Debo

The majority of people voted for Gore.......FYI ---------------------------------------------------------------- I dont understand the beating you people give this horse. The votes were counted and counted again and again. Sometimes they even added the absentee votes of the servicemen that the Dems had gotten thrown out. Not one time did Gore win. Also, we have been using the electoral colledge voting system forever, why is it now that you have a problem? If Gore had won then it came to light that the Dems had the absentee votes nullified, would you have called for a recount? No response needed, that is not the liberal operating method.

Surly you know that recalling a Pres is not a stipulation within the constitution. Of course the libs could always get judges to change the constitution to fit thier purpose. Again. Again. Again and oh yea, again.

I got this one. The job lost is not as bad a thing as most libs are trying to make it sound like. It is an inevitability. If it took the same number of people in 2003 to do a job as it took in 1945 then this nation would never progress and most everyone would be farmers. It is simply that we have become more efficient at our work. That has to be a good thing, right? I know it does not help the unemployed but to be fair to Bush it has nothing to do with him. And would happen regardless of who was head honcho. This is also not an American problem. Every country, even Canada, are experiencing this to one degree or another. I forget the % rate but it seems China has been hit more than the US by this.

Or Hilter, Jeffry Dahlmer, Jac Chirac, John Cretien or some smelly guy on a donkey in the mountains with a three month old grainy cassette tape of OBL. What kind of an argument is that? A rash and sentimental one. My mind is not as sharp as yours this I am sure of so when at lost for intelligent replys I simply rush to agree. Damn ,man that was dark.Smelly guy, hitler and all. It also has my mind trying to get around something that should have been obvious to me.Bad with the good. Never the less, abortion for the sake of abortion is first cowardly and mruderous. Life has been proven, at least well enough for me, to start at inseption. What is the problem, it is life, kill it and you murder.

And what do you mean by that? What I mean is that any efficient manner in which to deal with the problem will be cut short by the involvment of every bleeding heart lib in the world. They care not for remedies or reasons only mediocre nothing. That is thier way. Israel was given a state in the desert. The palestinians have been caught between Israel's expanisonist ambitions and the Arab worlds manipulations for decades. They've never had a chance. Israel cut this barren spot out of the desert with plenty of blood and sweat with no help. Also, they were working on it long before the Brits stripped the area from the Ottomans. Proof? Didn't think so. Now thats just silly. What would be one downside to this extremly intelligent proposal?

My God man. The thought ever occur to you that the life stamped out might have grown up to cure cancer or become the long awaited one? or whatever. Never know, you know?

When the anti-God crowd gets thier way and religeon is just a memory who are they going to pray to when the dogs and worms of the world open up.

Islam holds no corner on being new or different than most religeons. People believe thier religeon says what ever the man of the moment tells them it says. I have my religeon, irrelevent what it is, but I am able to hold it true not by changing it to mean what I'm told to, but by clinging to what is right and what I feel. Islam is not violent any more or less than the others. The morons listening to the bigger morons is the violent maker.

Hell, I thought it was just to make it a little less than totally unacceptable.

Pesky courts? what about human rights or maybe God or simply treating people like people.

Unfortunately the Palestinian people have become a world cause and cant be dealt with in an efficient manner.

Huh? sorry, I'm not up on as much as I would like. Maybe I will learn something.

You are so wrong. Here in the US we have that sorry NAMBLA and the ACLU teamed up, God only knows how that will turn out. But if you want to look only at the legal aspect, how fair would it be to allow gays to marry and not a farmer and his horse, or, a mother and her son, and how about those that want more than one partner, you would be eroding the safe gaurds against these things.

Maybe the Pope sees this as a human rights abuse. Think I would if I were in his position.

I cant buy into the gay gene. Really it doesnt work when put to the basic tests. If a gay gene were a legit thing how could it be passed?If you have non gay parents the gene manifesting would be doubtful. And why now, why has it grown to such alarming proportions in fairly recent times? Men and women are bio different, how could the gene rep itself the same in both. And , if it was a gene, could we not identify and gut it out?

Even worse, in America if you have a DL you have access to everything else. Kinda like a backdoor to legit.

I'm a newbie here and an American. My views on religeon differ from most but on the subject of discussion I would like these people to remember that Freedom of religeon is not the same as freedom from religeon. Which would be a scary place to live.

What then would you do. To be sure Syria and all the other terror dogs nations are niether deminished or even crippled over the loss of one training camp, but Sharone was a little smarter than you give him credit. Now Syria knows that they are not as secretive as they thought and, also Israel has shown they are willing to strike anywhere they find the necessity.