no queenslave

How about if Americans deal with their own political mess ; and let Canadians deal with theirs. You have not disputed any hansard record as used by W.F. Kuhl in his findings ; with your other imaginary facts. All you are worried about is if Alberta sepperated ; they would change the free trade agreement , and collect more taxes on oil co.. The Statute of Westminster gave each province their sovereignty; to do what they wanted. To have a democracy you first have to have free people; who then give the government its powers. If the provinces could not agree on a constitution for a federal government then they have the right as a sovereign province to keep their sovereignty. Legal the provinces don't have to separate ; they were separated as sovereign provinces by the Statute of Westminster. Provide your other proof , that the people of the provinces ratified any contract between then to form a federal government after 1931. What document have you and what copy of a referendum of any province showing the ratification vote?

What are you a slave? In a democracy you can do what you want. If you would rather not go then don't. I see you have not found any evidence to dispute W.F. Kuhl's report . If your litigation practice is based on arguing the printed record ( hansard )of the government is not factual ; but your dreams are , no wonder you do not like your job.

I presume you have never heard of a law dictionary.That is where i got the legal definition from.Where do you get your facts from; the dictatorship government?.It only takes a small number of people to start the process of writing a constitution proposal(.; was the answer to your question-" Do you expect 32 million people to get together and write a constitution" Are you arguing the 2 attempts by the federal government were not valid because you and 31 million people did not write it ?); such as 1. The people are sovereign and they only give the government the following powers--- 2. Everyone is innocent until proved guilty in a fair trial. 3 . personal direct taxes is a form of slavery and the government does not have the power of personal direct taxation in any form.i 4 -Or whatever other power you think the government should or should not have. Once enough people have agreed on the text of a constitutional document ; it is put to a vote of the people just like the Charlottetown accord or the Quebec sepparation referendum was. You still don't understand what a democracy is ; it is not a momarchy ruled from the top down but a government given its powers from the people. Write your M.P.to explain to you when they will allow the people to exercise their powers given to them by the Statute of Westminster. Or don't you think he or she or it is capable ?

It is not a theory. just the facts of others. http://www.detaxcanada.org/kuhl.htm

do you understand this-http://www.detaxcanada.org/kuhl.htm-?

2. No law and no provision of any law made after the commencement of this act by the legislatures of any province shall be void or inoperative. That is the granting of sovereignty to the provinces; no matter how much the federal government protest and disputes it. Ask your M.P. to give you a letter signed by the queen that this is not so. There failure to do so is a demonstration of their dictatorship, and of them not getting any power from you; as is the requirement in a democracy.. Any province can pass a law saying no federal laws apply in the province . What is the federal dictatorship government to do but use it's appointed corrupt judges to state otherwise. Then call the queen to testify.

http://www.detaxcanada.org/kuhl.htm read and post what hansard you can come up with to disprove his findings. If a member of parliament could not get documents i am sure you government paid indoctrinated posters will come up with them, since you believe you have a democracy and you believe you have an M.P . to represent you..

your post had no merits at all. You did not post any hansard record in response to my question. And how many elected have accomplished separation?NONE. When the sovereign people of any province vote to separate which dictator will stop the process? Have you a letter from the queen saying she will not honor her Statute of Westminster granting each province their right of self government? In a democracy the government gets its power from sovereign people. By a referendum of the people of any province that they want to separate.

self employed for over30 years with no intention of working for someone else.

point out when Canada uses the U.S. as a foil- by who to prevent what.

How many colonies did Britain have in north America at the time of the B.N.A.Act? What documented evidence have you that they signed an agreement to unite? What government propaganda ?

How many colonies did Britain have in north America at the time of the B.N.A.Act? What documented evidence have you that they signed an agreement to unite? What government propaganda ?

Even the Alberta separation party looks like a failure; because they were more interested in getting elected then separation.

you are the one degrading the thread. you have not posted any hansard record to prove my post wrong; but still want to post ; demonstrating your lack of knowledge on the subject,.

alberta hasent sepperated because of indoctrinated people like you who have only government propaganda ; and call others who have documented evidence that they have no clue. You have no clue.When Alberta got it's right of independence in 1931 , what have you done since to create a constitution for Alberta- ZERO, because you are clueless. After you read Canada a country without a constitution by Walter F. Kuhl M.P, 1935 to 1949 ; then you may be able to understand that what you post is just government propaganda, as your clue. Dispute his hansard records as the evidence he relied on with your hansard record to dispute his findings. I know all you can do is try to discredit me and his findings; and you can not produce any hansard records to dispute the fact Canada has no valid constitution ratified by the sovereign people of Canada. You are no boss at all .

read the legal definition of a democracy i posted . On how to exercise the Crowns powers- for figureheads? In a dictatorship you don't have to worry about that; just get indoctrinated.Read government propaganda. How did it happen in Iraq or Afghanistan . How was the attempt to ratify the B.N.A.Act as our constitution done? People who are interested , draft a constitution, and a vote is held, the process is no secret..

when you have to call people like me ingrates is just a demonstration you have no valid evidence to support your government propaganda. At least Saddam did not try to fool the people he was running a democracy , like trudeau did with his lies and finger to the west. The Canadian government is so transparent that it has no valid constitution; and uses a queen for its power to govern , claiming she is just a figure-head. Any Canadian who cares to do some research , can easily understand the government is corrupt; and appoints corrupt judges to stay in power. Canadians have not ratified a constitution so the politicians do not swear in to uphold a constitution ; but insted a figurehead. You have no control over any politician, and they do not represent you in any government.

When all you loosers who think you know so much have read - Canada a country without a constitution- by Walter F. Kuhl M.P, 1935 to 1949. can disporve his findings by posting hansard; then you will be respected by me ; otherwise all you know is government propaganda as you have been well indoctrinated. It is interesting how much effort you put in to support your indoctrination; without any hansard to back up your propaganda.

As a jew you must be proud of how your people respect the right of the Palistinians to compensation for the theft of their property by the state of Israel. You have not posted any valid constitution drafted and ratified by the sovereign people of canada; becaus you have none. Their was no difference in the way Saddam ran his government than how Trudeau did ; both assumed power and did what they wanted; denial of that fact showes you are just part of the corruption like the supporters of Saddams government were.Trudeau wanted a french country to rule overas a dictator, and did everything to that end, Only government supporters who are on the gravy train do not want the fact that Canadian people did not ratify a constitution; to become well known. So transparent that the government has no ratified constitution, and they claim the queen is just a figerhead with no power; so is it the jews have the power in Canada. .

I did prove judges are corrupt =Court of Queens bench Winnipeg file no ci 05-01-43232. No mater what they read they were appointed to get the judgment the government wanted; don't let facts or evidence have any influence. Saddam got all the judgments he wanted when he was in government ; and so does the government of Canada By any and all means not only applied to raising money.

What has god got to do with it? The sovereign independent people of Canada have never drafted and ratified a constitution giving the federal government any of their powers. Trudeau acted no different than Saddam, and should of met the same justice. Since the people in a democracy is the source of all government power; and the people of Canada never ratified any constitution or amended constitution the government has no power other than assumed power like any other dictator. The politicians in Canada get their power from the queen, not the people. Slaves of the queen.

Since you know so much post the difference in the governing of the colony Canada ; and the difference of governing the sovereign provinces and the sovereign free people after the passage of the Statute of Westminster. Did all the politicians loose their power to govern or just assumed a dictatorship; and continued to govern with no mandate by the people. If you think the sovereign people of Canada created and ratified a constitution post it. Mulroney and Trudeau were both dictators; who lied to the people , trying to get the people to legalize a their dictatorship.

Its hard arguing with someone that doesn't know Canadian history i.e. The b.n.a. act is irrelevant , but thinks the failures of trudeau is more important. How about the facts; insted of your dreams.