GroundskeeperWillie

Can you explain this? "myocarditis risks are higher for the unvaccinated than the vaccinated". Do covid shots provide protection against myocarditis?

Lol you honestly thought I was asking you to provide evidence. How clueless can you be? Hint to you: I wasn't. I was trying to make you see the futility of it. I wanted to make you realize you were merely opining. But you actually went and searched and produced evidence, which tells me you thought that opinions could be proven. Sad, lol.

They do this in the name of "levelling the playing field", they say that they are recruiting from "under-represented" communities. The reality is that, if they consider competence as the sole criterion, then the vast majority of qualified applicants will be white males, because this group of people happens to be the most competent, compared to all the others. And of course, the Powers that be hates this fact.

I see. And agreed.

I don't see anything wrong with what CdnFox says. I have read several of his posts and they are all very reasonable and on point.

CdnFox is on your ignore list? Lol he must have really hurt your feelings.

You cry when you are bored? Lol you weirdo. Nope.

I didn't say or imply that. I don't understand all these tears of yours.

If you talk like a preschooler, I will respond using preschooler mechanisms. It's the only language you understand. Nope. You still don't get it. I have no use for your precious evidence because "Druthers is garbage" is a mere opinion. As such, it cannot be proven in any way. Again and again you show your ignorance out on the open board for all to see. Why do you punish yourself like this?

Or how about he gets neither? I think 0 % chance of myocarditis is better, right? This implies that vaccines can lower the risk of myocarditis. Didn't know your precious vaccines were such panacea.

His post is relevant to the quote he is responding to.

If things continue this way, I really think soon it will be a hate crime if a man is not willing to date a trans-woman.

Nope. It's because I don't have any opinion about that one article. I do take notice that you try very hard to "prove" Druthers is conspiracy garbage. Are you secretly afraid that Druthers might be right?

I think you just described yourself. Why do you care about me so much? That's because responding to you bumps my thread, lol.

I see, so you are just here to spew your opinion and call other people's source "conspiracy theory". I acknowledge that that's one way to spend one's time. My "argument"? You think I am arguing with you? Please. All I want to do is spread awareness about the issues raised in my article. Proving your opinion to be worthless is very low on my list of priorities.

They changed the definition of vaccine so that the covid shots would now be called vaccine. Under the old, more scientifically rigorous definition, covid shots would not have qualified as such. Maybe to call them liar is too strong a word. But they used dirty tricks such as changing the definition. I find this very morally problematic and this is why I don't trust the authorities. And further, like CdnFox said, you called it "hooey". You should back this up.

If the covid shots aren't vaccines yet the authorities lied to you and told you they were, then you should really start to question their integrity. Can you prove that it's hooey? Are you sure this isn't just an opinion?

Except you haven't established that calling Druthers conspiracy garbage is factual. Hint to you: it isn't. Calling something garbage...etc is an opinion, not a fact. I am starting to think you have trouble telling your personal opinion from facts. Thank you for the support, Often.

So basically, Druthers is conspiracy garbage because they post conspiracy garbage. Do you know what circular reasoning is, sir?

Are you conceding that covid "vaccines" aren't real vaccines? Further, if the authorities lied about covid shots being real vaccines, why should we believe anything else they say?

I didn't ask you to disprove anything. I asked you to prove Druthers is conspiracy garbage because that is what you literally claimed. And if you claim something, then it's on you to prove it. I see that you are quietly backing out of this thread because you are unable to back up your bogus claim.

You are wrong, sir. If you make a claim, which you did, you need to prove it. For you to act like I am being unreasonable just tells me that you got nothing. You can't prove your bogus claim that those articles are conspiracy theories so you cry that I am asking you to do the impossible.

Then you need to prove they are conspiracy theories. And no, "because I don't believe them" is not proving.

But all you did is tell me how you don't trust the paper. You haven't proven how it's a clownpaper or conspiracy garbage.

Prove that it's a conspiracy clownpaper. If you think the paper is such garbage, why don't you prove it? You seem to know so much. Also, "I will not get any serious traction"??? Oh no, some nobody on the internet does not take my thread seriously! Whatever will I do? Whether I will put Michael on ignore isn't any of your business. You just have a problem with me because I had the audacity to quote a source that you hate. Now get lost.