Okwaho

Whaaa, Whaaaa, Whaaaa!!! Who's being childish? It's a public board isn't it?

Seko Tsi, Nia wen kowa onkarasea! Onhwentiakaionhro:non ono:wen Ronon:ha' iotkenho:ron ohonhsa' Onkenonha' owen:na' ononti:io Rotinonshonni ohaha Hao ki wahi rontatatekena

I think this shows that you have never travelled. A Visa is required just to visit very many countries - not merely for residency. That list showed both the countries that required a visitor's visa and those that don't. A visa is very much related to a passport, moron, one is dependant on the other. You can't even think of applying for a visa or being visa free without a passport from a country on their list. I needed a visa when I visited the Chech repubic years ago, and I didn't establish residency there. Since your 'nation' wasn't listed in either, then from that we can presume that the Dutch do not consider your sovereign nation a nation.... Tsi... take a poll of the 200+ countries in the world... ask them which one they think is a sovereign country, Canada, or the Six Nations. I think I can tell you overwhelmingly what the response is going to be. Now I can hear your response already.... you will say that their opinions don't matter.... well the concepts of sovereignty, nationhood, etc, are all human inventions. If 99% of the humans on this planet consider Canada a sovereign nation, and .001% consider the Six Nations a sovereriegn nation, then guess which one I am sticking with????? Visas are associated with residency and are required by some countries for passage in order to deter illegal aliens which is why not all countries require one. A passport is formal indentification and is used to identify an individual as a national of a particular state or country and requests passage in and out of countries. Wakey,wakey!!!

The Royal Proclamation and Haldimand Proclamation state otherwise. Only when you misinterpret it and take its arcaic english out of context!!! Look at the Map!!! http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/related/proc63.htm

You've done no such thing. Your interpretation of the Governor General's role is so inaccurate it could almost be funny if it wasn't so lame. It is most certainly time you came into the 21st century and accepted the reality that the Governor General is the representative of the Canadian Crown - NOT the British Crown. The fact that Canada makes its own laws, has control over its own constitution, and exercises and enforces sovereignty over its lands establishes the unarguable point that Canada is a sovereign nation. Further, the fact that parts of the Canadian constitution state explicitly that Native lands are under the sovereignty of the Crown establishes the unarguable point that Native lands are not themselves sovereign states - none of them. Other pertinent and obvious examples further supports that last point. The only people going round and round are those who have no concrete evidence, and, in the face of tangible examples presented to them in support of the other side of the argument, simply state that their tales and fables prove everything else to be wrong. It's completely obvious, really, who's actually going round and round like drunken children. It's hardly my interpretation of the GGs role it your own governments interpretation!!! Media The Role of the Governor General The role of the governor general dates back nearly 400 years to 1608 when Samuel de Champlain acted as the Governor of New France, establishing what has become the oldest continuing public office in Canada. Canada became a country at Confederation in 1867. Our system of government is a parliamentary democracy and a constitutional monarchy. Queen Elizabeth II is Queen of Canada and head of State. Sworn in on September 27, 2005, the Right Honourable Michaëlle Jean, 27th governor general since Confederation, represents the Crown in Canada and carries out the duties of head of State. The governor general presides over the swearing-in of the prime minister, the Chief Justice of Canada and cabinet ministers. One of the governor general's most important responsibilities is to ensure that Canada always has a prime minister and government in place. In the case of the death of a prime minister, it is the governor general's responsibility to ensure the continuity of government. The governor general has important parliamentary responsibilities. Canada's Parliament consists of three parts: the House of Commons, the Senate and the governor general. It is the governor general who summons Parliament, sets out the government's program by reading the Speech from the Throne, and gives Royal Assent which makes Acts of Parliament law. The governor general signs official documents and meets regularly with the prime minister and government officials. She has the right to be consulted, to encourage and to warn. The governor general is Commander in Chief of the Canadian Forces. http://www.gg.ca/media/fs-fd/G1_e.asp It is quite clear that the GG gives Royal Assent to make the laws in Canada. Queen Elizabeth II is Queen of Canada and head of State and the GG represents the Crown in Canada and carries out the duties of head of State (the Queen). So...who's twisting the facts? By the way "drunken children" appears very close to making a racial Freudian slip! Tisk, tisk!!! Ciao Bambi!

Court jester? Egypt, Jordan, and Turkey quite definitely recognizes the Israeli passport. I'm pretty sure much of your list, including Morocco (link) , does as well. Ahhh! Thank-you for correcting me and proving my point that not all countries recognize/accept an Iraeli passport. Countries that do not accept Israeli passport Afghanistan, Algeria, Bangladesh, Comoros, Djibouti, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Malaysia (except with written permission from the Malaysian government), Maldives, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates (sources[citation needed] conflict over whether or not passports with Israeli stamps are accepted), and Yemen. The only non-Arab and non-Muslim country that does not accept Israel passports is North Korea.

What are you the court jester? Not every country recognizes the pass port of certain countries. For example: Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, Mauritania, Morocco, Turkey, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and North Korea do not recognize Israeli passports. Therefore by your "reasoning" Israel must not be a sovereign Nation and their passports must be bogus!!!

It has been proven to you so many times in many different ways. You really remind me of that shop keeper in the Mony Python parrot sketch. Too bad you aren't as funny. We have proven to you already that Canada is under British Sovereignty and therefore only has autonomy! The Goveror General's Role is the proof we have provided you which you conveniently deny and use the "figure head" defence. That means you are either deluded or the GG's Roles are still completely intact as the Governments website says it is! http://www.gg.ca/media/fs-fd/G1_e.asp We keep producing and yous keep denying and it's round , round you go!!!

A Visa has absolutely nothing to do with a passport you moron. A Visa is for residency in a country. A passport is to gain entry into a country.

It says prominently in your cited website that the French ceded the territories to the west of the thirteen colonies to the British at the end of the French and Indian War, but the Royal Proclamation limited the ability for the colonists to expand. It was that limitation which was partly to blame for the revolutionary war, and, as I said, once the US Americans issued their declaration of independence, the Royal Proclamation was rendered null and void within the United States, allowing the US Americans to expand westward uncontested - and slaughter a good number of Natives along the way. Compare that to the relatively peaceable westward expansion north of the border where the Royal Proclamation still applied, and still does apply today. Thus, Native lands now fall within the sovereignty of the Canadian Crown. Not unless they are ceded or surrended to the Crown!

, and in s. 2 (i) that a reserve is: So, by the very fact that the Six Nations on the Haldimand Tract receive monies from the Crown via a trust fund proves again that the territory belongs to the Canadian Crown, Six Nations are subject to Canadian laws (the Indian Act), and thus are not sovereign. This claim of Six Nations sovereignty has been going on for centuries - even just after the granting of Royal Assent to the Haldimand Proclamation in 1784, Joseph Brant asserted that the Proclamation gave Six Nations nationhood status, and full sovereignty over the Grand River lands. But, the British Government then stated clearly that that was not their intent: Later, in 1793, Lord Simcoe, Lieutenant-Governor of Upper Canada, gave Assent to the Simcoe Patent, but Brant refused to recognize its authority. 213 years after that Six Nations chiefs say the Simcoe Patent does affirm their claim to sovereignty over the Haldimand Tract! Still, neither the Haldimand Proclamation nor the Simcoe Patent does any such thing, and the claims have consistently been dismissed in court after court, all the way up to the British Privy Council when Canadians still had the ability to appeal to that body, and to the Supreme Court after that. The best part of it all is that the lands were given to the Six Nations in 1784 - prior to that the land belonged to the Mississaugas, was purchased from them by the Crown, and those Six Nations displaced from their previous lands which then lay within the United States were allowed to settle on it. The Haldimand Proclamation says as much plainly in its text: So much for your ancestral homeland, sovereignty based on self-determination, and the reliability of oral history!! And therein with all of your babled bedlam lies the first evidence of "Cultural Genocide"! The Indian Act is not even mentioned in your constitution because it is in total contradiction of our agreements that it protects! It is in fact your law breaking its own law! By the way...nice try on the Ours River quote! The name of the River refered to in the Royal Proc. is OUSE not Ours! The French named the river Grande Rivière in the 1700s and Simcoe renamed it Ouse after the Ouse river in England. Grande Rivière is still in use today under the anglicized pronounciation "Grand River." I find it quite comical that you would scoff at our oral history yet you can't understand your own written history! Then again maybe you don't want to because it reinforces our oral history! That seems to be the pattern here. We give you the evidence you ask for and you're never satisfied with it. It only goes to show...people only believe what they see but, when they see it they don't want to believe it!

Go for it!!! The question is...will you tell the true answer you recieve!

Six Nations are First Nations, are they not? I'm merely using the term First Nations in place of Indians - but I can use the latter if that's what you prefer, or is what is more accurate. Still, according to the Royal Proclamation, evidently all Native lands fall under the sovereignty of the Crown - read the quotes again, and pay attention to what is highlighted in italics. Regardless of whether or not Six Nations preceed the presence of the Crown in North America, today Six Nations are within the Crown's sovereignty, not their own. No! Indigenous lands do not fall under British Sovereignty. We've tried to explain this on numerous posts and threads. You are not reading it properly and taking most of it out of context! Here is a map that shows the land under British (east of the red line) control as opposed to "Indian Territory." As I've mentioned before, this is what ignited the American Revolutionary war. In the Proclamation the British are claiming the French controled lands as British. http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/related/proc63.htm

1) Here you go smart a$$!!! http://kahnienkehka.blogspot.com/ 2) Here's 18 of the 36 countries. Since we all haven't been to every one of the 36 I'm trying to find out who's been where and adding them to the list. Switzerland, Australia, Venezuela, Cuba, Haiti, Chile, New Zealand, Norway, Germany, Italy, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Netherlands, Belgium, Lithuania, Ireland, Dominican republic. You can pass this on to the rest of your doubters in denial although I'm sure it won't be able to pass your standards of scrutiny as nothing does! 3) The passports are issued in the name of the individual applying obviously! 4) I believe the term is political prisoners! 5) We have no control over what your government does with your tax dollars! You'll have to ask them. However, they are probably using them for the lands that were properly sold or leased. 6) The Minister of Indian Affairs is an illegal position implemented by your government in order to side step the original agreements between our Nations. Sort of like a Superior Court Judge thinking he is above the Atorney General...you know. See 9). 7) You'll have to ask your government that question as we do not have any authority over Canadas policies on their Customs agency. 8) It is the Confederacy as it always has been. In the current matter it is Chief Tekarihoka aka Allan McNaughton. 9) The Governor General as it has always been. 10) You'll have to ask them. Not all countries are represented in the UN anyway. There you have it wise guy!!! Hope it answers all your questions because this merry-go-round is getting old.

Well if you read the links 36 countries listed or not you know our passports do exist then! First of all I don't have a "Status Card" I have a Nation Card and a Rotinonshonni passport. Secondly, even an American can have the following; health card,driver's license and SIN number. I know several that do. When I lived in the U.S. after being discharged from the Army I had a S.S. number issued to me as well as obtained a California driver's license. It is all routine for residential status and has nothing to do with citizenship!