Debo

I am an American so I am definitly qualified to speak out against the slanted media. Here most of the "Main stream" media has a decidedly liberal view and go to any length to make sure the John Qs here have that same view. It has been a long time here that we have seen the big info giants reporting the news. Now we are slamed with the "correspondents" that analize the news. Throw in thier interpretation and do it in a way that makes sure it is your interpretation. We do have alternatives. Like FOX, MSNBC, internet news and lets not forget boards like this. There is a movement to clean up media here. Its just beggining and though I doubt it, Let us hope it takes on life and cans the liars.

Like every French regime before this one will take a fall and when they do quess who they will call on for help. The problem now with France is the fact that they have embedded thierselfs with the terror dogs on one side and the EU on the other. One day they may have to choose and that will be a day Chirac will certainly wish himself dead.

Both of you take a fantasy point of view to desribe what is going on. And neo con is a pathetic term used by pathetic people who have no idea of what they are actually talking about. It is, in this case, a non word such as homophobic. Sounds good but means sqaut.

How in the world can you say that Dean would make us safer than Bush? Are you drunk? No time in our history have we been safe when we did not pursue safety and peace through strength. Dean is another con artist just like the Dems dom, Clinton. He may be a little bit more moral but he is no more ethical. And allowing terror to thrive when you have the power to stop it is certainly supporting it.

Nader is insignificant I think. At least in the political arena. The same goes for Clark by hisself. Coupled with Dean he would not be insignificant. On the contrary he would be the blame for Dean losing. But I do not see that happenning simply because Clark, I think, is a Clintonian. Dean on the other hand is not. Of course I will be surprised if Clinton does not pay him a visit some night when they have time for a "talk". Cant diss the big man as Dean has. And the dems made no mistake with the recount other than be desperate and pety. The recount has been done in as much thorough a way as it could be several times now. The dems want it recounted untill they win. Aint gonna happen. Ever. Get over it.

All of my posts thus far have been actually left, but also correct. I must disagree.As Mr. Hardner implied, the more complete the picture, the better the understanding. One must NOT 'develop' a view from but one picture. There are two cameras to consider. There is you and also 'the one who is not you'. Not right ideologicaly, silly girl. Right as in correct. You must have stepped in a pile of dumb shit. Of course what you are saying is correct but in no way applies to my post as my post was a reply to a post that was as vague as my reply. Get it? You can only form a view from the picture you have. When someone says you should not form a view untill one has the whole picture. How in the hell are you supposed to know when you have the whole picture? The left doesn't want us to form a view untill we have all of the picture they intend for us to accept. God, are you being thick on purpose or does this over shoot your vision?

As in any situation you must develope your view from the picture you do have. Agree?

What has happened to our court system down here really is not so much court related as political. The liberals have found that they can circumvent the Constitution by "illegaly" passing laws that are then pushed untill accepted and intergraded into American life. I believe they to be using this path to simply do away with the Constitution. It simply stands in thier way and if they pass enough of these laws they will eventually be able to declare the use of the Constitution unconstitutional.

All you say makes perfect sense and is probaly right. I, though, have a problem with giving Gadhafi any kind of credit except that he is smart enough to stay one step ahead of the terror game. I have tried to find an angle for him to be trying and have failed. I guess it is possible that he is just scared.

None of my business, me being American and all, but things that happened that far in the past have no relevence to France/Canada today. Chirac is above all a career politician and sides with whatever view will get him to power and keep him there. If he saw no political or personel benifit to the France/Canada union it would desolve quick. A relationship that hinges on keeping a worm happy is not a substance filled relationship. France owed us, sort of, and it meant nothing to him. You say you owe them, wonder what he thinks of that?

While this may be factually true, it is also self-destructive. Human rights laws also slow down the progress of the US. Minimum wage laws, safety standards, and unions also slow down the US. ( I'll go on record as saying unions are a bad thing). I spend alot of time on this sight, most times I do not log in, just read posts. I feel compelled here to say in all your posts I have read this is the only thing you posted something even close to be right. And the funny thing is the problems you stated are the results of the unethical, immoral and moronic Libs we have down here. Kind of like you up there. NOW. The less than desirable result of the US pulling completely out of the UN is the inevitable conniving of the EU. They would definitly sieze the opportunity to take control and expand. I fully believe this to be part of thier agenda. If they do this the poorer countries will have no chance. The reason for thier establishment of the EU is totally financial. As the poorer countries are unable to meet the standards they have set: http://europa.eu.int/pol/enlarg/overview_en.htm They will inevitably be exposed to some serious political tom foolery. Also, Problem here is everytime the US tries something of this magnitude the other countries start trying to get what they can from us and it goes to crap. BUT, I am totally in favor of the US pulling out of that anti-semetic, racist, money grubbish, single sighted UN.

I do not care the reasons behind Libyas' sudden about face. Mohmar tried to have a US president killed and put contracts on the lives of said presidents children. No matter how nice he makes he knows he can never set foot out side Libya without getting a Patriot missle shoved up his ass. But, I do suspect that he is smarter than some of the other Middle East head pricks and can read the winds of change a little better. Remember, he is not a fanatical Allah fearing all hating leader. Just a terrorist.

If everyone will search thier memories they may remember back in the 50's/60's or so that Israel had totally whipped the palestinians/terrorist and the palestinians were on thier way out of country. It was Israel that screwed up and allowed them to stay. I bring this up only to point out that in no conflick, even one this sorted, can there be peace without one side or the other completely dominating the other through war. The wall is wrong but neccessary. Wrong because they should not feel like they need it. Neccessary because of the reasons righturnonred stated.

Sleep deprevation and just enough food to keep you alive, maybe playing the Jackson 5's greatest hits in the back ground is cruel but not torture. Getting your fingers cut off one knucle at a time, having a block lodged between your ankles then smashing them with a hammer are all examples of torture. The definition today of torture seems to be little more than uncomfortable. I too think the US showed pictures of Saddam simply so no one could do the accusation game later. But I'm sure our boys got a little satisfaction out of the humiliation angle and I for one do not blame them.

No greater and more graciously fair a proposal can be made than this. But I wonder should there be surgeon general warnings on condoms to this effect?

politically correct is an oxzy moron. And religion having less effect on our every day lives is probaly why there is such dark tidings in the world today. Although I fall into that catagory like most people do I dont understand the fear of religion alot of people seem to have. Are they afraid that if they see enough bibles or hear the word God enough times they will somehow be forced to believe? Bunch of non-thinkers I think.

I know I am intruding on this as I am an American,but.. I am an American Indian and although it sounds like you may have some excessive wasting of funds there it also sounds like a fair and legit type of system. Contracts made are by rights unbreakable bonds. Unless you are in US that is. Here ,if you live on a res you are casino rich on some (not mine) or patheticly broke on others. there is middle ground but not much. The US gov doesnt honor thier American Indian contracts now no more than they ever did. Inflation should apply telling you the price goes up and there it is. Tell me people, what do you think is fair? No matter your answer you can be countered with a thousand more arguements.Only one counts though, the treaty made should be the treaty kept.

I probaly should leave this alone but can not. First I dont know how you can say the Jews rule the world by proxy and then slide the US all up in there. The US are the ones directly responsible for holding the Israelies in check, binding thier hands so to speak, keeping them from effectivly fixing the murder daily problem. Second, I doubt you have convinced Krusty of your view since you give absolutly no proven connection of the things you sight and the old meany jews. Actually your post reminds me of a speech a Malaysian Prime Minister once made.

you my friend live in a dark twisted world made by you not Bush. Just as there were those that loved that pathetic Clinton (I actually voted for him the first time, to my shame)to the point that he could do no wrong, There are those that hate Bush to the point that he can not possibly do any right. That is something he can not compete against (your totally hate filled mind) and so I suspect that he does not try. Those of us that support Bush but are not repub, or old, do so with open eyes. We knowthat he is not going to get it all right but hell who does? Most of my kind do not agree with Bush. Bush agrees with us. There is a difference.

Those ignore the lessons of history are doomed to repeat it. The war on terror is not winnable. You could wipe out millions of "terrorists" but, like Hydra, more would spring up with more motivation to deal death to your innocents. The path you choose, while cloacked in noble ideas of self-defense, will only ensure the death of more innocents. If someone hits you what do you do? nothing? okay, now they just did it again. What do you do? nothing again? okay but after ten or twelve times I am sure you will have a repose. And right repose or wrong repose you will strike back with vigor equal to or greater than thier's. What would you have the US do?Why can our country have at least the same standards?

by Jim Jubak.You can read it at: http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/P62365.asp Please spare the usual left/right lecture and tell me what you think. I read the article and although I doubt not the info creditability I do thankfully come away with a bit differing opinion than the writer had. To say $36,000 jobs are being replaced with $19,000 jobs because of job created vs. job loss is giving the impression that people lose the big one today and take the little tomorrow. This of course, though possible, is not likly. In the better paid sector to many people are allowed to live on the gov for way to long for this scenario. I personally doubt that these $19000 jobs are being filled by anyone who has worked in the last several months, unless they are moving up.

I must say that is some sound logic you got going there. Even your figures seem to be right on. I checked. But now how much does your theory take into account the vast differs of the US and these other countries? Not a one of them comes close to having our population and yes the sheer size of it makes some differs. Also the death rate and mortality rate is something you did not mention. Why? Irrelevent? Seems to me that even in the worst of times for us the life expectancy rate was controlled more by social variables than by quality of health care and if that is case seems to blow your theory. Sorry. Our system is nothing less than broke. Your system is nothing more than adaquate. Lawyers are more of a problem in our health care system than any other virus could be.

I myself can not understand how Bush haters can spew thier trash and then in the same sentence say they feel he is so powerful and important that he single handedly put millions of people out of work. That mean old powerful important Bush did not even need modernation and efficientcy, didn't need Clintons drive to destruction of the economy. I bet he could have done it without the Dems convincing the illegals to accept gov money, free hospice etc..... Surly he is not as powerful as you libs think. All Hail God Bush. (just in case he is)

your statements really do not fit the topic. It seems now that people want all mention of God taken away from everywhere that a non believer might take affence. This is in no way giving anyone but the nonbeliever comfort. Can anyone disagree with the idea of freedom of religeon? But why does anyone think that this must give than the deserves of freedom from religeon. For them to ban bibles from hospitols they are catering to a small and insignificant sect of society. Doesnt matter if it is Gideon or what. A thing like this has an inerrantness to become the stepping stones of a tidal wave to strip from you your right to worship and inevitably your right not to worship. For freedom of religeon incompasses no religeon. but when things are regulated and mandated your choices soon dwindle.

If Arny could be as successful as Ronald Raegan than no greater a thing could come of this. Remember that the worms of the times hated Ronnie and thier fav monacur for him was dummie yet he outwitted every single intellectual and formatted the dismembering of the times greatest threat. Ronald Raegan was a champion of kids. He never ever had a bad thing to say to anyone. He was at times apologetic to those less fortunate than him. He believed the greatest institution the world had to offer was the love of a man and his family. I dont care what kind of filthy lib crap you have invested to your mind you cannot find fault with any of this and noone, sadly, will ever again be pres that has the morals, ethics and damn straight greatness of this man. Alot of things are debatable, this is not one. For to win you must lie. nothing new though, liberal trying to assinate someones charactor by lieing.