no queenslave

It's not my problem but yours that you have been indoctrinated; and think you learned something about Canadian politics ; when all you know is government propaganda. No matter how many times you post your lies, the only one you are convincing is your other aliass I know how corrupt the system is and have proved it in a court case.

Why don't you believe democracy? or are you saying the provinces are still colonies? You prefer the war method better?

That is your best post of your understanding of Canadian politics.

reread it is not contrary".several sovereign states".

Well spoken it is confusing to you; but not to anyone who understands the difference between government propaganda and common knowledge of the facts. Now that you informed us you are incapable of understanding facts i post , go bug someone else with your ramblings.write your M.P. for better instructions.

If all laws and politicians remained the same then you are still calling Canada a colony, and their was no reason to pass the Statute of Westminster. That is right it is nonsense being a colony and independent at the same time. At least you got that right, or is it left to you.

all propaganda.Post a copy of hansard showing the vote in the house of commons which approved your goal post act of the Canadian Parliament Dec 11 1948..

Spoken like a true looser. If you have no facts on the subject why post garbage? When did Alberta get it's independence?

Read the lord nelson hotel case ; with it's water tight compartments. It all comes down to when the people were given their independence and sovereignty; and it is the Statute of westminster did that in 1931 and any BNA act or other bill is null and void. Dictators and their supporters will argue different. You can not be independent and a colony at the same time.Quit posting garbage.

to bad you did't do the same.You posted the states are in the same position- men with money run your country and you have no say and do nothing about it.

and nobody has posted any facts that dispute the fact canadians rejected the constitution twice.

When NFLD joined Canada it took a British bill; why? What stopped the union of the Turks and Caicos islands from joining Canada? Was it because of the terms of the "terms of union bill"? Was it because the parliament of the United Kingdom would not allow it ?. The government of Canada looked into this a few times and i have not seen any comprehensive reason why this union should not take place. A winter haven for Canadians instead of Florida. Too many Quebecker's in Florida? http://www.caribbeannetnews.com/2004/01/21/paridise.htm

Terms of union was a British bill by which other North American colonies could join the colony of Canada on the same terms and conditions as the original 3 colonies. The B.N.A.Act split canada into the provinces of Ontario And Quebec. Their was no need for NFLD to negotiate anything with Canada as the terms of joining Canada were set by the terms of union bill ,passed long before NFLD joining Canada.

Read the court case on the CLARITY ACT>

each were treated as colonies and it took an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom for the union to become legal; the people of Canada had no say.

Just because some sovereign country holds a referendum to join Canada , don't you think the people of Canada have a choice of allowing or not allowing that to happen? If Alberta held a referendum to join the state of Montana and signed a terms of union document would that be legal ? The terms of union bill ,act was passed by what government ---And whereas Canada has requested and consented to the enactment of an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom to...... his majesty.. What happened to the sovereignty of each as granted by the statute of Westminster and no British law applied or no law made by each is inoperative. A TOTAL MESS OF CORRUPTION.

read post 51

And what referendum was held in Canada as to weather they wanted wanted NFLD to join them? What contract was signed between Canada and NFLD?

What was the 2 dates the referendums were held on , and the vote??

The independent sovereign people did not ratify the 1982 constitution Act ; just the corrupt politicians. Quebec had a vote to separate , and it was defeated. What former colony had a petition to separatet?

" NFLD was actually it's own sovereign nation until the 1950's " And you have some documented evidence to prove that?What currency were they using in 1949? What form of government did they have? Did the sovereign people of NFLD hold a referendum in order to join Canada? SOVEREIGN. A body or state in which independent and supreme authority is vested . ( NO FOREIGN QUEEN) NFLD was a colony not a SOVEREIGN nation.

I have answered your question; you just did not understand that.

The Statute of Westminster gave the people and each province their freedom and sovereignty; in order they could form a united Country or not. You can not give people 1/2 sovereignty; no more than make a woman 1/2 pregnant; it's all or nothing. In fact every province is a sovereign province ; or still a colony of Britain. Which do you want to defend?

you have just demonstrated something else you thought you didn't need .

you couldn't afford to pay me.