Sno

Correct. Canada is a member of Nato. And Nato has obligation to act if its member is under attack. And trigger happy US chose the full blown invasion as a retribution. So we end up brigning democracy and so on. Although many questions still remain unanswered. E.g, if harbouring (not even directly sponsoring) a group that conspires and executes attacks against other countries should be equivalent to a declaration of war, maybe US itself should be invaded for all the uncounted instances when it did the same (Chile, Nicaragua ....)? Your line of thinking is quite disturbing. The 'trigger happy' US waited a month before it invaded Afghanistan after the attacks of 9/11. Another fallacy you claim is that the Taliban were not even directly sponsoring Al Qaeda. NATO leaving Afghanistan will hand the country back to the Taliban and give Al Qaeda a place to organize and carry out attacks worldwide. It's obvious.

I knew I'd find you on this thread. Hiya! Of course. If there's alien talk, I'm there.

Do you not think for one moment if the Roswell UFO incident had any legitimacy, that the U.S. military would be first to capitalize on a new form of energy if one existed? So far I have not heard of any compelling evidence and the U.S military is still using that same old expensive rocket technology. Mr. Hellyer is a outright fool for making such an absurd statement, with no proof or evidence whatsoever. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roswell_UFO_incident Maybe you'd like to comment on Area 51, where there are still signs saying trespassers could be shot. The cold war is over and this area still isn't even on US maps. Why? I've went to Area 51 about 7-8 years ago. Stayed at the Little A'Le'Inn for 5 days. There's a dirt road that leads past a farm and right up to the signs that tell you you cannot cross the line. Serious stuff.