Dissenter

Asian countries for Asians. African countries for Africans. White countries for everybody! It is said that there is this RACE problem. It is said that this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries. The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of people from the third world and "assimilating" with them. It is said that the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites. What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries? How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem, but rather the final solution to the BLACK problem? How long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this? But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I'm a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews. They say they are anti-racist, but they're really anti-white. Anti-racist is just a code word for anti-white.

Asian countries for Asians. African countries for Africans. White countries for everybody! It is said that there is this RACE problem. It is said that this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries. The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of people from the third world and "assimilating" with them. It is said that the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites. What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries? How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem, but rather the final solution to the BLACK problem? How long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this? But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I'm a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews. They say they are anti-racist, but they're really anti-white. Anti-racist is just a code word for anti-white.

Canada is not a prostitute. Asian countries for Asians. African countries for Africans. White countries for everybody! It's genocide.

You had to do editing to come up with that? Thnx for proving the point: Anti-racist is just code for anti-White.

Nobody says that Black or Asian countries have a problem with "racism" because they're predominantly Black or Asian. Nobody DEMANDS that all Black countries - and ONLY Black countries - or all Asian countries - and ONLY Asian countries - take in millions of non-Blacks or non-Asians and force integrate and assimilate with them. In predominantly White countries - and ONLY in predominantly White countries - race is just supposed to be a "social construct" - except when it comes time to blame White people for everything bad that has happened throughout history. Thus, who cares if White people have a future? When deliberate policy is destructive of a non-White population, it's called genocide. Should Tibetan people be forced to assimilate with the Han Chinese population because they're just a "social construct"? After all, we all "bleed red," right? But when this happens to a White population, it's called "progressive." It is openly stated in the media that White people will become a minority in countries they founded - including the UK - and some people think this is a good thing. How is that not anti-White? Would it be pro-Black to argue that Black people should become a minority in predominantly Black countries? Should a Black man smile at such a thing and say, "diveristy is our strength" lest he be called a "racist"? ONLY White people are attacked and labelled "racist" for caring about their own ethnic identity. Other ethnic groups are encouraged to do so. In fact, we're told that this makes "dull" White communities "vibrant." What if I said that "dull" Black communities need to be less Black to be "vibrant"? How is this not just anti-White? How is the deliberate destruction of a people not genocide? Oh, and every other attempt at genocide began with denying or degrading the identity of the targeted population.

Funny how the countries that first come to your mind are all predominantly white.... And, of course, the answer is to create a blended humanity to turn the majority into a minority ONLY in those countries, right? Anti-racist is just code for anti-white.

Asian countries for Asians. African countries for Africans. White countries for everybody or you're racist! It is said that there is this RACE problem. It is said that this RACE problem will be solved when people from around the world pour into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries. The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of people from around the world and "assimilating" with them. It is said that the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites. What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries? How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem, but rather the final solution to the BLACK problem? How long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this? But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I'm a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews. They say they are anti-racist, but they're really anti-white. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white. Since 1948, international law has defined genocide as the deliberate destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious or national group. Raphael Lemkin, who created the word, used it broadly to describe not only outright extermination, but also demographic restructuring and policies that bring about the destruction of culture, language, national feelings and religion. "For the economy..." doesn't justify genocide. "Population growth..." doesn't justify genocide. "Because of history..." doesn't justify genocide. "We all bleed red..." doesn't justify genocide. "Race is just a social construct..." doesn't justify genocide. There is no justification for genocide.

Anti-white response: 1) Race is just a social construct; white people don't exist. 2) Everything bad throughout history is the fault of white people... who don't exist. 3) Wish for a future where race is eliminated - ONLY in predominantly white countries - through mass immigration and forced integration (AKA genocide). 4) Use point number 2 to justify genocide. 5) White people who object to the above should not be allowed to speak because they are BAD! Jews are Semites, and it is true that they consider themselves different. It is also true that Jewish lobby groups pushed for open immigration in predominantly white countries and created & push multiculturalism in predominantly white countries. They called the national origin quota system racist, yet Israel's immigration system is basically the same thing; it gives preference to ethnic Jews. So, it's complete hypocrisy and double-standard - not to mention that they treat Palestinians like dirt and compare gentiles to donkeys - but hey, if you want to defend that or even praise them like so-called Judeo-Christians (Oxymoron; Jews reject Christ and Christians seek salvation through him) that's your business.

Use a dictionary. It's you that dodged the question: ARE YOU FOR MAKING BLACK PEOPLE A MINORITY IN PREDOMINANTLY BLACK COUNTRIES AS WELL OR ARE YOU JUST ANTI-WHITE? I could ask you how many predominantly non-white countries you'd rather live in, but even though it would be amusing to watch you squirm while trying to answer, it's irrelevant. As I have said, there are many predominantly non-white nations that do not have living standards that are as good, but they still have the right to exist. Likewise, we have the right to exist, regardless of whether or not we're better, but you anti-whites demand this: Asian countries for Asians. Black countries for blacks. White countries for everyone!

You're being provincial. There are many predominantly black countries that do not have living standards anywhere near the level of Canada, yet that does not mean that they do not have a right to exist. Are you for turning black people into a minority in predominantly black countries as well, or are you just anti-white?

So, you've never heard of anyone pushing diversity ONLY in predominantly white countries? You've never heard anybody say the solution to race is "mixing the races," when they mean mixing races ONLY in predominantly white countries? You've never heard of projections of the majority becoming a minority ONLY in predominantly white countries? You've never heard anyone say that the future is brown in predominantly white countries? To say that you haven't wouldn't even come up to the level of a good solid lie and you know it.

Immigrants cost $23B a year JFK once called an immigration bill that would allow 250,000 immigrants per year, "the most liberal bill offered in recent years." Last year, regardless of serious global economic problems, the government of Canada brought more than that into a country with a 10th of America's population AND the Globe & Mail reported that the unemployment rate for immigrants in Toronto, the largest immigrant community in the country, was nearly 20%. So, not only are you wrong on that, but: "For the economy" does not justify white genocide. "Low birth rate", does not justify white genocide. "Because of history" does not justify white genocide. "We all bleed red" does not justify white genocide. "We are all human" does not justify white genocide. "Race is just a social construct" does not justify white genocide. Since 1948, international law has defined genocide as the deliberate destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious or national group. Raphael Lemkin, who created the word, used it broadly to describe not only outright extermination, but also demographic restructuring and policies that bring about the destruction of culture, language, national feelings and religion. Asian countries for Asians. Black countries for blacks. Israel for Jews. White countries for everyone! It's genocide. There is NO justification for genocide.

As usual, the point goes over your head. The anti-white system you defend depends on suppression for survival. It is that suppression, not discussion, that leads to violence.

All anti-white arguments always lead to a future without white people or a white minority and that's obviously not in the interest of white people. Anti-racist is just code for anti-white.

It was downgraded because of spending, and the answer, we're told, is to spend more. The word racist is used pretty much exclusively against white people who defend their own interests. pro-black = OK pro-Asian = OK pro-white = racist! anti-racist is just code for anti-white.

They may not ignore me, but they certainly ignore the obvious: Asian countries for Asians. Black countries for blacks. Israel for Jews or you're an anti-semite! White countries for everyone or you're racist! They say they're anti-racist, but they're just anti-white. Anti-racist is code for anti-white.

The US has millions of illegals to provide cheap labour. The US had it's credit rating downgraded. Immigration is the way it is because anti-whites demand this: Asian countries for Asians. Black countries for blacks. Israel for Jews or you're an anti-semite! White countries for everyone or you're racist! They say they're anti-racist, but they're just anti-white. Anti-racist is code for anti-white.

So you already know the meaning of something you're too lazy to look up for yourself? Are you sure you are not a monkey on a typewriter? I mean, you can type, but can you do anything else?

It is suppression that leads to violence. Asian countries for Asians. Black countries for blacks. Israel for Jews or you're an anti-semite! White countries for everyone or you're racist! They say they're anti-racist, but they're just anti-white. Anti-racist is code for anti-white. They say they're for diversity, but they push a blended humanity - ONLY in predominantly white countries - and talk about how the future is brown. It's genocide and its continuity depends on suppression.

You still don't get it. Nobody is flooding predominantly black countries with mass immigration that will turn them into a minority, forcing integration, and saying: it's just skin colour. Nobody is flooding Asian countries with mass immigration that will turn them into a minority, forcing integration, and saying: it's just skin colour. ONLY predominantly white countries are subjected to this and the end result is admittedly a white minority. It's genocide. Again, you don't get it. It doesn't matter if predominantly white populations are better or worse; they still have the right to exist. There are more than fifty predominantly black countries in the world. How many can you name with high living standards? Does that mean that the black people in those countries should be turned into minorities?

Wrong, under international law, ethnic groups do have the right to exist. I remind you that: The deliberate destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious or national group is genocide.

Growing up in "that" culture doesn't change the fact that it is the culture of another racial/ethnic group that created it.

The point obviously flew right over your head so I will repeat it: ONLY the white population of Toronto is decreasing.

I'm as loyal to a government as a government is to my people. If a government is destroying the future for my people, I don't care what they call themselves, I will oppose them.

Yawn... I call you lazy. To get this information, all you have to do is simply check the "visible minority" section of the community profile by census year on the Statistics Canada web site and do some basic math. For example, Statistics Canada will not give you the figure for the number of white people. Instead, they list it as "not a visible minority" and you have to subtract the aboriginal population from it to get the figure for the white population (see link given by Stats Can for that section of the community profile). Note: the totals that Statistics Canada gives are slightly off. I got the figures I'm about to list by adding up the figures for each ethnic group listed. Also Note: to get figures for 1996, you must add the figures of East York, Etobicoke, North York, Scarborough, Toronto and York together as this pre-dates the amalgamation. White Population of Ontario: 1996: 8,819,230 2006: 9,041,205 Difference: +221,975 Toronto (CD): White Population: 1996: 1,471,655 2006: 1,300,325 Difference: -171,330 Aboriginal Population: 1996: 9,885 2006: 13,605 Difference: +3,720 Arab & West Asian Population: 1996: 50,405 2006: 65,240 Difference: +14,835 Black Population: 1996: 192,395 2006: 208,555 Difference: +16,160 Chinese Population: 1996: 220,850 2006: 283,075 Difference: +62,225 Filipino Population: 1996: 65,865 2006: 102,555 Difference: +36,690 Japanese Population: 1996: 11,660 2006: 11,965 Difference: +305 Korean Population: 1996: 21,760 2006: 34,220 Difference: +12,460 Latin American Population: 1996: 47,870 2006: 64,855 Difference: +16,985 South Asian Population: 1996: 192,575 2006: 298,370 Difference: +105,795 Southeast Asian Population: 1996: 32,890 2006: 37,495 Difference: +4,605 Multi-Ethnic Population: 1996: 17,360 2006: 31,100 Difference: +13,740