http://www.implosionworld.com/wtc.htm
Perhap's you should listen to what the experts have to say instead.
I've listened to quite a few experts my friend and I've learned to recognize which experts are addressing the real questions.
For instance, your experts never address the fact that no steel frame or concrete building has ever collapsed by fire or plane impact in the history of fire, buildings, airplanes, or Man. It seems to me that your experts should have addressed that if they were truly searching for truth.
For instance, here is what your experts had to say regarding comparisons to controlled implosions ..
That's just dumb .. but also very telling.
To suggest that there were only "vague" similarities to a controlled demolition is an insult to intelligence and it leaves out the most glaring aspect of the comparison .. rate of fall. ONLY a controlled demolition could have allowed the buildings .. not once, but THREE TIMES .. to collapse at free-fall speed. The ommission of this glaring fact gives away the game and should have alerted to ask the question of why they avoided it. .. I can tell you why .. because it cannot be explained according to the fairy-tale.
Additionally, your experts wasted time asking how this will effect the demolition industry .. why should it .. and spent no time asking how this affects the building and engineering industries. The events of 9/11, according to the fairy-tale, would have been the greatest failure of building engineering and structure in the history of Man, and if truly believed, would have awoken the building and engineering industries to the knowledge that relatively small fires can cause their building to melt.
Additionally, your experts failed to cite ANY scientific law or principle that support these physics and scientific anomalies that have never happened before in the history of the solar system, but somehow, magic maybe, they happened THREE TIMES ON THE VERY SAME DAY.
Perhaps you can explain it.