no queenslave

For all government posters who think the government has the power to raise money by any and all means; you only have to understand who wrote and requested such powers- lawyers. As instructed by wanabe dictators. I see nobody has disputed the fact the government can not raise money by any and all means. Such as employing the hells ang..s to collect a fresh air tax on you for breathing.

Just because you had to fight for your independence and ours was supposed given to us ;independence is the same, no more British control, and that includes the B.N.A.Act. Just because the politicians did not want to give up control and did not want the people to change the powers of the government the people were not told of their sovereignty. If i steal something is it mine? The government stole power to govern. The Canadian colonies wanted a sovereign country as was demonstrated by the Quebec resolutions, but the British could not do this as they were in negotiations with the U.S. and wanted to use the colonies as part of their settlement.; if Canada was sovereign they could not do this.

If the B.N.A.act is irrelevant then you have no other constitutional act; but you claim to so post it, 1867. Who controlled the United States before their independence? That is why.

wikipedia is not even recognized as a source of facts for university papers. Saying what happen from the governments point of view as though it was legal is propaganda.

And how did the united States get their independence sovereignty , and from who?.Did they keep any former government laws or create a constitution of their own?Why don't you think Canadians can't do the same thing but still have to keep an old british law- B.N.A.act.

The more democratic way must be like how the U.S. was created. Send in the war mongers. You must be able to explain the chaos beyond imagination ; why such propaganda?Their will be no chaos; except for the ruling corrupt government, and the appointed corrupt judges loosing power.

www.fin.gc.ca/FEDPROV/alpaye.html Department of Canada finance.

Too bad you did not understand the post ; as it referred to 1890-1900 and the second sons of the wealthy people who were paid to stay here. I know you will post the census of the population of the west for 1900 to show you are right. Or you are just flat out boollock.

Does it apply to the U.S. ; why not?If the B.N.A.Act was to be a constitution for Canada then the name would of been the Constitution of Canada.It was just a guide for colonial rulers ruling the united colony of Canada , with the fraud of getting you to think it was something else.

Only to someone who is indoctrinated and has no understanding of the Canadian history and political lies ; and thinke they know something, when all they know is propaganda. If their was little public opposition after all the media and government money then why was it not passed?Just another lie.

legal definition of democracy-the form of government in which the sovereign power resides in and is exercised by the whole body of the free citizens directly or indirectly through a system of representation as distinguished from a monarchy. The Canadian people were never given a chance to use their sovereignty and independence; because the political people in power did not permit or facilitate it. If you think the B.N.A.Act continues then so does the monarchy and canada as a colony. You can not have both at the same time.Which do you want? what you have now is massive corruption in the courts and political system.

Does the U.S. still have the same constitution it had befor they declared their independence-NO. When the provinces and people were given their independence and sovereignty ; they legally no longer were governed by the B.N.A.Act. just like the Americans.The politicians just assumed power and kept power just like any other dictatorship does. How many people ran in any other dictatorship or comunist government; running does not create a democracy.

Too bad you don't understand what you just posted "lets the federal government legislate everything that DOES NOT fall under the classes in sec 92." Direct taxation is the subject class; for provincial is not the subjet class in the sentance.. If you apply the same restriction then the federal government can collect income taxes from anyone in the world because they can collect by any and all means legal or unlawful. Love the power you think you have. When are you going to start using the any and all means to collect $50 on every provincial drivers license , or any other provincial license? Because the fee collected by the provinces on anything that does not say for provincial purposes it must be unlawful bu your reasoning, just another federal power..Have you posted enough government propaganda yet to get to be a appointed atax court judge. After all you have allready been told what the outcome of the case will be . Provincial income taxes only for provincial purposes- then equalization payments have to be calculated withouth albertas income from income taxes; or better yet because it goes into general revenue all revenue is exempt from equalization payment calculations. If you have no documents of the quebec resolutions or british hansard in the passing of the B.N.A.Act then do your DD, before you try and tell me what you think you know; it is all out of context.

you are a government poster who continues to misslead; you still refuse to post the first and last paragraph of section 91; because it limits the federal spending powers to that class of subjects that are not the exclusive power of the provinces - direct taxes- is the subject; the for provincial purposes is irrelevant, or more specific in that direct taxes are exclusive for provincial purposes, as explained by lord canarvin in the passing of the bill. you must be pushing your corrupt interrpitacion with the hope of becoming a supreme court corrupt judge. What is the class of subjects reffed to?

once by voting against lying pet's fraud document called Meech lake accord , and the second attempt by the conservatives. In a democracy that means we have no constitution. In our governments assuming of power after 1931 that is a form of corrupt dictatorship. The bna act as a source of power for the governments power is demonstrated as the fraud it is by them not being willing to use it as the source of their power . In a democracy the politicians swear to protect and obey a constitution ; not in Canada ; because Canada has no ratified constitution as accepted by the people.The politicians pledge to protect the queen as their only sorce of their power to govern; but the queen gave the people their freedom from her rule by the Statute of westminster. That makes the politicians dictators by assuming power to govern, and lies by calling their government a democracy.

you have no understanding of a tax you have a choice of paying or one which you have no choice. I am not a mindless slave government paid posters like . if you dont even understant that then your name suits you as definition of bambino is baby, and your post demonstrates that.

yes

You need to understand what is written -section7.2 (2) no law and no provision of any law made after the commencement of this Act by the parliament of a province shall be void or inoperative . So any province can make a law declaring it a sovereign province. You still refuse to admit the limited powers of the federal government by the limiting clauses that control section 91. I exclusively own all rights to 1,2,3 and 4you own the rights of all other numbers to 9. Does it give you the right to 123and 4 for your purposes? This is what you are arguing by not understanding the preamble and post amble claues limiting section 91's limited powers. the provincial government has exclusive powers of direct taxation for provincial purposes or what purposes do you think it should have the exclusive power for? If as you want then the federal government can say it has all provincial powers for federal purposes. Just like any other dictator, and by appointing corrupt judges that is what they rule., when they ruled the federal government has the power of direct taxation. What a bunch of corrupt judges that don't understand the term exclusive.

Whoo- its own federal and provincial taxes- If it is a republic then what is federal and what is provincial; or would they become one? The rest is agreeable. time to have a constitution where everyone is equal. No special status for anyone. I prefer no personal income taxes ; as it is to bureaucratic, and the same taxes could be collected as a tax payed by employers on employees wages . one tax form for each company insated of hundreds of tax forms for each person employed. Isn't that is what the companies are now doing by deducting federal taxes from your paycheck now. The only difference is you would not have to file personal income tax forms. sorry all you ccra overpaid corrupt dictators with a god mentality; most of you would be out of a job. A much less costly system to opperate. No personal income taxes would solve the native problem; making everyone equal. No advantage to stay on reserves, and collect welfare.

All provinces should have a free net royalty interest in any natural resource developed in their province of from 5-10%.

You haven't a clue how the system works. You never have a chance to plead your case. They have perfected the corruption-its called supra-Their is no such thing as innocent till proven quilty in a court.

Tax Matters http://www.constitution.org/cs_taxes.htm What is the -Seperation Party of Alberta - dooing???

Don't you think the recognition of YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND INDEPENDENCE is important to you? If you want change this is the document that gives you the power to make any changes you want to Canada's system of government. The federal government might not like it , but if they object it will be confirmation of the dictatorship government you allow.

Said just like a dictator . sure you aren't one of Saddams former government members. In a dictatorship when you appoint corrupt judges to fix court cases for you what do you expect the judgment to be? If you have read the reports- Canada a country without a constitution and Alberta has the right to issue and use its own credit; instead of pushing government propaganda of the government as they have indoctrinated you. Saddam's courts operated with the same form of justice, as Canada's justice system does.. The water tight compartments refer to in the supreme court are as leaky as your pampers. Refer to the queen's bench Winnipeg file no 05-01-43232 and you will see a demonstration of how corrupt he justice system is. Read the preamble of section 91 which limits the federal powers. Read the Statute of westmminster - No British law applies after the passing of it. The BNA.Act was a British law- and no longer applied after 1931.