Dissenter

I don't have to, they do it themselves, and they were lobbying to change immigration - ONLY in predominantly white countries of course - long before the Liberals figured out how to use it to get votes. Is Jamaican culture Chinese, Japanese, East Indian or European? No, black people created it. White people created European culture. Asians created Asian culture. You can be immersed in a foreign culture, sure, but that doesn't change the fact that it is the culture of another racial or ethnic group.

If I were to say that it wouldn't matter if the black population of predominantly black countries were replaced, it'd be considered racist and genocidal. Every ethnic group has the right to exist, which is to say that white people have a right to exist. You're looking at things in a micro view and genocide is macro.

Duh... That's what I've been saying all along: Black countries for blacks. Asian countries for Asians. Israel for Jews or you're an anti-semite! White countries for everyone or you're a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews!

Anti-whites like you are for mass immigration, forced integration, and like to talk about how the future in predominantly white countries is brown, but can't see how it's genocidal or anti-white.... Raphael Lemkin, who created the word, used it broadly to describe a "coordinated plan of different actions" including demographic restructuring and policies to bring about the destruction of the "culture, language, national feelings and religion. Turning the majority into a minority in a country is absolutely destructive. Regardless of the means, the end result is the same, and it's genocide. Furthermore, there are no social constructs under international law, nor is there any justification for genocide.

That's interesting because: That means that roughly 800,000 years BEFORE humans supposedly came out of Africa AND long before Homo sapiens existed, there were already humans living in Georgia.

And Detroit is a real success story. You can literally buy a home for a dollar there, yet when I mention this, people just don't seem to be interested in taking advantage of the opportunity. Think about it, you could be living mortgage free while immersing yourself in diversity. http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/mar/02/detroit-homes-mortgage-foreclosures-80

Watch the video I posted of a Jew saying that Jews "will play a leading role" in making Europe multicultural. There are far more Muslims in Europe than Canada. Culture is racial. You mean anti-whites don't care because they demand this: Black countries for blacks. Asian countries for Asians. Israel for Jews or you're an anti-semite! White countries for everyone or you're a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews! They say they're anti-racist but they're just anti-white. Is that why the white population of Toronto has decreased by more than 170,000 from 1996-2006 while the population of every other ethnic group listed by Statistics Canada increased, yet the overall white population of Ontario increased? The difference between me and many others is that I'll say what's on my mind without any regard for political correctness because it's not my religion.

Killing is just a means by which genocide can be carried out. Genocide is: the deliberate destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious or national group. UN Genocide Convention: Article 2 c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

Given that humans are so genetically similar to Chimps, I'd say the small amount that's different is pretty important. It's not simply a matter of quantity. But to the point: Nobody is saying we're all the same so we're going to flood ONLY predominantly black countries with immigration, force integration, and create a blended humanity with a black minority. Nobody is saying we're all the same so we're going to flood ONLY Asian countries with immigration, force integration, and create a blended humanity with Asian minorities. ONLY predominantly white countries are subjected to this.

It doesn't matter if white people become a minority in predominantly white countries, but a state based on an ethnic Jewish majority must be preserved? I thought you said ethnicity doesn't matter? "In 1912, a fledgling organization, the American Jewish Committee, wrote the president of the United States challenging the country's restrictive immigration system. From the 1880s to the early 1920s, Jews were in the forefront in opposing efforts to curtail immigration and institute a national origin quota system. Jewish opposition continued until immigration quotas were eliminated in 1965." http://www.chicagojewishnews.com/story.htm?sid=1&id=253954 This comes from a Jewish source. You understand that, right? When preference was given to European immigration, they called it racist, yet Israeli immigration is very similar in that it gives preference to Jews. But legal immigration isn't enough: "The organization [American Jewish Committee] supports a pathway for citizenship for many of the estimated 11 to 12 million individuals who are in this country [united States] illegally and would like to see a moratorium on deportations, which is not included in Obama's bill." Source: See link above "Nearly 90 Jewish Organizations and Individuals Condemn Arizona Immigration Law: Sign-on letter forwarded to congressional leaders today" http://www.hias.org/en/post/press-releases/90-jewish-organizations-individuals-condemn-a Again, I'm just quoting a Jewish source. Meanwhile: "...victims of torture, rape, war and genocide are to be imprisoned indefinitely, without the supervision of a judicial authority and against the international treaty on the protection of refugees...." "But interior minister Eli Yishai warned that if action was not taken, THE TENS OF THOUSANDS OF IMMIGRANTS WOULD EVENTUALLY REACH A MILLION AND THREATEN ISRAEL'S JEWISH MAJORITY." http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/world/2010/1129/1224284370678.html But that's different because predominantly white countries are supposed to be for everyone and Israel is supposed to be for Jews, right? In Europe: "Jews will be resented because of our leading role" in making Europe multicultural... which is a transformation that MUST take place: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYeZW-WcSlc I ask you, why is an American Jew, who made aliya (immigration to Israel) in Sweden pushing multiculturalism? What business is it of hers to say what MUST take place in Europe? And as I pointed out in a previous post, using an article on the Canadian Jewish Congress website for a source, multiculturalism is a Jewish creation. Yet again, that's simply pointing out what Jews say themselves.

"Our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the purposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same. Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset. Contrary to the charges in some quarters, S500 will not inundate America with immigrants from any other country or area, or the most populated and economically deprived nations of Asia and Africa. Only haters would make such assertions." -- Senator Edward Kennedy The people got exactly the opposite of what they were promised.

Yes, and you obviously don't know what the word means.

So what you are saying is that you can't debate MY comment so you're going to assert that I am someone else?

No because: Nobody is forcing mass immigration and integration on predominantly black countries that will turn them into minorities and saying: the world is a global village now. Nobody is forcing mass immigration and integration on Asian countries that will turn them into minorities and saying: the world is a global village now. This is for predominantly white countries and ONLY predominantly white countries. The end result is that the majority is turned into a minority ONLY in predominantly white countries. It's genocide. You mean by government that never gave the people they supposedly represent a choice. Immigration remains at a record high even when the economy is bad and there's high unemployment, and it costs the tax payer an estimated $23 billion per year. Diversity, remember? Eventually you want to blend white people out of existence and you can't understand why someone would call you anti-white. The definition of genocide: The deliberate destruction, in whole OR in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious or national group.

IN YOUR OPINION it is hatred. Nobody is forcing mass immigration and integration on predominantly black countries in an attempt to create a blended humanity and saying that it's just hatred if they object. Nobody is forcing mass immigration and integration on Asian countries in an attempt to create a blended humanity and saying that it's just hatred if they object. ONLY white countries are subjected to this, and what YOU are saying is that white people should accept it or they're in the same camp as a murderer. And yes, it is in bad taste because if you actually cared at all about those people you'd be expressing sympathy rather than trying to use it as a smear tactic.

That would be why there are virtually no white people left in Zimbabwe and more than a million have left South Africa due to safety concerns? Getting desperate? If someone that's against abortion commits murder, does that mean that everyone should be FOR abortion? Another failed smear tactic, and using a recent tragedy in that way only reflects poorly on you.

It is ONLY demanded that predominantly white countries be "global villages" with the end result being admittedly white minorities. It's genocide.

It's not at all false. They were founded by Europeans and the populations have been overwhelmingly white throughout most of the history of the two countries. Have I? More than a million white people have left South Africa due to safety concerns since the fall of apartheid, and racially motivated violence against white people is common. They sing songs about killing white farmers. South Africa is going the way of Zimbabwe, which has virtually no white people left. Jamaica is over 91% black with a black ethnic identity. There are no demands to make it diverse and turn black people into a minority even though they are not indigenous. Singapore has a Chinese majority with Malay and Indian minority populations and there's no attempt being made to turn it into a non-Asian country.

Black people have slaughtered each other by the millions in Africa, but nobody is saying that because of that, there should be a blended humanity ONLY in Africa that will turn black people into a minority. In reality, diversity is ONLY demanded of predominantly white countries and anti-whites call it hate when white people object to the majority being turned into a minority ONLY in predominantly white countries. Anti-whites are proud of being anti-white. It makes them feel morally righteous!

ONLY in predominantly white countries because anti-whites demand this: Asian countries for Asians. Black countries for blacks. Israel for Jews or you're an antisemite! White countries for everyone or you're a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews!

I could care less about who you worship. Do you know any real history or just the knee-jerk Nazi routine?

Canada was 98% white. In 1961, the population of non-whites in Toronto averaged 3%; in 2000, the percentage rose 54. Before 1961, 92% of immigrants that settled in Toronto came from Europe; in 2001, that dropped to 17%. Source: Canadian Geographic. Canadian history did not begin in the 1960s. As for multiculturalism: Multiculturalism is a Jewish creation - straight from the source - but even though Jews take credit for it, there will STILL be some twits around calling it anti-semitic to point that out.

The third world adds more than 80 million people every year to populations they are already unable to support, and pressure is put upon western (read predominantly white) nations to help them. By your way of reasoning - that the population of a nation is responsible for its own problems - the solution for them is birth control not migration to predominantly white nations, but the problem here is this: Asian countries for Asians. Black countries for blacks. Israel for Jews. White countries for everyone!

And the likes of Winston Churchill:

Nah, they're typical self-hating white baby boomers like you that drank the Kool-Aid of the 60s by the gallon. Good people, but mislead. Big fans of Trudeau, too, and the irony is that Trudeau was a fan of Hitler up until his mid 20s, but that's forgiven and forgotten because he was a Liberal. Just as Senator Byrd was forgiven for his involvement in the KKK because he was a Democrat.