Robert Greene

I'm what most people would call an extreme fiscal conservative. Extreme because I believe no government has the right to spend any money it doesn't have in times of peace. I think deficit financing is inter-generational theft. I believe the conventional practice of Keynesian economics has failed. I think we need a balance budget amendment to the constitution, plus requiring all forms of government, Federal, Provincial, or Local, to pay off at least 1% of the outstanding debt per year.I think if we continue to give the government the power to spend money it doesn't have than there's always going to be abuse. I also think the courts should have the power to veto all requests for unnecessary spending.Governments should be required to cut all unnecessary spending until tax revenue exceed spending.I think we need to redesign the social safety to improve access to jobs and pressure companies to hire the disabled, instead of overusing welfare checks.I was a liberal until I realized Obama was running a Trillion dollar deficit. I got so angry, I started listening to conservatives, since they seemed to be the only ones realizing that money doesn't grow on trees. I'm still socially progressive on helping the poor and disabled, but I'm liberal in the sense, we should make sure companies follow the law, pay a decent wage for the work done, and provide safe working conditions. I believe in pragmatic liberalism that doesn't undermine our values, traditions, or undermine the integrity of economy.Environmentalists believe in protecting the planet for future generations, and conservatives believe in protecting the treasury for future generations.The government should have an elite accounting branch, that can help them recognize wasteful spending.I believe when there is a problem, the court system should force us to redesign programs to work more efficiently, not increase the budget out of convince. You either eliminate wasteful programs or reform to be fiscally responsible.

Liberals don't think Toronto is overcrowded. They think we need to catch up to New York.

One of the biggest reasons the worlds screwed up right now, is because of neglect. We don't face a problem head on. We just think "out of sight", "out of mind". Well these native communities are out of sight. We have neglected them for too long. We have the ability to significantly improves their lives, but we don't. If a little force gets people off their ass, and working towards fixing the problem, than i'm all for it. Many times force is overused, but in this particular instance, we need some force, or thing are going to fall apart. If I was Canadian Minster, I would increase access to opportunity by force, while decreasing the reliance on welfare. We need to redesign the social safety net, put more responsibility on cooperation to improve access to jobs, and less burden on the taxpayer for bailing out the unemployed. I'm not afraid of a little force, as long as their are checks and balances, and the right people making decisions.

Many advocates of depopulation have promoted abortions. The say that religious institutions are biased and are trying to control your life. While contraceptives are perfectly ok, Abortion is not ok. Abortion is murder. As soon as fertilization takes place, you're killing another human being. Any policy towards depopulation is going to have to have checks and balances protecting the dignity of human life, and the right of anyone to become a parent. Just because it's legal, doesn't mean abortion is not a murder. We live in a society telling mothers it's ok to kill your own baby. These are the facts. If you disagree, watch this video, and explain why you disagree. Religious establishments need to realize that Increasing the use of contraceptives will decrease the demand for abortions, weather legal in some places or not. Getting vasectomies will reduce the demand for abortions. When the church blocks access to contraceptives, they increase the demand for abortions. They can't have it both ways.

I'm against hyper-urbanization. Where people value only living in the most crowded spaces. We have lost interest in living in small towns, and smaller cities. The immigrants come from overpopulated countries, so to them moving to Toronto feels like downsizing. I don't think Canada has an immediate overpopulation problem, except for in the large cities. Right now we're poised for a housing crash, just like what happened in 2008. We have unregulated real-estate speculation going on, creating a bubble, while young people can't afford to buy a home. I think quality of life diminishes, when cities become overcrowded. Before Canada starts to decline in population, we should divert the marjory of new immigration to places than can benefit from population growth. Yes it's going to displace white people in small towns, but that's going to be the cost of fixing the issues in Toronto, Montreal, and Vancouver. As I told you before, my priority is not the protection of white people. Regardless of what ethnicity lives where, the first priority of ethical depopulation should be to reduce growth in cities, and at some point reduce growth in large towns. The only places that should allow new growth is the smaller towns, that need the population growth. I would develop a plan to gradually reduce immigration levels over the next 5 years to the point that immigration doesn't add to the population. During that time I would only allow grow in Smaller Cities, and Rural areas. I would also require new subdivisions to have at least 25% parks or woodlots within 500 feet of any house. So every 10 houses down the street, there is 3 empty lots than can be a small playground, garden, or woodlot. Ethical depopulation is going to have to be a transition. The first phase will begin with curbing population growth. You can't do it abruptly, or would be too much of a shock to the system. During the same time, I would gradually reduce the workweek down to 32 hours over 5 days, and then suddenly change it to 4 days, while extending mandatory vacation time up to 5 weeks. I would declare that humans should make freetime a priority again. You work to live, you don't live to be working all the time. Humans will appreciate more freetime, as opportunities to connect with nature opens up, during the depopulation. We then have to figure out how fast can the world depopulate without causing an economy recession. Can we design a controlled collapse in population, while increasing the GDP per capita? I think it would take at least 200 years to get bellow a billion. In a scenario like this Canada might reduce it's population by 50% percent, while India Reduces it's population by 90% The goal is to aggressively, but ethically depopulate overpopulated Countries and Cities faster than anywhere else. If I was running Canada right now, I would impose an immediate 30% cut in immigration, followed by a 5% cut each year until we're under the rate of replacement.

Seems like they are making some progress in Egypt, but the Islamic religion is against artificial contraception. https://www.madamasr.com/en/2017/05/07/feature/politics/overpopulation-religion-and-fatwas-on-demand-in-egypt

You might not agree with my methods, that fine. It takes a while to figure out what solutions work best. Perhaps we can have a public relations campaign about the need to curb population growth in North American Cities. At least increase population in underpopulated areas. We should ban immigration to the largest cities, and have people move to places like Saskatchewan, that could benefit from an increased population. Canada has room to create new cities instead.For those who think I'm against human rights, I don't consider abortion a viable option to reduce population. As a conservative, I think abortion is murder. I'm totally ok with contraception and volunteered vasectomies. I won't support abortion as a convenient form of ethical depopulation.

We're stuck inside our homes miserable, not going out to public events, doing things with the community. We become anti-social.

First chapter of my book is going to be on why i'm a conservative, and why the conservative way of life can be compatible with environmentalism. There is a lot of passionate gasoline out there, you just have to give them the right spark. People care, they just don't know how to turn ideas into action. We're going to retrofit cities to look gorgeous with nature. One empty lot at a time. We're going to get the empty space beside soccer fields into botanical gardens.

You give the information to those who do care, you play one side off against the other, until the issue is amplied. I think its easier to get wide-scale vasectomies going, than trying to put oil companies out of business. Activism can be like distilling alcohol. You have to keep redistilling things until it's purified. Will make the information so powerful, it will hit everyone like a tone of bricks. Not impossible to convince people not to have 5 children. It will be harder to stop the establishment from panicking once the numbers start going down.

Environmentalism is very hard. You don't get a personal life. Very few people get it. I feel I have a responsibility because I can pick up on things others can't see. I did 4 years in university. We all talked about Climate Change, and blaming Bush. I only see one solution. We got to get our numbers down. We can't change the system, but we can shrink it. I'm going to write a book and advocate for a documentary to be made advocating for ethical intervention on overpopulation. Some of my ideas like forced vasectomies were wrong. Will get a wide-scale volunteer program going on. Environmentalist have put all their eggs into one basket. Trying to change the system, well that has failed. Preventing population growth, could be the greatest missed opportunity we're not talking. The only way individuals can use resources without guilt is to lower our numbers. I don't want a future where the World's resources are rationed. I wan't people to live the good life, but not in massive cities. It's going to have to be small cities, and a different way of life, with more freetime. We can start the decline now, or wait for nature to kill us off. I was just on a dating site, trying to enjoy my life, and i'm not going to waste time with women, and unnecessary distractions. I need to focus and get this done.

Blacks are now free, and have the opportunity to make a difference.

Slavery is evil, and black people can help by reminding the world about the dangers of slavery in modern times. Blacks could go on CNN and be like, hey these people are the new slaves. What are you going to do. In about a years time, their lives would improve.

Picking cotton was easier than some of the jobs they're made to do. I think slavery has gotten worse. I don't see black people boycotting walmart. I guess black people are the new whites, not caring about who makes their stuff. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3339578/Crammed-squalid-factories-produce-clothes-West-just-20p-day-children-forced-work-horrific-unregulated-workshops-Bangladesh.html

We still have slavery. You support it when you buy a shirt from walmart. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/05/world/asia/bangladesh-takes-step-toward-raising-38-a-month-minimum-wage.html

We can't become the society of anything goes. We should respect our traditions a bit more. Too many people are trying to go along to get along. We use to have backbone. Now we're a bunch of cowards.

I'll say i'm wrong for saying it doesn't matter if whites go extinct as long as the planet survives. You have the right priorities. I made a mistake.

Our ancestors were smarter. 30 or 40 years ago, he would of been thrown in Jail. It sets a dangerous precedent. The only hope for the world, is a conservative revolution.

Logically you should be able to masturbate on a park bench because it feels good. As long as you don't touch anyone, you shouldn't be discriminated against because someone happens to see your penis hanging out. You could argue it doesn't harm anyone, if they only happen to see it. The only harm is being done on you, because someone is judging you for it. The person that yells at you to stop masturbating, is doing a hate crime, because of their aggression. The solution is to have well-defined checks and balances, not unlimited protection for sexual equality under the charter.

Would you vote to make it legal?

It's only a matter of time before political correctness can't defend against incest and pedophilia.

I'm a different kind of conservative. I'm against deficit financing and government waste. I don't need to lick the boots of large corporations. They can step up to the plate. I'm the kind of conservative that cares about small businesses and the middle class. The policy towards the natives is failing. We don't give them job access, we give them welfare checks, transfer payments, and grants. Our model is lets just throw money at everything instead of trying to fix the problem. We think we should mind our own business, and do nothing, instead of debating what kind of intervention can work. I say open a call center in Iqaluit. Call me a socialist, I just saved you a lot of your tax dollars. Handing over a welfare check instead of a job is rewarding mediocrity. You need the right kind regulation and government intervention. You just figure out what policies are better then others. The job quota system does less harm than the welfare check. The natives that show up to work drunk can get fired, the ones that say thank you and work hard, should have the right to keep their jobs.

Here's a picture on the United Kingdom the only critical mass "Hanging By a Thread" is the small remaining forest, you see in the dark green. Biodiversity requires critical mass in habitat size or the species can go extinct. We're humans meant to wipe out 87% of the landscape? These are the warning signs. The Amazon is next, if we don't get our act together. If the solution is to do everything we can, to ethical prevent someone from having a 3rd child, than so be it.

The guy is telling some lies. Start at 6:30 and listen for a bit. In the video hes says' "If there were half as many people, none of these things would exist" Wrong. If there was half as many people we would still have Chamber Music, Parasailing, Ethiopian Restaurants, and lecture halls. Maybe not as many to choose from, but they would still exist. He's lying when he says critical mass is "hanging by a thread". Critical mass might be hanging from a thread for the space program, and 100 foot high skyscrapers, but I can assure you can find Sushi restaurants even in the smallest towns in Canada. He talks about innovation. Well if we have less people on the planet, the rate of technological growth would slow down, but it would be a good thing, because it took the planet millions of years to evolve. Things in the natural world happen at a slower place. This is how things remain stable. Technological change is happening too fast. It takes multiple generations to appreciate the costs and benefits of a new technology. We would half to be more patient for technological change, but it would give us more time to make the right decisions. We need to slow it down, and not be working 9 to 5, spending up to 3 hours in traffic, killing ourselves to compete. Ancient cultures didn't do 9 to 5. We're becoming slaves in our own prison. We should be competitive and work hard, but work less hours. Were building a mental prison for future generations. We need to retake our humanity, and fight for the things that make sense. We're working 50 out of 52 weeks of the year, because the elite want us occupied. 50 weeks is not the critical mass needed to keep a country from going bankrupt. It's the skewed equilibrium we set with our dumb policies. We need to ask ourselves, if we want room to breath, or should we push everything to the breaking point?

I am white, and white lives are important. I don't have the answer for keeping the white race alive. I think natural selection is replacing us. I won't go as far as Eugenics to keep the white race alive. If we mix eugenics with population policy, the intentional system will stop the movement dead in its tracks. My proposals will do far more to help white people, than nothing at all. It would force countries that have a higher population density to depopulate faster. The majority of overpopulated countries happen to be non-white. All races including the white race have to make sacrifices, otherwise it will be seen as racist. If we put "save the white race" on the label, it's bound to fail. There are too many non-whites in Canada to save the white race. We're not going to go extinct, we're going to become the minority. You should use your energy to fight for a better cause. I respect you for caring about white people, I just can't come up with a policy to reverse Canada into a white majority country again. We can't go to China, and be like you guys need to depopulate, so the white people have more influence in the world. The language you use is important.