no queenslave

There was a state called palistine which the jews wanted to control and started the war to gain control over the palistinian state. What is a Canadian? What nationality?Are first nations people Canadians?

And by your argument you imply the U.S.Has total rights to the moon no matter what anybody else does. The U.S. are the aboriginals of the moon.

and any native land claims are for part of a larger nation never an independent state Where is your documentation for each aboriginal nation of the continent of north America; ?.Just a group of squatters.

At least you admit one thing ; Aboriginals do not own land. So it could not be stolen from them so quit bitching. Palestine was recognized by the British by de facto recognition, So why is the government making land claim settlements with the Aboriginals if they Do not own land? Who are they paying land taxes to? The charter of equality- if they don't have to pay land taxes then why should anybody else? All you have is a dictatorship government trying to apease the aboriginals on the backs of other taxpayers. must be like golda m saying you forced us to kill your sons. If the Aboriginals don't own the land ; who does the queen? We did not agree to give natives anything ; it was the queen as ruler of the colony. And by the same de facto recognition of canada as a sovereign state - country by the U.N. no british law or treaty no longer applies. Access to land rights is an old british lord right. A master with slaves.

thanks for realizing that i win..

so do you want the Ottoman Empire reinstated?Just like the first nations think they should be.

and by what means is the first nations people different? Did they pay taxes; and what does paying taxes do?

just proving my point.

http://www.palestineremembered.com/Acre/Maps/Story583.html

took it away to where? Maybe you can find it. The Palestinians had their own nation till the U.N. created the state of Israel. The land is not the property of the first nations or any other group of people. Are the first nations racist in thinking they are the sole owners of land? The governing of people in any land is another story. Who did the first nations steal the land from; or have they a document saying they bought it from someone? Quit living in the past. Time to settle the misunderstanding with a written document as to what the first nation people think they want. How far back in history do you want to go and return land to former rulers of land. How about giving Iraq back to Saddams family as he once controlled it? Do the Americans own the moon as they were their first? That is the reasoning of the first nations claim. Nobody took land away; just different people control it. The question is do you want to have a say in how the land is governed or not? Or do you want a separat part of the country to set up another dictatorship?

If you think you should have your own sovereign country then go to the U.N. and ask for Quebec to be recognized as your sovereign country; as it has already been recognized as a distinct society. If you think you have some other rights look at how the Palestinians have been treated by the state of Israel .

time to wake up julienne , you have a lot of work to do .

N.S.A.G. vs Canada 1951 SCr 31 dlr 369 In the supreme court in 1951 the ruling was the constitution belonged to the people and the federal government or provinces or acting together they could not change the constitution because it belonged to the people and they alone could change it. The amending formula is in violation of the supreme court case 1951. Just because the government appoints corrupt judges to support its dictatorship , does not make it legal. The government can't have whatever they want and call them self a democracy. You are still allowing the government and queen to rule the country as a colony. Just like Iraq or Afghanistan a democracy is created by the free and sovereign people agreeing on a constitution and ratifying it by a referendum vote by all the people; not just sum politicians; as in the dictatorship we have. You can vote for whoever you want as long as they obey the queen. SADDAM ruled by convention. The statute of westminster did by statute for Canadians , what the americans did by war-force;in creating free sovereign people of Iraq and Afghanistan so they could form a democratic government.

" he drove a hatchet through the walls of the house" how many walls would that be? Did he have a licence to drive his hatchet? a little exaggerated i think. You think he was making holes in the walls so he could be tasered?

it doesn't work at all in the best interest of the people.

it don't look like these posters are concerned as to how the country is run but have demonstrated by their post they are more concerned about what is comming out of the other end they are stuffing. It is not a court case that determined you owed money Quote by bk 59 it is just someone following the queens orders. Slaves Federal personal income tax is a form of slavery -control practiced by a corrupt dictatorship government. It takes more than one person to operate a dictatorship. Are you dooing your part?

http://wikipedia.org/wiki/income_tax#count...onal_income_tax go to 6 . QUEEN If you do away with the queen then you may have a democracy. Nothing is legal in Canada withouth her. why are you pushing red pills? Canadas government is the same as Saddam's government was , only ours is run in the name of the queen; not the head of the political party.

http://detaxcanada.org/kuhl.htm

and you were thought this ideology where? Where is your document creating a federation- signed by each province and ratified by a referendum of the people of each province. You are thinking of how a dictatorship operates not a democracy. The statute of Westminster was requested ,to give the people and Canada its sovereignty; if a democracy and sovereignty can be given to a government in power then it would of been done in Iraq and Afghanistan. Thechnically if aboriginal rights vest in the crown ; when the crown gave the people of Canada their sovereignty that made aboriginal rights nul and void; just like the rights of the former war lords in Afghanistan when their new constitution was created and ratified... If aboriginals want a sovereign country then say so and go to the U.N.and ask for the province of Quebec to be your sovereign country as it has already been recognized as a distinct society. What do you realy want??

http://detaxcanada.org/kuhl Walter F Kuhl and you have ?? Quit changing it http://detaxcanada.org/kuhl.htm and R.Rogers Smith and his findings on the subject

http://detaxcanada.org/kuhl.htm Walter F. Kuhl

http://detaxcanada.org/kuh[.htm/url] Walter F Kuhl. http://detaxcanada.org/kuhl.htm://http://detaxcanada.org/kuh[.htm/url...da.org/kuhl.htm

With all this learning what documents were presented to dispute Walter. F. Kuhl factual document ? A copy can be had at http://detaxcanada.org/kuhl.htm If you did not deal with his factual findings it is because your professor has no factual evidince to disprove his findings, and his only job is to indoctrinate you into believing something else When do you intend to go to federal tax court and see for yourself the charter is meaningless when it comes to the government controlling you through the tax system?. Federal personal income tax is a form of slavery-control practiced by a corrupt dictatorship government.

Your demonstration of your illegal act of invading my computer , is tipical of government control. Who is funding this web has demonstrated what it's purpose is.

When did Canada go from a colony to a sovereign country and by what document?What changed as to the governing of Canada? How could colonial political rulers continue as if nothing changed? Have you ever been to tax court? If not why not? What good is the charter of rights if it does not apply in tax court; your governments major way of controlling you? If you cant not answer the above then your political science class was for what purpose ? Which post are obvious to anyone with some form of reasoning. Do you understand what this web site is about; and what is it's purpose? Did they teach you about indoctrination ; or were you just a subject?. Who is paying the interest on the loan you got? How much of the university budget comes from government funding?