BubberMiley
-
Posts
11,324 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
19
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by BubberMiley
-
-
Just now, Zeitgeist said:
Are you an anonymous halfwit calling for an insurrection against the people of Canada? Don’t worry, your rights are protected… Lol
I have a feeling you don't know what "insurrection " means.
-
4 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:
bald faced lying ad hominem spewing sock puppet trumpeting government propaganda / shrugs
Which part is the lie?
-
1 minute ago, Dougie93 said:
until they get thrown under the bus next
it used to be that the truckers would have called me crazy
Given that 90% of truckers are vaccinated and working, they're still calling you that. Cutting off supply lines is particularly crazy.
-
Just now, Dougie93 said:
simply an analysis, I didn't advocate for anything, try again
Wow. Are all of you such cowards that you can't own up to what you are clearly saying? Do you think you're fooling anyone?
-
1 hour ago, Dougie93 said:
never mind your delusions about democracy
that's over now
this is naked force now
all that matters now is who has more soldiers
that's why the government is panicking
-
5 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:
neither do I
Uh...you know we can still read your earlier posts, don't you?
-
3 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:
doesn't matter, the law requires all that to happen before the Mounties are sent in
the crime is already committed, simply by acting without the mandate of Parliament
Uh ..no. The government has the authority to use the act. The debate today in the House is just to confirm the democratic will to do so.
But calling for violent insurrection is a crime. Even for anonymous halfwits on an obscure internet forum.
-
Just now, Dougie93 said:
so says an ad hominem spewing internet sock puppet trumpeting propaganda for Trudeau /shrugs
At least I don't support violent insurrections and then whine about being insulted for it.
-
1 minute ago, Dougie93 said:
the attack has already gone down
they launched attack while Parliament was suspended, very deliberately
That would make sense if the vote today was against the use of the act. Let's see if your theory holds weight once the votes are counted.
-
1 minute ago, Dougie93 said:
they have falsely invoked the Emergencies Act
the act is for the most extreme circumstances, like World War Two level of emergency
Blocking supply lines is extreme. They lost the right to claim they were peaceful protesters as soon as they did that.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:
meanwhile the Act has not even passed in Parliament
Then it's a bill and not an act? ...or you have no clue how parliamentary democracy works?
They are debating the use of the act in Parliament today, not its existence. If its use is rejected in our parliamentary democracy, they'll scrap it. But a vast majority of Parliament is expected to support its continued implementation.
This is how a parliamentary democracy works.
-
6 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:
I am simply extrapolating by the historical record
that when countries crush peaceful protestors petitioning the government in the streets
so desperate that they cannot be intimidated and must be crushed under jackboots
that is the stuff that violent civil disorder is made of
this is the kind of draconian government that incites civil war
There is nothing peaceful about attempting to block supply lines. And the only example of someone being "crushed" was a lie from your Putin-worshiping overlords.
-
5 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:
says who ?
You just did. You are rejecting parliamentary democracy and advocating violently overthrowing it.
Although it's not unusual for you cowards to then immediately deny you said what you just said.
-
-
6 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:
Wow you’re clueless. Dougie has spent the last few weeks showing how our rights are being violated. The foreign power takeover is being actively supported by our Liberal government against Canadian sovereignty. Schwab has penetrated the Cabinet and Trudeau is celebrated by Schwab as a true believer.
You would believe anything so long as it is delivered in a Facebook meme.
-
27 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:
none of them are combatant
they are bourgeois office workers, bureaucrats, college professors and students
the martial class, the men who will kill & die for their cause, are against the government
You're a violent, insurrectionist extremist and an enemy to your own country.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:
neither am I, neither are any of my brothers
we are the loyalists to the Queen, not the Liberal Party of Canada
we have all taken solemn oaths to defend & uphold the freedom of Canadians
this is our religion
the opinions of civilians are not going to stop us from doing our duty to Her Majesty
Canada is not a republic, we don't answer to the public
You sure sound like one. We are a constitutional democracy. The PM doesn't even have a majority. He is subject to the will of the House of Commons. Anyone undermining that system is a traitor and should be dealt with as such.
Fortunately you are a tiny, practically illiterate bunch who don't even really know what you want. Unfortunately you are easily manipulated by foreign actors who want to destroy our country.
-
2 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:
the RCMP is tiny, the serving military is tiny
veterans in the country outnumber them ten to one
They aren't all psychopathic losers though.
-
Blocking supply lines is not peaceful protest. It's an act of terrorism.
-
4 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:
the martial class, the men who will kill & die for their cause, are against the government
Yes, you have the chronically victimized psychos, but the RCMP your far-right militia were planning to assassinate might not be onboard.
-
32 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:
feels like the brink of civil war
...where the vast majority of the country is against you.
-
19 minutes ago, Nationalist said:
Says the guy who has no idea what a conservative mind would think...
Do you think real conservatives view blocking supply lines as an acceptable form of protest?
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:
The part about assembly and protest, for one.
They were allowed to assemble and protest. They just weren't allowed to terrorize and block supply lines.
-
On 2/17/2022 at 2:58 PM, Goddess said:
Very disingenuous.
The Charter defines our rights. It is the government that is changing the Charter to suit themselves.
The rest of your post is just.....silliness.
Try to add some adult thoughts next time.
What part of the charter was changed? I realize such questions can be difficult to answer, but I'm curious what you're referring to.
Trucker's Convoy
in Federal Politics in Canada
Posted
Yes, I asked because I knew you had nothing.