robosmith

No, just when she's wearing them. Why do you ask? Need some tips to spice up the bedroom? LMAO

And we know you're just an ahole spewing BULLSHIT. I said you're perfectly free to post YOUR OPINION, but you CROSSED the LINE when you CLAIMED it was "FACT." Try to keep up, ldiot.

No, but I am curious as to why his wife is wearing HIS panties. I don't even own "panties." LMAO Unless tidy whities or equivalent colors qualify. I generally think "panties" are made with skimpier fabrics.

NO ONE said it was REQUIRED. I own them BEFORE I give them. Afterwards they are NO LONGER MINE.

Not ONLY a lifetime of PERSONAL experience observing and THINKING, but ALSO READING and LISTENING to what EXPERTS have to say. One observation is that conservatives have a very simple minded way of believing ONLY the MOST OBVIOUS interpretation of phrases.

^Fool's errand.

You didn't say trans make shitty spokesmen, you said they shouldn't be visible in public. AKA, in the spotlight.

Yes, he COULD buy panties for his wife AND retain ownership, IF she was his slave. REAL men give their wife ownership of a GIFT. HIS statement is AMBIGUOUS. Mine chose one of the OBVIOUS meanings. Back atcha.

It's OK that your wife wears YOUR panties. Just not at the same time as you. LMAO

YOU OBJECTED to a trans being put in the spotlight. AKA, they should stay in the closet. Next time say what you MEAN.

You're the one who said your wife is wearing YOUR panties. LMAO Next time say what you MEAN.

Has nothing to do with the crime rate in NY. All about tarring Bragg to (try to) help Trump. ?

So they're OK with you as long as they remain in the closet. Too bad it sucks to be you. ?

So either you or your wife is a cross dresser. Congrats on being woke.

Trans and homo phobes are generally UNAWARE of their fears (AKA subliminal), which generally refers to THEM BECOMING trans of homo, not physical fear of the person. The fear is of the INFLUENCE of NORMALIZATION. You're welcome.

Rhetorically, sealioning fuses persistent questioning—often about basic information, information easily found elsewhere, or unrelated or tangential points—with a loudly-insisted-upon commitment to reasonable debate. It disguises itself as a sincere attempt to learn and communicate. Sealioning thus works both to exhaust a target's patience, attention, and communicative effort, and to portray the target as unreasonable. While the questions of the "sea lion" may seem innocent, they're intended maliciously and have harmful consequences. — Amy Johnson, Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society (May 2019)[6] Sorry kiddo - YOU"RE wrong, And i just proved it If you disagree then you have to provide the proof. Gotcha Nope. I POSTED EVIDENCE that mental evaluation IS SOP. You have posted NOTHING which contradicts that. If your EVIDENCE is "easily found" then POST IT.

You ARE WRONG until you PROVE you're right. Your OPINIONS are NEITHER wrong nor right, just OPINIONS. YOU are DISMISSED.

What sucks is YOU cannot corroborate YOUR OPINION with EVIDENCE. ANYONE can CLAIM their OPINION is FACT, but that does not make it true. It means you're COMPLETELY IGNORANT about DEBATE RULES.

No reason to believe ^this OPINION.

No, you're completely free to post ONLY YOUR OPINION. But there is no reason for me to confirm what YOU CANNOT.

^NOT EVEN CLOSE to the TRUTH. Apparently you don't know what persuasion is. LMAO

Until you post evidence HERE (like I HAVE), it is ONLY your OPINION.

Seems like it is entirely unethical to proceed with any significant elective surgery without mental evaluation. As confirmed by the policy at Johns Hopkins.

Only seeks to PERSUADE action, NOT FORCE IT.

So ^this is ONLY YOUR OPINION since you have NO evidence.