yam

Bubble boy and his merry little clones!

Says who? Anybody noteworthy? Hardly and good riddons

Oh and BTW that was Bambino not Rue, that in the post you quoted, when you freaked out. You mught want to get some glasses. oh yes I "MUGHT" do that!

There are many, many posts that contain pig ignorant opinions that are not only offensive but highly aggressive. Rue was blatently attacked by who's doing what. Rue never ever attacks anybody. Rather, is the complete opposite. I wont have it. I wont have it from you, Who's doing what or the idiot box `Argus. Dont forget your apalling ignorance is sprayed up every single post and subject matter there is here. In fact you and your crew probably repel many a thinking and critical person. This forum could be more. But it is ruled by a handful of yobo's. Dont play the innocent and go screaming to mama moderator to tell tales like a baby. You insult anybody descent here - anybody that does not agree with you and your gang.

Apparently not too dense. First off, I know well enough that the King and Queen of England live nowhere - they're all dead (there hasn't been one since the Act of Union in 1707). Secondly, they may not have lived near the lands in North America that were under the Royal Proclamation or other treaties signed with the Crown, but that doesn't negate the point that you clearly stated "the King and Queen of England never had to think about getting kicked out of their home, over a land claim." I raised the contrary point that there have indeed been "land claims" (by Spain, France, and the Netherlands) which threatened the "home" of the English Monarch. It may be slightly tangential to the conversation, but, context or not, you made an incorrect statement, and, in neither a rude or provocative manner, I pointed it out as such. Even if it did stray slightly from the point, why does it put such a bee in your bonnet? Yes, I thought you might have some decency. Your snide attitude, thrown at others for no good reason what-so-ever, demonstrates that you clearly have none. Best of luck in your future endeavours - with a "fuck you" personality like yours, I'm sure you'll need it. Notice the term land claim. As in Native land claim. If you want to backtrack and try to BS your way out of being wrong go ahead, it was good for a laugh. If you couldn't follow along that we were talking about native land claims and not European history, well, that says more about you than I could without being censored. Seeing as how you need to go back and re-read this thread so you can follow along I'll ignore your little lesson on the Royals. Do you really expect me to care whether or not I fit your idea of decency? If I have none, which you state I do not, why would I care what you think? Perhaps you should be thankful I have taken the time out of my day to respond to you? Well I guess I don't have to say anything do I? Oh ok personal opinions again. Whatever does it take to debate around here? Still im not complaining since i too am partial to personal opinions: You really are a sanctimonious piece of shite. Its laughable when hicks like you and that other idiot box Agus come crueling out of the gutter and endeavour to be "political". Your 'false class consciousness' is a thriving mass of yellow puss desperately trying to find a pore to escape from. But you wont let it since you enjoy suckling off of it too much and find it kinda tasty. Others dont however. What bothers you is that your only a couple of pay cheques away from having to return to the gutter that you came from and not only having to suckle from your wounds but also the government's welfare cheque. Alas!!! Perhaps then and only then will you ever learn to THINK. Dont forget to say hi to your buddies in the dive - you might need them, thats if they dont crush you first. You bought up Royalty. You cannot follow any argument or debate whatsoever since you get indignent when the maple leaf in you suffers exposure from others. Trouble is buddy you can never reddress can you. You and the idiot box stand naked, shrunken and shrivelled everytime you open your mouth. It an ugly truth but the truth it is. And i'm all for truth

. . . . besides the issue of racist bias in who you want to participate in these threads, or rather who you dont you never answered the question: A question that any self reflecting human being would ask. It would be expected in a university and it would be expected to be debated. Afterall, it was the twin towers that were targeted. Now why do you THINK that was? The question asked by Tsi was extremely pertinent and to the point. However: You simply dont like it that a "native" asked it. You dont like it when they are smarter than you - do you. SO What about all the victims of poverty that have died due to US imposed corporations? Why are they not remembered and listed? Look at how soldiers are treated as pensioners for a start. Is that respect? At most they might get a tin medal that cost less than $1.00 to make in some swet shop in Taiwan. Look at how the soldiers were treated in the Vietnam war. They were experimented upon with drugs/steroids etc to 'improve' there combative techniques!! They were treated like rats and rabbits that are experimented upon for the use of makeup and you talk of respect!! Your sort can be bought so easily - two a penny - look at your minimum wage for a clue

I understand this sentiment. You come from a failed, conquered people who never amounted to anything. So I understand how you would sympathise with the failed peoples of third world nations who have produced corrupt cultures and corrupt, brutal governments which have little interest in protecting or caring for them. But that is not the fault of the secretaries, the security guards, the restaurant staff, or, for that matter, the stock brokers, insurance executives or airline passengers who were murdered on 911. I think some of them, from the stories, were heroic, particularly the police and fire fighters who rushed into the building. But that's as may be. There was no rebellion, just the whiny, self-serving outrage of religious wackos from a death cult who come from a failed culture. Again, I understand your sympathy for them. Well, if we practiced war like north american natives used to, then yes, there would be no such war since we would have committed genocide on our neighbours the first time we beat them - and possibly eaten them, as well. So yes, then there would be no war. Is Did i really read the above? You are the most racist bunch of eneducated people there is. I promisre you this Oh Canada . . . . I am going to sell you as the most racist first world country there is! You are ALL like that imbecile that called himself SS Actually ARGUS you would not be able to type in messages from where i come from now. Where i come from freedom of speech and opinion is first class . . .Those that are assimulated are abandoned by those that are not. . . . .Your lot would be completely abandoned. Back water hicks - - no sophitication whatsoever . . . .Im a woman that could never, never, never . . . .ever . . . Ohhh a neanderthol . . . . . .No effing way! . . . . dirty murderous muck . . . . I used to think evoluion had its limits . . . . revolting you are

Metaphorically speaking, its rather like battered woman syndrome. We vote them in, get abused and vote in another who is exactly the same and so the cycle of life goes on. being battered is deemed powerful by the abuser and the abused.

What exactly is the thread title tryng to ask? Throw it out where? When actually is the correct time to do this? And what for? it seems that we have not really broached the case at hand yet.

No.

yes, you need to site who and what company sponsored the research . Im not saying this to be akward but sponsors of scietific research often clash due to the sponsors longer and larger interests. You did say that the rain forest was a "net contributor to greenhouse gases by a small ammount" - im not sure what you are trying to tell us here. . . .concerning quantities?

Iv forgotten why - strategic/geographical??

I suppose so. As long as our differences can honestly be spoken about and not held against us which hinders advanced motion. Afterall, major differences have been colonially imposed. Previous to divide and conquer difference was accepted as simply difference. . . .under creation from all corners as it were!

That was silly. You have just listed to the forum 21 different social movements. You need 21 different explanations. I did a thesis on the shining path which ran into a few of what you listed. Even so, it was fairly unique though responding to similar conditions from about half of what you have listed. Anyway in making the list of these diverse social movements what was your specific point (no im not being sarcastic)?

terrorist according to whom, where and what. . . . dominant forms of understanding history. All very important questions what! A list does not cut it.

Exactly what "scarce resource" did Afghanistan have that we need to "maintain our lifestyle"? I never said that per se. What i said was that IT is the ticket to give liscence to North American and Western domination. In fact it is possible to see a huge profit arising from this (yes Sept 11th) in less than 15 years time. Lets start the count down and see! No harm in a little bit of homework. I hope that i am wrong.

I dont think that necessarily because canadian and US soldiers are fighting the 'alleged' war on terror it is to simply protect our 'life style'. Rather, it is to MAINTAIN our lifestyle as 'leading'core countries into the future when resources get scarce due to growing demand. More so however, it is to broaden and strengthen the core countries ability through military might to shape these peripheral countries for their use, but far more so in and for the upper echelons of core societies as opposed to a concern with the core countries masses -us (other than to maintain contentment).

I ridicule all faiths. I find all are tailor made to control the weak minded, the scared and the ignorant masses. How much blood has been shed in the name of your god Rueful one? OMG - we have found one commonality/opinion that we share. And you managed to remember to type it out - in two sentences You that hates the role of memory. . . .congratulations! one step at a time! However, neither you or I know if Rue is religous. Somehow i doubt it.

Now this is precisely why you cannot come to grips with oral history. You cannot even read beyond a sentence. Mentally challenged is the correct PC term for what you as a society breed and hold dear. However, what is more alarming is that this same 'brand' of 'folk' run the legal and penal system that is expected to be the ultimate voice of wisdom ___________________________________________________________ The et al's Lets be honest here even though the truth is something many would not like to hear out of a sense of false pride. Tsi is knowledgable concerning all native issues. He is also creative and funny. Tsi also shares if you bothered to listen and has the patience of a saint - no kidding!! Is he a supremicist? No he is not. Is he proud of his culture as a Mohawk? YES he is. The amazing thing is that none of you have ever checked out WHY. Surely you would have thought he defies all the stereotypes of 'natives' that you like to believe? perhaps thats the problem - for you He has got every reason to be proud. The kids are brought up to think and be creative simultaneously. That is, even though canadian society demands kids learn to be a parrot and worse. The way the mohawk structure is organised is highly accountable to ALL those living in it. That is not to say that it is perfect. So in knowing about the pitfalls of corruption etc that every society suffers in the world the Mohawk culture does its best to watch out for it. I think you would be amazed if he told you HOW. But you more than likely wont even bother to hear him out. A pity really because you might just get a glimmer into the reason why the government seeks NOT to let them have their land. It is a whole different ball game at issue here. I think you are muddling what is pride (since many non natives dont have it unless its false pride) with supremicist. in speaking for the Mohawk nation Tsi is outrightly proud - yes. Whats wrong with that? You and I are brought up to have false modesty as pride. . . .at most. Its ridiculous. At least he's honest about himself But in the end canadians will never know this due to their suffering from their sad societal malady. A total and complete lack of concerntration. That is why the government finds them an easy pushover - Exactly the same as Bush and Blair does with their societies.

Hey Kid. I would not brag about that if i was you. It shows just how ASSIMILATED YOU ARE. So much for freedom of thought and expression on your side. You dont have any. Keep kissing the preachers a$$ . . . the church and state. Its your only source of identity - a moron that worships morons.

Because your attitude is paticularly canadian. It still uses the language and belief system of its conquerers. Canada has not got over them yet. That is concerning racism - anti-natives, anti-abortion issues, sexism and more. You stand out in the international arena for this. You ask can we use the term prejudice to make it more PC. Yet you ask that with a name like Squaw Shagger. its very sad and extremely ignorant anywhere else in the world you would be embarrassed at your own stupidity. How many years is it going to take to get over your oppression as feeling superior to all else when all else is laughing at you?

No, it's a dumb thesis. Oh, you can certainly make a case that when Muslim wackos are pointing at how evil western society is the things liberals love make up the leading edge of the "evil" they see here. But those Saudi loonies didn't fly airplanes into the WTC because they hated the thought of gay men holding hands in New York. Vallium anybody?

Sooooooo typical. You boring little asshole.

i suppose you are the same . . .but just in case not 'who is doing what' to be more precise. This is the first time iv ever had a prob with names. The reason is because you are all ther same = christian rednecks!

Yes you archaic bastids. You are and do practise cannabalism. You drink the wine believing it is blood, you eat the bread believing it is flesh. You stink believing it is holiness. You are revolting and living in the fourteenth century - grow up! The 21st century awaits you idiots. Waiting & watching you are a redneck. You cannot spell or write a sentence. If i were you id hide in shame never mind attacking anybody - you have to be worth something to do that. Go and join the sad sheep shagger . . .he may be able to teach you how to seduce a chicken.