE THAT DETERMINED YOU OWED MONEY" quote by bk59 Canada is not a democracy.

Alberta hasn't separated because they have people who do not understand the benefits of a sovereign province as a starting point for a democratic country.

If the west was to expel all french people to quebec with no compensation or right of return what would you call it? a democracy.

Just as true as all your other post. " It IS NOT A COURT CASE THAT DETERMINED YOU OWED MONEY" quote by bk 59 jbg wanted his paycheck

why were the mounties called; and by who? the man was in a secure area so they knew he had no weapons ; what danger was he to anyone? The airport staff knew who he was and where he was from. The first thing they should of done was called his mother; who was asking about him, not a gang of taser jockys.. And when the mounties responded what information did they ask? CAN I TASER HIM? Canada is a dictatorship and this act proves how a police state operates.

what a country; with all your advice.

With the kind of dictatorship government in Canada what did you expect in how the government acts in Afghanistan?. Canada is run by colonial powers in the name of a queen.

Only if used as a one or 2 jolt system; give me one manufacture that said you could continue to shock the subject till your battery discharges. In order to be a safe unit their has to be a means of insuring some dumb cop wont continue to shock the person till he dies.

Canadians had two chances to ratify a constitution and have never ratified a constitution as to how much power they wanted government to have. The government just continues to assume more power all the time; that is how dictators govern. "IT IS NOT A COURT CASE THAT DETERMINED YOU OWED MONEY" quote by bk 59 Must of been the queens herself.

The only reason for the wires is to allow the continuing of multiple hits of electricity, without the public knowing how many times the subject was shocked. It is a deadly weapon as designed.

tasers are designed to be a deadly weapon; if they weren't they would not be a need for wires so you could continue to keep shocking the subject. They can be designed as charged capacitors and no wires, so you could tell how many times the subject was hit. Time for a class action lawsuit against the manufactures ,and users who killed people by their use.

Tasers are a deadly weapon. New ones boast of a charge sufficient for 50 hits; and that is where the problem is. They should only hold 1 charge for 1 hit and then have to be reloaded. The way the police use them is to use multiple hits. I would like any user to see how many consecutive hits he can take before he dies. It is time for the manufactures to change them to a one shot charge; or demonstrate they can withstand all 50 shots..

All she had to do is act humane and grant a right of return for the Palestinians.' instead as a racist with ethnic cleansing actions.

The Statute of Westminster. 1931 And wheras it is in accord with the established constitutional position that NO LAW hereafter made by the parliament of the United Kingdom shall extend to any of the said Dominions as part of the law of that Dominion otherwise than at the request and with the consent of that Dpominion. @. (1) The Colonial Laws Validity Act 1865, shall not apply to any law made after the commencement of this Act by the parliament of a Dominion. (2) NO law and NO provision of any law made after the commencement of this act by the parliament of a dominion shall be void or inoperative on the ground that it is repugnant to the law of England, or to the provisions of any existing or future act of parliament of the United Kingdom, or to any order, rule, or regulation made under any such act, and the powers of the parliament of a dominion shall include the power to repeal or amend any such act, order, rule or regulation in so far as the same is part of the law of the Dominion. 7. (2)The provision of section two of this act shall extend to laws made by any of the provinces of Canada and to the powers of the legislatures of such provinces. 9 ( (1) note this section does not include Canada so if a province can pass any law it wants that is sovereignty. It is just up to the people to write and ratify a constitution as to what powers it wants the province to have; including sovereignty. The people have never requested or ratified any power the federal government wanted. The federal government just became a corrupt dictatorship.

The system of adding more members to the house of commons is an example of how outdated the constitution is. How many more members would be added with a doubling of population? When will a new building be required to house all the dummies?

Do you understand how bills passed in parliament become law; who has to sign them?